Bartikus wrote:
You can wish to vote to ban anything you like. Religion and the practice thereof is a protected right by the Constitution.
That does'nt prevent you from wishing for anything.
Constitutional protections haven't stopped some folks from voting to ban legal recognition of some marriages, nor has it stopped them from loudly expressing those desires in the public arena.
Having the right to vote for that ban inspite of those constitutional protections is the current excuse du jour of those folks. Just thought I'd try it out on this issue that is near and dear to them to see how it feels to be on the other side of the fence. (Thanks for playing along.)
It's my guess that is exactly what Elton was doing. Elton John's opinion that religion should be banned is no less "out there" than those who feel that religious beliefs belong in the government and that religious rules should be made into law. It doesn't feel good when people try to use their right to vote their opinion as justification for doing so; does it.
I see it as him striking back at what he sees as the source of the hateful anti-gay bias he experiences. (The pope's anti-gay beliefs and remarks are part of the problem, as are the beliefs and remarks of Robertson, Fallwell, Sheldon, etc...who are all leaders of religious organizations.) Elton John is just a guy with an opinion like anyone else.
Personally, I'm quite sick of it all. It's not news, it's just some aging pop star's opinion. The only value for Real Life to post it was to get folks all riled up and looking for a fight.
Hey, and guess what Real Life? Elton John lives in the UK, not the US so the US constitution has little impact on the efforts of folks in the UK trying to ban organized religion there. In fact, the Brits have a history of and are quite experienced at banning organized religions.