0
   

Sweden third, US sixth in world competitiveness ranking

 
 
nimh
 
Reply Wed 27 Sep, 2006 06:01 pm
The Swedish Social-Democrats may have lost the elections, but the Swedish brand of social-democracy is still top of the school. Defying conservative economic orthodoxy by combining high taxes and high public investment with high competitiveness.

Quote:
UK slips and US falls in competitiveness league

Wednesday September 27, 2006
The Guardian

The British economy has slipped down the world league in terms of competitiveness but remains in the top 10 for the second year running, an authoritative annual survey from the World Economic Forum showed yesterday.

Britain is in 10th place - down from ninth last year - while the United States has fallen from first to sixth.

Augusto Lopez-Claros, the forum's chief economist, said [about] the British economy [..] "One area that needs improvement is the physical infrastructure - railways, airports, electricity supply. Public debt levels have also gone up and the pound has been unusually strong, leading to a drop in competitiveness for the export sector," said Mr Lopez-Claros. [..]

Commenting on the US slide down the rankings, Mr Lopez-Claros cited concerns over economic management and the business environment.

The business survey pointed to concern about "wastefulness" in public spending [..] "With a low savings rate, record-high current-account deficits and a worsening of the US's net debtor position, there is a non-negligible risk to both the country's overall competitiveness and, given the relative size of the US economy, the future of the global economy," the report said.

The top four economies in terms of competitiveness are now Switzerland, Finland, Sweden and Denmark. Mr Lopez-Claros noted that these countries did not conform to a low-tax, low-spending model. Singapore remained in fifth place.


Quote:
Sweden Number 3 in World Competitiveness

Radio Sweden
2006-09-26

http://www.sr.se/Diverse/AppData/isidor/images/News_images/2054/189620_366_177.gif

Sweden has risen to third place in the new World Economic Forum global competitive rankings.

The report lists Switzerland in first place, followed by Finland. Third place Sweden is followed by Denmark and Singapore. Last year's number one, the United States, has fallen to 6th place.

Sweden was in 7th place in the rankings last year.

Commenting on the strong showing by the Nordic countries, the World Economic Forum says they:

"Â…have been running budget surpluses and have lower levels of public indebtedness on average than the rest of Europe. Prudent fiscal policies have enabled governments to invest heavily in education, infrastructure and the maintenance of a broad array of social services."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 425 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Sep, 2006 06:57 pm
Funny, when I was in high school (back when the earth was much younger), they used to use Sweden, Finland, and Denmark as examples of socialist economies that were sure to fail. Is is thought provoking.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Sep, 2006 09:06 am
Well, it looks like nobody is interested in Sweden. Probably because they are so unAmerican
0 Replies
 
Chai
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Sep, 2006 10:55 am
Well good for them Cool
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Sep, 2006 01:19 pm
Re: Sweden third, US sixth in world competitiveness ranking
nimh wrote:
The Swedish Social-Democrats may have lost the elections, but the Swedish brand of social-democracy is still top of the school. Defying conservative economic orthodoxy by combining high taxes and high public investment with high competitiveness.

Just what does it mean for a country to be "competitive"? I have heard of the concept from economic snake oil salesmen like Thomas Friedman, who can't seem to get its mind off it. But does it have an economically or sociologically meaningful definition?
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Sep, 2006 01:50 pm
I believe it is a productivity indicator that refers to the amount produced vs the cost and all the accompanying expenses. As productivity goes up, you are more competitive because your products move more.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Sweden third, US sixth in world competitiveness ranking
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/06/2024 at 04:23:31