boomerang wrote:I guess what I see the problem as is if the object of the lesson is controling the writing implement why does it matter what color is used for the darn apple.
I mean honestly, aren't there bigger fish to fry?
I started this thread because I was frustrated with myself for teaching Mo the whole "go along to get along" thing.
Is that what you're teaching him, though? I think that's one of the layers of this thread.
I think it can as easily be that you're teaching him that while school can occasionally seem silly and pointless, there are usually good reasons for why they do things, even if it's not obvious.
One possible reason -- the whole concept of correct and incorrect takes on greater meaning at the kindergarten level. No, cat
isn't spelled "qzr." That can be handled in a variety of ways -- my way is to say, "hey, great, you figured out that it's three letters! And you're right, the "q" sound is kind of like the "c" sound." And go from there. But at the end, "cat" is spelled one way, the correct way, and they're there to learn that.
So there are meta-lessons there about correct and incorrect that I see having some value, establishing a background for the other things that are more important. As in, it could easily be closely related to the bigger fish to fry.
Quote:The school counselor approached me again yesterday noting how proud they were of Mo - he was doing so much better at coloring in the lines.
Cool!
I've definitely definitely noticed that this whole precision thing that I mentioned in sozlet's art is carrying over to her printing. She is printing much, much better than before she started kindergarten.