Intrepid wrote:hephzibah wrote:Intrepid wrote:We also have to consider that the 144,000 could be a symbolic number.
Symbolic of what intrepid?
Symbolic of the fact that only the Lord knows the true number that will comprise the mulitude.
Are we to believe that He wants all the world to be saved, but we are to take the 144,00 as a literal number?
Something like when Setanta starts to call people names like clown etc. It is probably symbolic of the fact that he cannot refute what is being said in a coherent and cohesive manner. A compliment really.
You can believe that you have something which i cannot refute if you wish, but that is not the fact. I was pointing out that you are made ridiculous by claiming that those who do not share your supersition are closed-minded. Those of us who are raised in "christian" societies have rejected christianity becuase we have open minds, and having examined the horsie poop being peddled, have refused to continue to believe or even to pay lip service.
You, on the other hand, want to make claims such as that the 144,000 figure is symbolic, becuase you are so wedded to the inerrancy of the scripture you worship as surely as you worship your imaginary friend, that you will go through all manner of ludicrous mental gymnastics to continue to assert that said scripture does not chronically contradict itself either directly or inferentially. People thousands of years ago must have thought that 144,000 is a big number--but now it is a ridiculously small number of people to assert would be "saved" by your imaginary friend. So you come up with silly statements such as your symbolism dodge, rather that have an open mind, and admit that your vaunted scripture may be flawed. You completely have failed to address my original criticism of a comic book god who would create being with a free will, and then condemn them for the choices they make in exercising that will. Your mind is closed to any possibility that your creed may be flawed or contradictory.
Clown . . .