I thought of this topic because Best Buy was running a sale on some DVDs that I wanted to get, one of which was
Wallace & Gromit and the Curse of the Wererabbit. I usually check online reviews of DVDs before I buy them in the store, just so I'm aware of any technical issues. One of the Amazon reviews specifically mentioned that, at the time the review was written, only the fullscreen version was available. Sure enough, when I went to the store, they only had the fullscreen version (I later went to a second store that had both the widescreen and the fullscreen). So I was lucky that I was alerted beforehand to the fact that there were two versions out there.
eoe wrote:I agree with directors who say that films are butchered, damn near destroyed, in the process. Like colorization. If the film was shot in b & w, it was meant to be seen in b & w.
I thought about that too. I remember when congress held hearings on colorization (one of the good things that came out of those hearings was the designation by the Library of Congress of significant films for preservation), and even then I wondered why nobody was complaining about "pan and scan" versions of widescreen films. Really, has anyone seen a fullscreen version of
Lawrence of Arabia or
How the West Was Won? To me, that's a far worse thing to do to a film than colorization.