1
   

Seeking Wisdom

 
 
coberst
 
Reply Wed 5 Jul, 2006 04:07 am
How do I get ready to see life whole?

It seems to me that to see life whole I must learn a great deal more than I already have learned but I must start with where I presently am. I am convinced that learning new stuff requires three aspects (a position facing a particular direction) of mind; mentally I must have curiosity, caring, and an orderly mind.
Is difficulty our duty? I think so.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 427 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Jul, 2006 01:21 pm
Good luck on your quest.


But I disagree with the statement that it is neccesary with historical knowledge to see life whole.
All the "wisdom" of seeing life whole can be understood in principle by examining the duality of any given phenomena, and understanding how this duality is, in fact, an illusion.

The world of dualism is the illusion that has cradled us, and wich still does. But it is a cocoon wich we need to breach to understand the true nature of existence.
0 Replies
 
coberst
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Jul, 2006 04:34 pm
Cyracuz


I can think of a few dualisms like mind/body or instrumental versus communicative action rationality, but I do not think you are talking about these.

Let's take the question does democracy work? As I see it democracy works when there is significant involvement of the people in the operation of the nation. That is, our citizens must accept a good number of duties for democracy to work in a way that is not a mere illusion. I think that in America democracy does not work very well and I suspect democracy will become less functional in a real sense. I think that it is an illusion now and will only get worse.

How does dualism fit in the things I am talking about?

Perhaps you would prefer to create your own example to make clear for me what is the meaning of this dualism that you speak of.
0 Replies
 
Cyracuz
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jul, 2006 02:43 pm
Does democracy work?

Well, this is a yes or no question to wich the answer depends on how you define "work".

And there is dualism here, on many levels. The most obvious is perhaps the notion that 'either it works or it doesn't'.

But where is the dualism in democracy?

One truth about democracy is that it needs two sides to work. It needs the eligibles and those who can vote for them. If one of these are not present the democracy fails.
So the mutual dependence of the rulers and the ruled is a dualistic notion in any system of goverment. The two do not have any real substance by themselves, and therefore their existence is bound to eachother, and they are one.

Out of all govermental systems, democracy is probably the idealism wich accomodates this fact to the greatest extent.

But, any govermental system is labeled after what is it's predominating attribute. There is no pure democracy, as there is no pure dictatorship.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Seeking Wisdom
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.14 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 06:57:41