Well, there's a way in between, isnt there? Excuse me while I ramble at length..
I mean, if I get this right, you're saying that it's bad for people to be moody because then they implicitly 'force' others to accomodate them, by being considerate. But thats in the eye of the beholder. Perhaps he doesnt
expect you to "walk on eggshells" around him at all - he's just not going to walk on eggshells around all of
you, by pretending he's cheerful when he's not, either.
I dont mind if people are moody. I get moody too. Life'd be too bleedin much of an effort if everybody has to continually act like they're happy. You'd end up in this sanitary environment where everyone acts happy, but noone is real.
Thats why I'd never ground in America, I think, with its Happy-Meal "have a nice day" mentality. Here in good ol' Eastern Europe, still, if someone is moody, someone is moody. You shrug at it and get along on your way too, knowing that you dont have to take it personally. You dont need to accomodate each other - the moody person doesnt need to act like he's really cheerful, and the people around him dont need to feel like they have to walk on eggshells. You get the real thing. (That also means you dont have to worry about whether someone is faking being nice, btw - if they're nice, its probly really cause they actually like you.)
Mind you, the mentality is changing, among the younger ones. And of course I dont mind it if the waitress smiles - thats nice (but then thats part of her job). Bratislava or Petersburg can get you down because of too many people being glum or rude. But on the other hand you're spared this creepy Truman Show vibe that middle-class America(ns) seem(s) to have.
The difference is - I dont mind people being moody, because I in turn dont feel the obligation to "walk on eggshells" around them if they are, (if it's not someone near and dear). They can be whatever mood they are, they dont need to fake happiness for me (is anything sadder?), but I also don't have to tiptoe around them. The sense that someone who's being moody 'poses a burden' to his environment when he's moody (instead of accomodating the people around him by faking a smile), only applies if you in turn
do feel like ought to accomodate him.
I dunno. Outright rudeness is hurtful anywhere, of course, it can really get to me. But someone brooding doesnt bother me - I feel like that sometimes too, so why in heavens name would I force him to act happy on my behalf? I just let him be, and I dont feel like him being broody in turn 'forces' me to be or do anything in particular either.
Anastasia discovered this point when she lived in Bratislava, in a highrise suburb. She got creeped out at first because nobody
smiled. I mean, regular folk at the bus stop or in the tram or in the shop. Middle-aged folk. No "oh excuse me, I'm sorry, have a nice day", just enter, shove, stand. She'd shoot someone a polite smile, and get this stony, defensive look back - that really got to her. But after a while she realised that they were being defensive because they felt she was imposing on
them. By smiling at them, she was basically making them feel that they ought to smile back, make an effort, communicate, at this random stranger on the tram, when they already had to slug through a hard working day for a pittance in korunas, suck up to their boss, go to the market for cheap produce and take care of their family. Jesus, leave me alone already - something like that. (As well as causing bother by confusing 'em -- in a place where random strangers dont smile at each other, her smile was forcing them to think: wait, who is this person, do I know her, should I know her, did I forget?, etc.)
I dunno. (That part of) Bratislava would make me feel very lonely and bereft of comfort I think. (Budapest is much better). But in turn living in suburban America would totally tire me out I think... and the whole fakeness about everyone "being nice" and you never knowing how they really feel would creep me out. I'd start positively yearning for someone to break out in an Amsterdam cabbie's empathic grumbling. (We call it "kankeren" - cancering, literally - and it's an art form. Wouldnt miss it. Pretty good at it myself too.)
Anyway - rambling.. I get annoyed by those here who seem to actively work themselves up into some pompous indignation so as to achieve some kinda, I dunno, alpha male feeling ("ha! I sure shut them up!"?), too, of course... I dont see the point. They dont look alpha male at all when they do that, they just look silly, or worse, like tired pricks. But when someone does come at me rudely when he normally doesnt, I do realise that - whatever - he mighta had a rotten day at work. Just shrug it off, next day we're pals again. Like you seem to be saying that people shouldnt force you to face their moodiness, I wouldnt want to force anyone to act cheerful on my behalf. So they're not a "social animal" today - well, whatever. Why would I want to force someone who's already in a funk to act like a social animal on
my behalf?
Makes me think of something else again. This question - you know, you meet some friend, acquaintance or whoever on the street, you ask "how are you?". The classic Hungarian / Croatian / whatever answer would be, "bad"
. Or "same as always", or something like that. (Thats changing now, the twenty-somethings here - downtown, I mean - all seem to be sunny and happy).
The proper answer in middle-class America, I suppose, is "fine" or "good" - from what I understand of American friends, you would never, ever "inconvenience" someone by admitting that you're actually not so good (cause then you'd force them into actually having a conversation with you or sharing something personal or whatever). Holland's getting much like that, especially the office people, the aspirational classes. Personally, that creeps me out.
Enough rambling <nods>. Sorry to derail the thread