Reply
Tue 18 Apr, 2006 05:35 pm
Whats the difference between a wave file and a WMA file?
WMA sucks because it lets Microsoft control your computer. mp3 is better because they can't control it.
contrex wrote:WMA sucks because it lets Microsoft control your computer. mp3 is better because they can't control it.
That is the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard. To be quite honest, WMA is a better CODEC. It has a much better compression-quality rate than MP3 CODECs. Having a WMA file doesn't let anyone, Microsoft included, control your computer. And seriously, why the hell would Microsoft want to control your computer anyway???
Listening to mp3 is like listening to music over the telephone. A full 16 Bit 44.1Khz PCM WAV blows the socks offa any lossy codec. That's why it is the standard for professional recording. Downmixed and processed WAV files - in full 16-bit, 44.1Khz PCM - are converted to the
Red Book CDDA[/i][/b] format for commercial CD reproduction. However, some folks never have heard good music reproduction, so I s'pose they just don't know the difference between high fidelity and audio garbage.
And that's just talking digital. Even WAV, CDA audio are recordings of samples of sound. Some people still swear by the old analog standard, vinyl, as the best format for high fidelity audio. Analog is a continuous stream of sound recording.
Too bad you can't carry a Walkman Turntable with you, though.
Well, there is DAT and Hi-MD, both of which are compact and support full 16-bit 44.1Khz PCM. Walkman-type Hi-MD players are no bigger than many MP3 players, Walkman-type DAT gear is a little bigger, but still within what would be considered Walkman size - not much bigger than a standard cassette Walkman. With good headphones (something else most folks have never heard), either can be very satisfactory.