2
   

The Wildclickers Trivia thread (# 70)

 
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Apr, 2006 11:53 am
Answer:

http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.rss.html?pid=19654

"Satellites Successfully Detect Whirlpools Under Ocean's Surface

PRESS RELEASE
Date Released: Saturday, April 22, 2006
Source: National Academy of Sciences

By Kristin Bullok

April 20 - A new study reports the use of satellite data to study the formation of meddies -- large disks of circulating water hundreds of feet beneath the ocean's surface. Using this method, researchers tracked these warm, salty eddies as they emerged from the Mediterranean Sea into the cooler Atlantic Ocean. "
0 Replies
 
Stradee
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Apr, 2006 11:53 am
Sue, just a bit of detective work. :wink:

Well thanks, ul! Was an excellent question!
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Apr, 2006 11:55 am
Q - Will coral reefs be dead by the end of 2006?

Answer:

http://www.sunherald.com/mld/mercurynews/news/world/14410698.htm?source=rss&channel=mercurynews_world

"More damage feared for coral
CARIBBEAN REEFS HURT DURING 2005
By Mat Probasco
Associated Press

CHARLOTTE AMALIE, U.S. Virgin Islands - Higher sea temperatures could worsen the widespread destruction of coral reefs that hit the Caribbean in 2005, scientists fear.

In the waters around the U.S. Virgin Islands, as much as 40 percent of coral died in some reefs last year, and the coral that survived probably isn't healthy enough to survive another hot summer, said Caroline Rogers, a U.S. Geological Survey biologist.

``It worries me. It's looking so similar'' to last year, said Rogers, who has studied coral in the Virgin Islands for 22 years. ``It's impossible to overstate how important this is.''

Reefs are vital habitat for fish, lobsters and other sea life that feed and breed in the sheltered waters. The reefs also deflect storm waves that might otherwise wash away the beaches that are at the heart of the region's multibillion dollar tourism industry."
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Apr, 2006 12:22 pm
The following story from National Geographic, which falls under the general heading of "Ya gotta love it", is worth reading. I have excerpted only some tantalizing quotes.

Huge rabbit on the loose in England. Destroying gardens. Being hunted with a shoot to kill order.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/04/0411_060411_rabbit_2.html


England currently claims the world's largest bunny, a giant continental rabbit named Roberto, which lives with the owners of a pet store in Worcester. He weighs in at 35 pounds (15.9 kilograms) and measures 3 feet, 6 inches (107 centimeters) long.

Originally bred for their meat, other

England currently claims the world's largest bunny, a giant continental rabbit named Roberto, which lives with the owners of a pet store in Worcester. He weighs in at 35 pounds (15.9 kilograms) and measures 3 feet, 6 inches (107 centimeters) long.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Apr, 2006 12:24 pm
And on a more somber note - and with no methodology with which to measure it.

http://www.itv.com/news/1794113.html

"hernobyl disaster 'worse than estimated'
3.58PM, Tue Apr 18 2006


The death toll from the Chernobyl nuclear disaster could be far higher than official estimates, according to a Greenpeace report.

The environmental group estimates the disaster, which took place 20 years ago, could be responsible for up to 93,000 extra cancer deaths worldwide.

Based on research by the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, the report said that of the 2 billion people globally affected by the Chernobyl fallout, 270,000 will develop cancers as a result, of which 93,000 will prove fatal.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) estimates 4,000 people died as a result of the explosion in a reactor at the power plant in the Ukrainian town of Chernobyl on April 26, 1986.

The explosion sent a plume of radioactive dust across northern and western Europe and as far as the eastern United States.

"It is appalling that the IAEA is whitewashing the impacts of the most serious nuclear accident in human history," said Greenpeace anti-nuclear campaigner Ivan Blokov.

The Greenpeace report further extrapolates that in total some 200,000 people in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus could have already died as a result of medical conditions - such as cardiovascular diseases - attributable to the disaster.

Greenpeace campaigner Jan van de Putte said: "Our problem is that there is no accepted methodology to calculate the numbers of people who might have died from such diseases."
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Apr, 2006 12:41 pm
And here's something that no one thinks about. Quakes in the middle of a plate.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/04/18/new.madrid/index.html?section=cnn_latest


Scientists: Quake could devastate America's heartland
New Madrid a mysterious and potentially dangerous fault zone
By Marsha Walton
CNN


MEMPHIS, Tennessee (CNN) -- Scientists and residents alike are focusing on the devastating San Francisco earthquake 100 years ago. But some researchers also want to bring public attention to seismic events in a region where strong earthquakes just don't make a lot of scientific sense.

During the winter of 1811-1812, at least three powerful earthquakes (believed to be magnitude 8 or above) and thousands of aftershocks were felt in America's heartland, in what's known as the New Madrid Seismic Zone. The region impacts parts of eight states, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, Missouri, Arkansas and Mississippi.

"They were felt into Canada, up in the Montreal region and that would be almost 1,200 miles away," said Arch Johnston, director of the Earthquake Research and Information Center at the University of Memphis.

Fortunately, the area was sparsely populated at the time. There were only about 400 residents in the frontier town of New Madrid, Missouri. They were awakened in the middle of the night when the first big quake hit December 16, 1811. (Watch what could happen if a quake hit the U.S. heartland -- 2:45)

"The comparable size 1906 San Francisco earthquake was barely felt outside the state of California. That's not because the New Madrid quakes were so much larger than the San Francisco quake. But our crustal rock transmits seismic waves a lot more efficiently," Johnston said.

That seismic efficiency could prove disastrous with today's population.

"We're looking at about 11 million people at risk, of that 11 million about 2.5 million respectively from Memphis and St. Louis," said Jim Wilkinson, executive director of the Central United States Earthquake Consortium, based in Memphis.

Scientists have a pretty good understanding of more than 90 percent of earthquake activity, such as the active area known as the "Ring of Fire" that runs along the west coasts of South and North America, up and across the Pacific Ocean to Asia.

"Most earthquakes occur along what we call plate boundaries," said Joan Gomberg, research seismologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Memphis.

"The Earth's surface down to about 100 kilometers (62 miles) is broken up into these big pieces, like a big jigsaw puzzle. Those pieces move around, at the edges of those pieces, where they are moving in different directions, is where we have earthquakes, and volcanoes, and where most of the action is," Gomberg said.

She said it is challenging work studying a region that does not fit that pattern.

"Here in the New Madrid seismic zone, we are in the middle of a plate. And it's really a big mystery as to why we have big earthquakes here," Gomberg said.

One mystery has been solved. The events of 1811-1812 were not a fluke. Geologic records show that similar strong earthquakes took place in the same region about 900 AD, and about 1450 AD, roughly at 500 year intervals.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Apr, 2006 04:05 pm
Q;Who was the bully who terrorized Arnold on Different Strokes?

A: the Gootch

http://rainforest.care2.com/welcome?w=856730509
All clicked in. Very Happy
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Apr, 2006 05:23 pm
aktbird57 - You and your 294 friends have supported 2,347,568.7 square feet!

Marine Wetlands habitat supported: 108,745.9 square feet.

American Prairie habitat supported: 51,241.5 square feet.

Rainforest habitat supported: 2,187,581.3 square feet.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

2347568.7 square feet is equal to 53.89 acres
0 Replies
 
danon5
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Apr, 2006 06:23 pm
Question = where is the driest place on Earth????? And what is the history of rainfall in the area?????

all clicked....................!

Really great stuff everybody....................
0 Replies
 
andrew T
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Apr, 2006 07:26 pm
Driest Place on Earth = Atacama Desert in
The Atacama desert in Chile gets most of its water from fog. Just a few millimeters of rainfall a decade.
http://www.esa.int/esaEO/SEM3PIWJD1E_index_0.html

Hi all Very Happy
Y'all have probably talked about it but (I'm not around your great discussions much) for a while aktbird57 hasn't been on the leaderboard on care2. Got this email today...
Quote:
Hello,

Thank you for contacting Care2 customer support. I'm sorry to hear
you've been experiencing problems with your race statistics. I was
able to replicate the problem you described and have submitted it to our
engineers for further investigation. We hope to have the problem
resolved shortly. We appreciate your patience while we work on a
resolution.

Thank you for your support of Care2, where every click makes a
difference!

Sincerely,
Care2 Support
0 Replies
 
danon5
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Apr, 2006 07:33 pm
Hi Andrew T - what a pleasure to have your company. Good quess, but, alas, not the driest spot.

Answer = The driest places on Earth are a series of valleys near Ross Island in Antarctica where, for the past 2 million years at least, no rain has ever fallen. Source: "Reader's Digest Book of Facts"

-------------

I understand that a LOT of the Ross has recently broken off and is adrift due to global warming - so, Andrew T - maybe you are right....... grin Shocked :wink:
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 24 Apr, 2006 09:33 pm
Q:What is the fastest flying bird in the world?

Very Happy Hi everybody!

I'm clicked in
0 Replies
 
Stradee
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Apr, 2006 10:33 am
Hi Andrew T! Very Happy

A. The Spine-Tailed swift is the fastest flying bird in the world.

http://www.4to40.com/images/qa/fastest_animal.gif
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Apr, 2006 11:38 am
http://www.space.com/images/060424_iod_hubble_04.jpg


The Hubble Space Telescope celebrates its 16th birthday in space today with a stunning view of the M82 galaxy.

Launched on April 24, 1990 aboard the space shuttle Discovery, the Hubble Space Telescope has been a vital tool for astronomers seeking to understand the history of the universe.

Here, the telescope turns its camera eye on the active galaxy M82, an attractive sky target for amateur and professional astronomers alike because of its cigar-shaped disk (it's also known as the Cigar Galaxy) and the flame-like plumes of gas streaming from its central regions. Taken with Hubble's Advanced Camera for Survey's Wide Field Channel, this mosaic of six images is the sharpest wide-angle view of the galaxy ever taken, Hubble researchers said.

M82 is packed with young stars arranged in tiny, yet massive, clusters that make up bright patches that themselves are arranged in "starburst clumps" in the galaxy's center. Only Hubble's sharp images can distinguish the clusters inside the clumps.

Many of the pale, white objects dotting the body of M82 appear to be fuzzy stars, but are actually individual star clusters 20 light-years across and containing up to one million stars.M82 sits about 12 million light-years from Earth towards the constellation Ursa Major in the northern spring sky.
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Apr, 2006 11:41 am
0 Replies
 
danon5
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Apr, 2006 01:08 pm
Hi all, all clicked.....

Stradee, you are too smart........ grin

sumac, GREAT photo. I saw that on the national news recently. I just think of all those people there - and wonder about their means of communicating.

Amigo, good question...................

Question = What country in the world - when the nationality of the people is pronounced - is a palindromic nationality????? Clue = it's the only one. Very Happy Very Happy
0 Replies
 
AaTruly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Apr, 2006 01:41 pm
How wonderful to see you, andrew T., Godfather of our Rainforest series. I recognize you even without your diacritical garnishes: Åndrëw T
When tired and sleepy, this is how andrew T. (genius of charset graphics) depicts himself:

~(#¿#)~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Thanks, Amigo, for starting this thread with its focus on geographic superlatives. Fascinating stuff.

What was the name and year of the largest earthquake recorded in the history of the continental United States?
(I'll bet Danon5 knows the answer to this one.)
0 Replies
 
sumac
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Apr, 2006 01:56 pm
I'm going to guess New Madrid, MO 1811-1812
0 Replies
 
AaTruly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Apr, 2006 02:22 pm
Right, sumac!

By "continental United States" I was referring to the contiguous 48 states. As for earthquakes in Alaska, a few (as in 1964) have registered even stronger than the New Madrid earthquakes.
0 Replies
 
danon5
 
  1  
Reply Tue 25 Apr, 2006 05:11 pm
Hi Aa, great to see ya. I knew about the MO earthquake and have visited the site of the Alaska '64 earthquake while stationed at Fort Wainwright '70-'72, near Fairbanks.
We referred to the 'continental' US as the 'Lower 48' - grin
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Lovatts - Question by margaret schwerin
1001 Ways to Call Someone "Stupid." - Discussion by DrewDad
Famous People Name Game - Discussion by Mame
Cities and Towns of USA - Discussion by Miller
Post about the one before you - Discussion by Green Army Sniper
Where am I - Travel Game II. - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
WHAT'S NEXT? - Discussion by Rod3
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 01/01/2025 at 02:01:35