Ah! Its the 'scientific' holocaust (gas chamber) denier ! Do you really expect anybody to take you seriously on issues of empiricism after coming out with that garbage ?
Can you prove empirically the existence of time?
No? oh... what a poor loser...
Whatever you say about me is in doubt, because you can't prove empirically whatever you say.
BTW I never said 'time dilates'.
And what is the difference?
In several websites where dudes are better prepared than you to explain the fable of Relativity, they have no problem saying that time dilates.
In fact, Einstein realized, the answer is both: space “contracts” and time “dilates” (or slows).
And you continued
In any case, 'dilation' is merely a useful concept in relativity theory which 'which makes sense of' the mathematics. These attempts at'picturing' are the case in many subatomic and cosmological models, even in cases where contradictory pictures are equally valid as in wave-particle duality.
And again, every relativist but you says different.
The speed of light is very close to 300,000 km per second (186,300 miles per second). It isn't until we get to speeds that are a large fraction of the speed of light that any change in the flow of time becomes apparent. However, at speeds very close to that of light the effect grows in magnitude very rapidly indeed until time almost comes to a standstill. This slowing down of clocks due to high speeds is called time dilation and has a precise mathematical relationship. For the sake of completeness I have included the relevant equation below but you can skip over it and move on to the graph below it if you prefer. The equation for time dilation is...
So, when we move, at whatever speed, time slows down relative to a stationary observer. But note that, for example, the occupants of a rocket travelling at very high speeds would still experience time passing normally. However, if they could see out to an Earth-bound clock it would appear, to them, to be running too quickly. If an Earth-bound observer could see a clock inside the rocket it would appear to be running too slowly. This is why the theory is called "relativity", it is because time is relative to whoever is observing it at a particular speed.
Go and fight with those imbecile relativists with their websites who can't understand that time dilatation is not the same as time "dilates or slows" but "a useful concept in relativity theory which 'which makes sense of' the mathematics."
But nobody would expect a religious pedant to understand the nature and status of scientific models.
Oh no, no, no... nobody will do that, you are absolutely right... damn! I say the "unscientific" word... I mean, you are relatively right...
The thinking involved in such such subtleties would be antithetical to their investment in dogma.
Say no more.
Now, please tell me, where can I obtain an Idiot ID like yours?
Can't you see that you have evaded a simple request which is the empirical demonstration of the existence of time?
I guess that you as an atheist are demanding the empirical demonstration of the existence of God.
Then, I see no problem asking you for such an evidence.
So far, several others who are playing for the Relativity Team are contradicting your position. They have no problem saying that time dilates, they agree 100% that such a dilatation is verified with the motion of clocks.
Moving clocks run slow.
This, above all else, is the key to understanding special relativity
In other words, they depend on the mechanism of a device known as clock.
But it happens that a clock is nothing but a device calibrated to make tic tic tic....
So, the whole theory of Einstein with its time dilatation depends on a tic tic tic machine.
Well, lets use a hammer and break the damn tic tic tic device, after all, breaking the tic tic tic clock will stop time to flow but we will feel nothing and continue living younger forever... according to relativity...