jespah
 
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 10:08 am
This is a continuation of http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=56279

That topic will not be unlocked; please use this one instead. Thank you.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 2,867 • Replies: 49
No top replies

 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 10:44 am
Whew!

For a minute I thought there was some new procedure.

I have always been a pro choice advocate.

We should wait until the zygote makes the decision for him/herself.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 12:32 pm
I go along with that, neo.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 01:07 pm
I wonder why the first thread was aborted. Question
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 01:11 pm
The mother wanted a career.
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 02:42 pm
I'm with Neo. I'll be 100% pro choice if we let the zygote be the one who chooses.
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 02:44 pm
I can't help but wonder why we're still discussing this, like anyone here is going to change their mind ... yea ... that's gonna happen!

Anon
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 03:05 pm
Actual people do change their minds. Fifty years ago abortions happened for sure, but only a tiny percentage of the population thought abortion on demand was a good thing. So we went through the cultural revolution of the sixties and, as a society, we have come to believe mostly differently about some things, have split down the middle on others. Perhaps we have even mostly retained some of our values.

But if general attitudes and beliefs can shift at one point in our history, they can shift again. Those of us who believe all life is worthy of serious consideration before we choose to dispose of it hope that we return to a time when abortion for convenience again becomes socially unacceptable.

Meanwhile, where the lives of others hang in the balance, those who believe strongly in the rightness of their cause will likely continue to speak out about it.
0 Replies
 
neologist
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 04:08 pm
Anon-Voter wrote:
I can't help but wonder why we're still discussing this, like anyone here is going to change their mind ... yea ... that's gonna happen!

Anon
I laid off of the other thread for many eons. I only came back to offer my miserable 2 Cents
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 04:11 pm
As usual, well said Foxfyre
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 04:15 pm
Anon-Voter wrote:
I can't help but wonder why we're still discussing this, like anyone here is going to change their mind ...


or a law..
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 04:18 pm
Laws don't have to be changed if people change their minds.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 04:19 pm
ehh.. very true
0 Replies
 
Anon-Voter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 05:14 pm
The people on this thread are not going to change their minds!

Anon
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Mar, 2006 06:34 pm
Intrepid wrote:
Laws don't have to be changed if people change their minds.


Yes Intrepid. That is right to the point. People who value life do not desire to exterminate the unborn, whether it is legal or not.

Unfortunately, if abortion was suddenly illegal today in America, Canada , etc there would still be millions of people who think it is perfectly fine to kill the unborn.

A destructive view of life doesn't stop at having legal abortion, look at the Netherlands moving to codify rules for allowing infanticide. The Peter Singers of the world do not recognize any intrinsic value in human life. Theirs is a completely utilitarian view.

Education and changing of people's hearts and minds is the only long term solution to the abortion problem, until all innocent human life is valued.

But just as with other crimes against persons, there will always be some who do not have self restraint. Therefore, there must be legal penalties for the taking of human life.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 12:42 am
Interesting article. Blacks are nearly three times[/b] as likely as whites to get an abortion.

Could this be because abortion clinics and Planned Parenthood affiliates target minorities, often locating their offices in areas with high percentages of minority population?


Quote:
Black churches urged to battle abortion
A higher rate of blacks undergo the procedure than whites, CDC says

BY TAMMIE SMITH
TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER

Mar 11, 2006

Black churches are not doing enough to stop abortion, speakers at a conference said yesterday, some comparing the number of black babies aborted annually to genocide.

"We are no longer the largest minority in this country. That is due, in fact, to abortion," said Day Gardner, national director of Black Americans for Life, an arm of the National Right to Life Committee.

"We have allowed abortion to become a kind of birth control for many of us. . . . Many pastors are afraid they will offend women if they talk about it."

Gardner was among more than two dozen speakers at the 2006 Pro-Life Conference held at Mount Gilead Full Gospel Church in Chesterfield County Friday night and yesterday.

The event drew a multiracial audience of 400 or more people over the two days. Greene Hollowell, a retired contractor and member of Bon Air Baptist Church, organized the event. Hollowell said he and other members of his church minister to women going into abortion clinics and try to get them to change their minds.

"Most of those doing the abortion-clinic ministry were white. Most of the people going in were black," said Hollowell, who said he initiated a partnership with Mount Gilead.

"The only way to stop abortion in Richmond is for pastors and their people to try to change the opinion of the public," Hollowell said.

About 20 organizations, including The Family Foundation, Virginia Society for Human Life and crisis-pregnancy programs, had information booths set up in the church lobby.

Statistically, federal numbers show black women have a higher rate of abortion than whites. According to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in 2001 black women across the nation had 29 abortions per 1,000 women ages 15 to 44. The rate for white women in that age group was 10 per 1,000.

Overall, more white women get abortions, but when factored according to percentage of population, abortion rates are higher for black women. The federal figures do not include all states because several, including California, did not report abortion data in 2001, and some states that reported total figures did not break numbers down by race.

In Virginia in 2004, state Health Department figures show 25,918 abortions. Of that number, whites had 13,000, blacks about 11,000. When factored over numbers in the population, the rate of abortions for whites was 11.3 for every 1,000 women ages 15 to 44. For blacks, it was 31 abortions per 1,000 women ages 15 to 44.

Other speakers included Dr. John Seeds, chairman of the obstetrics and gynecology department at the Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine. Seeds said that early in his training he was part of a medical team that treated a woman carrying eight embryos that had been implanted for her to become pregnant. The team reduced the number to two in a process called selective reduction.

"I never did that again," Seeds said. These days, doctors doing in vitro fertilization are less likely to transfer that many embryos.

Seeds said he was bothered by the number of pregnancies that end in abortion. Virginia Department of Health numbers show Virginia women had 101,826 live births in 2004, compared with 25,918 abortions.

"The vast majority are for convenience," Seeds said.

Speakers lauded South Dakota officials for recently enacting a law that outlaws abortion except when a woman's life is in danger. There are no exceptions for rape and incest.

"A child's right to life is not found in the circumstances of their conception," said Kelly Hollowell, author of "Struggling for Life," which looks at taxpayer dollars that indirectly and directly support abortion. She is also Greene Hollowell's daughter-in-law.

Reproductive-rights advocates suggest that the higher rate of abortion in black women can be explained by lack of access to health-care services, including birth-control services.

"There is a real disparity in the health-care system, in who can obtain preventive health-care services," said Mira Signer, director of statewide organizing for Planned Parenthood Advocates of Virginia. She did not attend the conference.

Planned Parenthood clinics provide birth control, annual Pap smears, testing for sexually transmitted diseases and other services at a cost affordable to women who may not have other health-care options, Signer said. Planned Parenthood is committed to keeping abortion available, she said.



from http://www.timesdispatch.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=RTD/MGArticle/RTD_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1137834661746&path=!news!religion
0 Replies
 
Eorl
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 05:30 pm
I agree too Foxfyre. That's why we are here isn't it?
0 Replies
 
Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Thu 30 Mar, 2006 06:07 pm
Well I am deeply grateful that I wasn't aborted Earl. It sure hasn't all been a rose garden, but I wouldn't have wanted to miss a whole lot of it..
0 Replies
 
Diest TKO
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 09:30 am
There is no black and wite with me, but if forced to ake a divide it would look like:

RU-486 pill - Not an abortion.

First Tri-mester abortion - I still believe in choice at this point. I thik that if ou are going to make the choice, now is the time no other time. Plus idf there is going to be any complication with childbirth that could seriously endanger the mother to be, it can be spotted now. While I don't LIKE abortion, I wouldn't damn someone at this point for making the choice to do so.

Second Tri-mester abortion - Now I side with the Pro life people.

Third tri-mester abortion - I change my mind again and... just kidding. Pro-life again, and annoyed by the bible picketers screeming "murderer at the first tri-mester women.

Basically I don't like abortion, but I cant' argue to make it illegal or remove a woman's right to choose. Honsetly I know a few women who have had to make that choie and it wasn't easy for them. Evangelicals make women like them to be whores and criminals. Not was the case with either women. Both have since went on to birth children and raise their families. I don't think that they did anything wrong.
0 Replies
 
real life
 
  1  
Reply Fri 31 Mar, 2006 10:02 am
Diest TKO wrote:
There is no black and wite with me, but if forced to ake a divide it would look like:

RU-486 pill - Not an abortion.

First Tri-mester abortion - I still believe in choice at this point. I thik that if ou are going to make the choice, now is the time no other time. Plus idf there is going to be any complication with childbirth that could seriously endanger the mother to be, it can be spotted now. While I don't LIKE abortion, I wouldn't damn someone at this point for making the choice to do so.

Second Tri-mester abortion - Now I side with the Pro life people.

Third tri-mester abortion - I change my mind again and... just kidding. Pro-life again, and annoyed by the bible picketers screeming "murderer at the first tri-mester women.

Basically I don't like abortion, but I cant' argue to make it illegal or remove a woman's right to choose. Honsetly I know a few women who have had to make that choie and it wasn't easy for them. Evangelicals make women like them to be whores and criminals. Not was the case with either women. Both have since went on to birth children and raise their families. I don't think that they did anything wrong.


Hi Diest,

First of all, welcome to A2K. Glad you're here.

Your position is not an uncommon one. May I ask, since you believe that abortion should not take place in the second trimester and beyond, what it is that makes that change in your position at that point?

Do you believe that the unborn is a living human being starting in the 2nd trimester , but it wasn't previously?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Abortion II
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/18/2025 at 05:58:20