RexRed wrote:Wolf_ODonnell wrote:RexRed wrote:Wolf, thanks for your info, it was very interesting. I am generally interested in most peoples opinions...
¬_¬ I don't know how to respond to that. My statement clearly wasn't an opinion, so I'm wondering should I take your post as a sign of sarcasm? Hm...
You also don't know how to take a compliment...
Sometimes it's hard to tell whether compliments are sincere or not on the Internet, especially when people (like me) forget to put the appropriate smilies in their post. I apologise for offending you.
RexRed wrote:I have got news for you... Science also believes the universe came from nothing... It is called the event horizon... And Santa Clause I am sure is lurking somewhere there too...
But science does not have a God to have started it all off, that is even more silly... At least Christianity believes there was an intelligence before total emptiness... Better than there was "nothing" before the Big Bang as current scientific theories propose... So who is being logical here?
Erm... Actually, scientists don't know what was there before the Universe. Still, the argument of God always existing is no more silly than the argument of the Universe having always existed (known as Steady State).
After all, if we look solely at our world, you'd think that being stationary is the norm for inanimate objects. However, in actual fact, moving is the norm for inanimate objects.
The only reason you don't see a wheelbarrow moving, is because it is moving downwards and the ground is preventing it from moving.
Don't forget that on the quantum level, electrons can go through two different slits at the same time. This defies "common sense", but on the quantum level it is perfectly natural.
Who is to say that everything has to be created? After all, the Third Law of Thermodynamics states that nothing is created or destroyed, merely changed from one form to another.
).