9
   

Its Time. Get Rid of 1/10 Cent Gasoline Pricing!

 
 
parados
 
  2  
Sat 7 May, 2011 10:32 am
@okie,
gas at 3.989 will draw more customers than gas at 3.999.
Your arguments make no sense okie.

RABEL222
 
  1  
Sat 7 May, 2011 10:36 am
@parados,
Do you know where I can buy gas at $3.989 per gal.? the last tank I bought cost me $4.159per gal..
engineer
 
  2  
Sat 7 May, 2011 11:37 am
@okie,
okie wrote:
I said "[priced per pound," not the weight that you bought. So the hamburger meat was priced in an even cent per pound, $2.99 a pound. They do not price it at $2.99 and 9/10 of a cent per pound. I realize that if they sell by portions of a pound, that the total price may end up a fraction of a cent and it is rounded to the nearest cent. I am okay with that, as that is done all the time and is normal practice.

It's six of one and half dozen of another. With that logic, if they listed the price per ten gallons instead of one gallon, you'd be happy even though everything else is the same. Pricing gas in tenths of a cent "is done all the time and is normal practice." I don't agree with the idea that sellers would drop the price by .9 cents/gallon instead of raising it. If they felt pressure to do that, they would do it now (except drop it a full cent) to get competitive advantage.

I have two litmus tests for advertising. First, is it fraudulent? In this case, the answer is clearly no, the price really is $3.999/gallon. Everyone knows the price, it is listed for all to see, the pump is capable of applying the price. Second, does it prevent a consumer from making intelligent choices in the marketplace. Once again, the answer is no because everyone does it. If I see one station marketing at $3.989/gallon and one marketing at $3.999, that extra digit doesn't stop me from understanding which station has the lower price. I just don't see any case that anyone is being harmed here.

If you want to argue against drug advertising, I'd once again take the side of the advertisers, but I think you could make a better argument. This is more of one of life's little annoyances that makes everyone say "there ought to be a law", but really there shouldn't.
H2O MAN
 
  -3  
Sat 7 May, 2011 04:42 pm
@parados,
The dumbmasses that voted for and support Obama would be drawn to that kind of pricing.
0 Replies
 
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Sat 7 May, 2011 06:25 pm
@parados,
How far will you drive out of your way for that price difference? Would you cross a road that is congested with traffic for that price difference?
Do you think that a dumb Obama supporter would drive miles to save that amount?
Really?

Are you being intellectually honest with yourself?

Please note that I am not asking you to be honest with me nor anyone else other than yourself!
okie
 
  0  
Sat 7 May, 2011 09:42 pm
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

okie wrote:
I said "[priced per pound," not the weight that you bought. So the hamburger meat was priced in an even cent per pound, $2.99 a pound. They do not price it at $2.99 and 9/10 of a cent per pound. I realize that if they sell by portions of a pound, that the total price may end up a fraction of a cent and it is rounded to the nearest cent. I am okay with that, as that is done all the time and is normal practice.
It's six of one and half dozen of another.
Sorry but pricing by tenth of a cent versus weighing a product in fractions are not at all the same. Another example, if you buy fabric, you pay an even cent per yard, never in a tenth of a cent, then they measure and cut it in yards, which might be so many yards and a portion of a yard, which results into a total cost that might be in uneven cents, then rounded to the nearest cent. This is common practice .
Quote:
With that logic, if they listed the price per ten gallons instead of one gallon, you'd be happy even though everything else is the same.
But they don't, for more than one reason, one being the price of 10 gallons would be tens times as high as for a gallon and therefore not acceptable to the public. Besides, we do not generally think in terms of buying lots of 10 gallons, we think instead in terms of how many gallons we put in the tank.
Quote:
Pricing gas in tenths of a cent "is done all the time and is normal practice." I don't agree with the idea that sellers would drop the price by .9 cents/gallon instead of raising it. If they felt pressure to do that, they would do it now (except drop it a full cent) to get competitive advantage.

I have two litmus tests for advertising. First, is it fraudulent? In this case, the answer is clearly no, the price really is $3.999/gallon.
I agree with you, but pricing in 9/10 of a cent is bordering on fraudulant, as it is unethical in my opinion, considering that virtually nothing else is priced in that manner.
Quote:
Everyone knows the price, it is listed for all to see, the pump is capable of applying the price. Second, does it prevent a consumer from making intelligent choices in the marketplace.
Yes I think it does prevent some consumers from making intelligent choices, or it at least encourages misleading choices.
Quote:
Once again, the answer is no because everyone does it. If I see one station marketing at $3.989/gallon and one marketing at $3.999, that extra digit doesn't stop me from understanding which station has the lower price. I just don't see any case that anyone is being harmed here.
And what do people say the price for gas is, they commonly say it is $3.98 at one station and 3.99 at the other, but in reality they have been fooled because it is really essentially $3.99 at one and $4.00 at the other. By using the 9/10 of a cent, the stations have essentially mis-stated the real price. By the way, "everyone doing it" does not make it ethical or decent to the consumer. As for me, I have had enough of their lousy little game that they have played for far too long.[/quote]

If you want to argue against drug advertising, I'd once again take the side of the advertisers, but I think you could make a better argument.[/quote]What does drug advertising have to do with this?
Quote:
This is more of one of life's little annoyances that makes everyone say "there ought to be a law", but really there shouldn't.
Maybe, and if there is nothing done, I will live with it, but frankly I think its time to make a law, because there are far more laws that are sillier than what I am proposing here. I have already given an example of the government making us buy certain light bulbs, supposedly to save energy. Not only would my law fix unethical pricing, but it would likely save a ton of electricity in signage. Besides, I think my proposed legislation would end up being loved by almost everybody in the country, which could not be said for very many laws.
0 Replies
 
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Sun 8 May, 2011 05:19 am
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:

Do you think that a dumb Obama supporter would drive miles to save that amount?


Do you even think about what you type before you hit reply?

These same dumb Obama supporters think all of their bills will be paid for them by Obama from the cash in his stash and yes, I believe they would drive across town for a lower per gallon price.
reasoning logic
 
  0  
Sun 8 May, 2011 06:02 am
@H2O MAN,
You would be correct if you were to say that some Obama supporters do some very stupid things at times but you would also be correct to say the same thing about republicans.

You might want to use the word {Some} because people know better than to think that {All} democrats or republicans would behave in such a manner.

I have a crazy question for you! Do you not realize that you are a socialist?
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Sun 8 May, 2011 06:14 am
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:

You would be correct if you were to say that some Obama supporters do some very stupid things at times


I know, and don't you think Obama would be ashamed to have supporters out there thinking he's going
to pay all of there bills for them with his stash? I realize Obama is a socialist, has this fact escaped you?
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Sun 8 May, 2011 06:51 am
@H2O MAN,
If you will address my questions I will be happy to address yours!

Do you not realize that you are a socialist?

I do think Obama would be ashamed to have supporters out there thinking he's going
to pay all of there bills for them with his stash if they are not disabled or have some sort of hardship! This is a very complex subject that requires allot of info in order to have a non-conformation bias understanding.

I do realize Obama is a socialist, this fact has not escaped me!





H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Sun 8 May, 2011 06:58 am
@reasoning logic,
I am no socialist.

Those were able bodied Obama supporters talking about Obama's stash.
Nothing complex about it... PrezBO should be ashamed, but he's not.

You do realize Obama is a socialist...
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Sun 8 May, 2011 07:04 am
@H2O MAN,
The word social has been demonized to the point that many people have forgotten what it means to be social!
H2O MAN
 
  -1  
Sun 8 May, 2011 07:24 am
@reasoning logic,
reasoning logic wrote:

The word social has been demonized to the point that many people have forgotten what it means to be social!

Comparing the words Social and Socialist is like comparing whole milk to urine.

BTW, the term "democrat" originated as an epithet and referred to 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses.
parados
 
  2  
Sun 8 May, 2011 10:29 am
@H2O MAN,
H2O MAN wrote:



BTW, the term "democrat" originated as an epithet and referred to 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses.

You speak ancient Greek and Latin, do you?
Democrat was NOT an epithet when it was first used.

But leave it to squirt to quote Neal Boortz who uses selective editing of an historical scholar. American and democrat were epithets. I guess that puts you on the side of the Royalists squirt. Congratuations.

http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/e/ellis-founding.html
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Sun 8 May, 2011 12:04 pm
@parados,
Parasite, you can't be serious!
It comes as no surprise that you are incorrect once again.

The word 'Democrat' as used in American history was/is definitely an epithet
and it refers to 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses.
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Sun 8 May, 2011 12:54 pm
@H2O MAN,
Yes you are somewhat correct in what you are saying!

I do have another question for you though!
Could your understanding of reality be just a little bit twisted or are you all knowing?
I would suggest that you forget most of what you know as it is a product of your environment and try a new fresh start!

I do know that this is a huge task to ask of anyone but if I were to ask this of someone born in Afghanistan, Africa or any other country would I be asking something that would not profit them if they were to do so?
Could these other people be a product of their environment and not you?

How would this idea not apply to you as well?
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Sun 8 May, 2011 01:04 pm
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Comparing the words Social and Socialist is like comparing whole milk to urine.


Is this from your understanding of linguistics or is this an emotional response or maybe something different?
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Sun 8 May, 2011 04:33 pm
@reasoning logic,
I'm thinking that you are both sensitive and irrational... is there more to you?
reasoning logic
 
  1  
Sun 8 May, 2011 04:38 pm
@H2O MAN,
Yes there is and if you would be kind enough to answer my questions I will do the same for you!
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Sun 8 May, 2011 04:38 pm
@reasoning logic,
You seem to enjoy projecting your personal problems and issues here, possibly as comic relief Laughing ... maybe you're just drunk Drunk ... maybe it's both 2 Cents
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Leveraged Loan - Discussion by gollum
Web Site - Discussion by gollum
Corporate Fraud - Discussion by gollum
Enron Scandal - Discussion by gollum
Buying From Own Pension Fund - Discussion by gollum
iPhones - Question by gollum
Paycheck Protection Plan - Question by gollum
Dog Sniffing Electronics - Question by gollum
SIM CARD - SimTraveler - Question by gollum
Physical Bitcoin - Question by gollum
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/17/2024 at 09:37:28