0
   

Wedding Crashers vs. 40 Year Old Virgin

 
 
Reply Tue 28 Feb, 2006 09:15 pm
Which one did you like better?

I found Wedding Crashers much funnier. And since my sense of humor rocks the casbah, I would have thought my opinion was shared by all.

However, after much discussion with other idiot friends, I found the consensus to be split.

This is your chance.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 822 • Replies: 11
No top replies

 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Feb, 2006 09:19 pm
Haven't seen Wedding Crashers yet, but I LOVED 40 Year Old Virgin.
0 Replies
 
sublime1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Feb, 2006 09:21 pm
I just traded my friend my DVD of wedding crashers for the 40 year old virgin.
0 Replies
 
Slappy Doo Hoo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Feb, 2006 09:23 pm
I don't know.

The "MA! MEATLOAF! FU#K!!!" quote gets me every time.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 28 Feb, 2006 09:55 pm
40-Year Old Virgin had one really funny scene and then a bunch of somewhat funny little lines here and there. I laughed, yes, but not through the whole thing. And the end was kind of goofy, but not in a good way.

Wedding Crashers was hilarious, and the funny scenes actually kept getting funnier as the movie went on. And that scene with the hand job under the table is a classic. I was busting out laughing when I saw that scene the first time.

Wedding Crashers wins by a mile in my book.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Mar, 2006 08:35 am
I thought wedding crashers was funny..

but a bit too much of a chick style flick for me

ya know.. boy meets girl, girl has problems, boy over comes problems FOR girl
and they live happily ever after. >sigh<
But besides that.. i liked it. ;-)
0 Replies
 
Slappy Doo Hoo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Mar, 2006 08:37 am
I heard before seeing it how Wedding Crashers was funny for the first 40 minutes, then got too sappy. But I thought it was funny all the way through. Will Ferrell gave it a nice boost in the end.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Mar, 2006 08:39 am
i thought it was definatly a funny film..

but

ehh... just kinda turned off by the sappy part of it.

but, thats just me. ;-)
0 Replies
 
Slappy Doo Hoo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Mar, 2006 08:44 am
Looks like we're perfect for each other, shewolf. You're the top, I'm the bottom.

Ouch.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 1 Mar, 2006 08:46 am
got some lube schweetie?
0 Replies
 
Slappy Doo Hoo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 3 Mar, 2006 07:18 pm
shewolfnm wrote:
got some lube schweetie?


Yes. KY has a new warming massage oil/lube.

I can't wait to get alone with my Boy Scout magazines long enough to try it.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  1  
Reply Sat 4 Mar, 2006 03:27 am
40 Year Old Virgin seemed as if it was set up on a lot of ad libbed scenes--the one-on-one dialogues between the different characters for example-- that felt forced and didn't really work.

Steve Carell's character was pretty charismatic, though, and he made premise believable.

Wedding Crashers was a better movie all around, though. It was better made, better acting, funnier. Vince Vaughn was the funniest character aside from Will Ferrell's cameo.

That Ferrell quote is hilarious!

MA! MEATLOAF! F@#K !!!

And that exasperated look on his face!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Wedding Crashers vs. 40 Year Old Virgin
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/04/2024 at 05:35:35