2
   

Do ya'll ever discuss...Philosophy?

 
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Feb, 2006 05:53 pm
JM.

Good points !

I take this one to be a reference to Godel:

"...Additionally, philosophical thinking backed up by "logic" is always suspect simply because in the beginning of "logical" thinking we always find it is based (necessarily so) upon assumptions....."

I would merely add that a second problem with "logic" is that according to Piaget it is a subsystem of "semantics" appearing only in adulthood.
0 Replies
 
coberst
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Feb, 2006 06:59 am
0 Replies
 
joefromchicago
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Feb, 2006 01:51 pm
JamesMorrison wrote:
Obviously, I am neither a Philosopher nor a serious student thereof but I find "The Oxford companion to Philosophy" helpful sometimes in giving me a little insight into specific "isms".

I would also recommend The Oxford Companion to Philosophy as an excellent reference work.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 12:02:01