1
   

Self-Actualization

 
 
coberst
 
Reply Thu 16 Feb, 2006 07:14 am
Abraham Maslow defined a hierarchy of needs to be:
1) Biological and Physiological (water, food, shelter, air, sex, etc.)
2) Safety (security, law and order, stability, etc.)
3) Belonging and love (family, affection, community, etc.)
4) Esteem (self-esteem, independence, prestige, achievement, etc.)
5) Self-Actualization (self-fulfillment, personal growth, realizing personal potential, etc.)

This hierarchy makes us conscious of the obvious fact that we did not fret about the absence of self-esteem if we did not already have security nor did we worry about security if we did not have water to drink or air to breath.

"Maslow says there are two processes necessary for self-actualization: self exploration and action. The deeper the self exploration, the closer one comes to self-actualization."

"A musician must make music, an artist must paint, a poet must write, if he is to be at peace with himself. What a man can be, he must be. This is the need we may call self-actualization ... It refers to man's desire for fulfillment, namely to the tendency for him to become actually in what he is potentially: to become everything that one is capable of becoming ..."

I think that the area in which Western society fails most egregiously is in the matter of an intellectual life after schooling. We have a marvelous brain that goes into the attic after schooling is complete and is brought out only occasionally on the job or when we try to play bridge or chess.

It appears to me that the fundamental problem faced by most Western democracies is a lack of intellectual sophistication of the total population. Our colleges and universities have prepared young people to become good producers and consumers. The college graduate has a large specialized database that allows that individual to quickly enter the corporate world as a useful cog in the machine. The results display themselves in our thriving high standard of living, high technology corporate driven life styles.

We are excellent at instrumental rationality and deficient at developing the rationality and understanding required for determining normative values. It seems to me that our societies are not prepared intellectually for the demanding task ahead. The only solution seems to be a change that will significantly increase the intellectual sophistication of the society as a whole. We need a rising tide of intellectual sophistication and Self-Actualization might be the way for our adults to add an intellectual life to their acquisitions.

To get an idea about S-A you might examine http://www.performance-unlimited.com/samain.htm You can do a Google and find other sites that you might find more interesting.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 910 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
fishin
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Feb, 2006 05:23 pm
Re: Self-Actualization
coberst wrote:
I think that the area in which Western society fails most egregiously is in the matter of an intellectual life after schooling. We have a marvelous brain that goes into the attic after schooling is complete and is brought out only occasionally on the job or when we try to play bridge or chess.

It appears to me that the fundamental problem faced by most Western democracies is a lack of intellectual sophistication of the total population.


It appears to me that, once again, you are reading things into Maslow's comments that simply aren't there. Self-Introspsection doesn't require ANY formal education nor "intellectual sophistication" and your concept of self-actualization has absolutely nothing in common with Maslow's.
0 Replies
 
extra medium
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Feb, 2006 06:55 pm
Re: Self-Actualization
coberst wrote:
It seems to me that our societies are not prepared intellectually for the demanding task ahead.


What is this "demanding task" you mention?
0 Replies
 
Cliff Hanger
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Feb, 2006 07:03 pm
A life coach? Isn't this a contradiction to what you are trying to debate here? Doesn't knowlege and learning come from actually doing instead of paying a life coach a jillion dollars to affirm your choices?
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Feb, 2006 07:12 pm
I think your life would be better served by just talking with people with an moderately open mind, Coberst, than pulsing information paragraphs.
0 Replies
 
extra medium
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Feb, 2006 07:17 pm
ossobuco wrote:
I think your life would be better served by just talking with people with an moderately open mind, Coberst, than pulsing information paragraphs.


Agree. Perhaps Maslow didn't include in his pyramid the part about "talking with people" (communication) vs "talking AT people" (lecture).
0 Replies
 
coberst
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Feb, 2006 02:49 am
It seems to me that the task ahead requires much more than talking to oe another. It requires much harder work. It requires study, thought, character development and caring.


Judge by the Questions


Judge a man by his questions rather than by his answers.
--Voltaire (1694-1778)

While I was in Asheville awaiting oral surgery my companion and I settled down in the waiting area of St Joseph Hospital to just ?'hang out' for a few hours. This was a convenient and a comfortable place to sit and wander about just passing time. One is pretty well free to walk many of the corridors and rest in many of the waiting areas along with everyone else. It was obvious that the hospital functioned fully 24/7.

A person can walk the corridors of any big city hospital and observe in wonder at the effectiveness of human rationality in action. One can also visit the UN building in NYC or read the morning papers and observe just how ineffective, frustrating and disappointing human rationality can be. We seem to be capable of developing vast systems to efficiently provide good or evil; but have not been able to completely ?'accentuate the positive and eliminate the negative'. Why does human reason perform so well in some matters and so poorly in others?

This is a question that has long intrigued me. How can we be so successful in developing a technology and yet be so unsuccessful in developing the ability to manage that magnificent technology? We seem to be like the man with an ?'Arnold' like upper body mounted on a spindle, varicose veined, arthritic lower body.

I have lately begun to formulate an answer to the question. I am not saying that I have discovered a new problem but that I have discovered how others have been struggling with this problem and that it is only now that I have become conscious of this aspect of reality. I am saying that I have discovered a problem that has worried mankind for centuries and that I have only now begun to understand the problem. I also want to be so bold as to suggest I may have a practical proposal to significantly impact the problem with a partial solution.

A certain part of reality exists for me only when I have become conscious of it. The first step of becoming conscious of any part of reality is to formulate a coherent question about it. It is possible to create solutions to problematic situations only after developing a clear understanding of the facts.

I have discovered that those who struggle with such questions have theorized that rationality can be classified into two major categories; instrumental rationality is that form that allows us to develop our technology and communication rationality is that form that allows us to deal with the other type of problem.

There are problems where the end is known and only the best means are of question. The dentist knows that I have a toothache and the problem he must decide is the best way to eliminate that toothache. The dentist is the subject and the toothache is the object. The problem exists between a subject and an object. The end is clear, eliminate the ache, the means will be either pull the tooth or do a root canal. Instrumental rationality is to determine the best means to reach a specified end.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Self-Actualization
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/20/2026 at 02:42:31