1
   

Sweden an oil free country by 2020?

 
 
Reply Wed 8 Feb, 2006 01:49 am
President Bush may have surprised international observers by pledging in his State of the Union address to break his country's addiction to foreign oil - but Sweden was already one step ahead of him.

Quote:
Sweden plans to be world's first oil-free economy

· 15-year limit set for switch to renewable energy
· Biofuels favoured over further nuclear power


John Vidal, environment editor
Wednesday February 8, 2006
The Guardian

Sweden is to take the biggest energy step of any advanced western economy by trying to wean itself off oil completely within 15 years - without building a new generation of nuclear power stations.

The attempt by the country of 9 million people to become the world's first practically oil-free economy is being planned by a committee of industrialists, academics, farmers, car makers, civil servants and others, who will report to parliament in several months.

The intention, the Swedish government said yesterday, is to replace all fossil fuels with renewables before climate change destroys economies and growing oil scarcity leads to huge new price rises.
"Our dependency on oil should be broken by 2020," said Mona Sahlin, minister of sustainable development. "There shall always be better alternatives to oil, which means no house should need oil for heating, and no driver should need to turn solely to gasoline."

According to the energy committee of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, there is growing concern that global oil supplies are peaking and will shortly dwindle, and that a global economic recession could result from high oil prices.

Ms Sahlin has described oil dependency as one of the greatest problems facing the world. "A Sweden free of fossil fuels would give us enormous advantages, not least by reducing the impact from fluctuations in oil prices," she said. "The price of oil has tripled since 1996."

A government official said: "We want to be both mentally and technically prepared for a world without oil. The plan is a response to global climate change, rising petroleum prices and warnings by some experts that the world may soon be running out of oil."

Sweden, which was badly hit by the oil price rises in the 1970s, now gets almost all its electricity from nuclear and hydroelectric power, and relies on fossil fuels mainly for transport. Almost all its heating has been converted in the past decade to schemes which distribute steam or hot water generated by geothermal energy or waste heat. A 1980 referendum decided that nuclear power should be phased out, but this has still not been finalised.

The decision to abandon oil puts Sweden at the top of the world green league table. Iceland hopes by 2050 to power all its cars and boats with hydrogen made from electricity drawn from renewable resources, and Brazil intends to power 80% of its transport fleet with ethanol derived mainly from sugar cane within five years.

Last week George Bush surprised analysts by saying that the US was addicted to oil and should greatly reduce imports from the Middle East. The US now plans a large increase in nuclear power.

The British government, which is committed to generating 10% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2012, last month launched an energy review which has a specific remit to consider a large increase in nuclear power. But a report by accountants Ernst & Young yesterday said that the UK was falling behind in its attempt to meet its renewables target.

"The UK has Europe's best wind, wave and tidal resources yet it continues to miss out on its economic potential," said Jonathan Johns, head of renewable energy at Ernst & Young.

Energy ministry officials in Sweden said they expected the oil committee to recommend further development of biofuels derived from its massive forests, and by expanding other renewable energies such as wind and wave power.

Sweden has a head start over most countries. In 2003, 26% of all the energy consumed came from renewable sources - the EU average is 6%. Only 32% of the energy came from oil - down from 77% in 1970.

The Swedish government is working with carmakers Saab and Volvo to develop cars and lorries that burn ethanol and other biofuels. Last year the Swedish energy agency said it planned to get the public sector to move out of oil. Its health and library services are being given grants to convert from oil use and homeowners are being encouraged with green taxes. The paper and pulp industries use bark to produce energy, and sawmills burn wood chips and sawdust to generate power.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,812 • Replies: 40
No top replies

 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Feb, 2006 02:00 am
It would be nice to free ourselves from the oil yoke but I know that Canada will have no need to in the shorter run.
0 Replies
 
detano inipo
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 04:06 pm
It is good to see at least one country where politicians are planning for the next generation.
All leaders who only think about their re-election are not to be trusted.
To go full throttle and use up our resources is criminal.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 04:15 pm
The Swedes also swore off nuclear power about three years ago. However none of their nuclear plants have yet been shut down. Now they promise to rid themselves of petroleum, but "with no additional nuclear plants". It appears that the earlier promise has been forgotten - this will likely be the fate of the newest one. Sweden appears to be very good at promises ....
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 04:23 pm
Perhaps so, but I have more confidence in Sweden's chances, than I do our ability to end our "addiction to foreign oil" under the Bush Administration...

Hydrogen-powered cars, good lord. Why is it when latter-day conservatives come up with proposed solutions, they pick science fiction approaches rather than something realistic and close at hand?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 04:46 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
The Swedes also swore off nuclear power about three years ago. However none of their nuclear plants have yet been shut down.


The first reactor came offline in 1999, the second in 2005. ( Barseback 1 and 2)
You must have different sources than the official and what the media and my Swedish relatives reported.

Actually, nowadays - with all the controvery about it in Sweden - it is not likely that Sweden can complete the nuclear power phase-out by 2010. It has been estimated that some of the remaining ten nuclear power plants in operation will stay in operation until 2050.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 04:53 pm
Recycle their massage oil Smile
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Feb, 2006 11:27 pm
Thanks for the correction Walter. However I believe my basic point stands. The Swedes have a propensity for loudly declaring their intent to fulfill the most radical of the currently fashionable "progressive" issues, and then rather quietly evading the self-imposed deadline or goal. There are several words available to describe this kind of childish behavior - none of them very flattering. We should take their new goal with respect to petroleum no more seriously than the earlier one with respect to nuclear power.
0 Replies
 
detano inipo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Feb, 2006 07:15 am
Georgeob 1, it is easy to belittle Sweden with words. However, facts tell another story.

Sweden is tops or second in official statistics. The reason may be the politicians that run Sweden for a long time. They have a 'social conscience' and they act instead of just talking.

Example of poor government: USA.


Overall top 10 by EPI Score

1 New Zealand 88.0
2 Sweden 87.8
3 Finland 87.0
4 Czech Republic 86.0
5 United Kingdom 85.6
6 Austria 85.2
7 Denmark 84.2
8 Canada 84.0
9 Malaysia 83.3
10 Ireland 83.3
-------------------
28 United States 78.5
......................................................
Overall bottom 10

133 Niger 25.7
132 Chad 30.5
131 Mauritania 32.0
130 Mali 33.9
129 Ethiopia 36.7
128 Angola 39.3
127 Pakistan 41.1
126 Burkina Faso 43.2
125 Bangladesh 43.5
124 Sudan 44.0

Top 5 Environmental health

1 Sweden 99.4
2 France 99.2
3 Australia 99.0
4 United Kingdom 98.9
5 Finland 98.8
---------------------------
13 United States 98.3



http://www.guardian.co.uk/climatechange/story/0,,1693431,00.html
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 12:35 am
detano inipo wrote:
Georgeob 1, it is easy to belittle Sweden with words. However, facts tell another story.
Yes they do, and the billions and billions in Swiss banks absorbed from the massive influx of Nazi money and valuables stolen most often from the Jews during WW II (of which virtually no consideration has ever been provided) tells the story very well.

It is no small surprise that they can afford their socialized pseudo humanitarian perspective. Consummate hypocrisy.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 12:42 am
Chumly wrote:
Yes they do, and the billions and billions in Swiss banks absorbed from the massive influx of Nazi money and valuables stolen most often from the Jews during WW II (of which virtually no consideration has ever been provided) tells the story very well.



Well, I'm rather sure, virtually no evidence about this has ever been provided - atcually, Sweden was thought until your response to be the safe haven for thousands and thousands of Jewish refugees - e.g. for all 7,500 Danish Jews (besides about 150, who couldn't be rescued and died in the NS camps).

Could you give perhaps a source for your opinion?
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 12:48 am
I might suggest you look into the Reichmans relatively recent efforts in this regard.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 12:53 am
Here are further examples for your increased purview:
http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/~llou/nazigold.html

http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/europe/9805/25/nazi.gold/

http://history1900s.about.com/library/holocaust/aa072397.htm

12 Heirs of Nazi Victims Win Swiss Bank Claim

By Ryan Pearson
Associated Press
Friday, April 15, 2005; Page A05

LOS ANGELES, April 14 -- Maria Altmann was still in disbelief Thursday, the day after a New York judge restored part of her family fortune by approving a $21.9 million award to her and 11 other heirs of her uncle and a business partner victimized by the Nazis.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A55500-2005Apr15.html
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 12:59 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Well, I'm rather sure, virtually no evidence about this has ever been provided
Right a 1.25 billion-dollar global settlement!!

Switzerland:
The complicity of the Swiss banks and government in funding the Nazi regime was known at the end of World War II. However, the degree of deceit has only recently become clear.

During the World War II era:

Before they were captured by the Nazi regime, an unknown number of Jewish and other Holocaust victims had opened Swiss bank accounts and safety deposit boxes, in order to prevent at least some of their assets from following into Nazi hands.
German Banker Emil Puhl coordinated a Nazi program during the 1930's and 1940's to launder "monetary gold" stolen from the central banks of Europe. It was often smelted in Germany together with "non-monetary gold" -- a term used to describe the tooth fillings and gold rings removed from the corpses of Holocaust victims. The Swiss banks accepted the gold and provided loans to Germany. This significantly extended the duration of World War II, and assured the survival of Switzerland as a neutral country.
Paul Grueninger, police chief in St. Gallen Canton violated regulations and helped thousands of Austrian Jews to escape to Switzerland. He was dismissed from the police force and convicted of fraud. 55 years later, the Swiss government exonerated him, posthumously. 7

1946: During this year:

After the war, the Swiss and American governments reached an accord in which Switzerland was to return US$ 58 million to Europe's central banks. This was about 25% of the country's estimated windfall. The Swiss government also promised to liquidate about US$ 500 million in German assets in their country, and contribute half to help resettle refugees. They never fulfilled this commitment.
Holocaust survivors and families of holocaust victims attempted to reclaim their assets deposited in Swiss banks. Some later testified to a U.S. Senate committee investigation that some of the banks required that the families provide death certificates -- an impossible task for victims of the Nazi killing machine. Other banks allegedly made only a cursory search, if the relatives could not provide an exact account number. 4
An American intelligence report, dated 1946-JAN-12, and released by Senator Alfonse D'Amato (R-NY) and the World Jewish Congress in 1997, stated that 280 truckloads of German gold bars were sent from Switzerland to Spain and Portugal between 1943-MAY and 1944-FEB. Swiss officials said that the report was in error; only about 70 truckloads were sent. They commented that it was German gold and that Switzerland only acted as an intermediary.

1962: Swiss bankers said that they had released the last of their unclaimed wartime bank deposits.

1995: During this year:

Swiss bankers announce that they found an additional 775 inactive wartime accounts containing about US$ 32 million. 4
Federal President Kaspar Villiger admitted that "we bear a considerable burden of guilt for the treatment of Jews by our country". This was the first admission by a Swiss government leader of any Swiss culpability for the fate of European Jewry; it took them 50 years to finally admit wrongdoing. 7

1996: During this year:

Jean-Pascal Delamuraz, the president of Switzerland, said that American efforts to create a "compensation fund" for Holocaust survivors was "nothing less than extortion and blackmail...This fund would make it much more difficult to establish the truth. Such a fund would be considered an admission of guilt." 5
Christopher Meili, a 28 year old security guard at the Union Bank of Switzerland halted the destruction of bank documents from the World War II era. He took some of the material that was about to be shredded and gave it to a Jewish agency; it allegedly contained information about specific bank clients. Reuters quoted a bank spokesperson as saying: "In principle the documents and the Holocaust debate have nothing to do with each other." 5

1997: The Volcker Commission, led by former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, was set up by the Swiss banks, in cooperation with the World Jewish Congress and the World Jewish Restitution Organization. They started to examine Swiss accounts opened by foreigners between 1933 and 1945. Hundreds of additional accounts totaling about US$ 8 million were found. Bankers also revealed that there are up to 20,000 dormant accounts opened by Swiss citizens during the war, some of which may have been set up to hold assets of Holocaust victims. The U.S. government issued a report outlining the financial dealings between Swiss bankers and the Nazi regime.

2000: In mid year, the two largest banks in Switzerland, UBS and Credit Suisse, approved a "1.25 billion-dollar global settlement aimed at ending the long-running dispute over Holocaust assets."
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 01:02 am
Walter Hinteler wrote:
....atcually, Sweden was thought until your response to be the safe haven for thousands and thousands of Jewish refugees.........
In the summer of 1942, when the mass deportations had begun taking millions to their deaths in camps, Switzerland closed its borders completely to all refugees. Though contemporary views of this action question Switzerland's intentions, Switzerland was not the only nation to close their borders to Jews during the war and the United States and Great Britian are prime examples.
http://history1900s.about.com/library/holocaust/aa072397.htm
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 01:06 am
Some 18,000 Jews live in Switzerland out of a total population of 7.13 million in 2001/2

Err.. that sure is a huge amount of Jews!
http://www.tau.ac.il/Anti-Semitism/asw2001-2/switzerland.htm
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 01:08 am
Data shows Swiss hauled stolen Jewish gold for Nazis
http://www.jewishsf.com/content/2-0-/module/displaystory/story_id/5291/edition_id/98/format/html/displaystory.html

The gold, worth an estimated $250 million to $500 million, came from the central banks of countries occupied by Germany and taken from dead Holocaust victims.

The gold was carried in trucks bearing the Swiss national emblem and insured by Swiss companies, according to a 1946 U.S. intelligence memo and a transcript of a 1945 military interrogation of the Nazi official who headed Germany's wartime gold department.

"Switzerland emerges as not only a banking center for Hitler's Germany, but a one-stop laundering center," said Elan Steinberg, WJC executive director.

Meanwhile, Jean-Pascal Delamuraz, Switzerland's former president, issued an apology for calling Jewish demands for a Holocaust compensation fund "blackmail." The apology came in a letter to Edgar Bronfman, WJC president. The group said it would now resume working with the Swiss government.

Nonetheless, new revelations fuel the storm over Switzerland's wartime relationship with Nazi Germany, and follow signs that those relations extended beyond the economic to the military sphere.

In another development, Switzerland's largest bank came under fire this week when it admitted to throwing away World War II-era archive material in violation of a government ban on the destruction of records that might reveal details about wartime transactions.

Union Bank of Switzerland said one of its employees threw away documents, thinking they were not important. A security guard reportedly rescued the documents and handed them over to Jewish community officials in Zurich, who then gave them over to police. The guard was then reportedly suspended from his job, pending an investigation.

The new disclosures come amid a dispute between Jewish and Swiss officials surrounding the creation of a preliminary fund to begin compensating Jews possibly entitled to assets deposited in Swiss banks during the World War II era.

After the release of the documents on shipments to Spain and Portugal, a top Swiss National Bank official acknowledged that such shipments were made, but said they amounted to only one-fourth of the total cited by D'Amato and Jewish leaders.

He denied claims that Swiss banks had laundered money for the Nazis and insisted that the shipments to Portugal and Spain were consistent with Switzerland's neutral war posture.

Responded D'Amato, "We are tired of half-truths that only come out when they are faced with overwhelming evidence.

"The Swiss bankers were the profiteers, they were the Nazi bankers. They made blood money and that doesn't seem to me to be neutrality."

Other newly released World War II-era documents, meanwhile, show that Swiss-Nazi collaboration went to the military level.

The United States was so outraged by massive Swiss supplies of munitions to Germany during the war that it considered imposing a total economic blockade of Switzerland, according to an October 1943 letter from Adm. William Leahy, a member of the joint chiefs of staff, to Secretary of State Cordell Hull.

Leahy said an increase in Swiss military aid to Germany was damaging the Allied war effort.

"It is particularly significant that at the very time that the British and American combined bomber offensive is beginning to substantially affect German production of munitions," the letter states, "Swiss exports of munitions to Germany have been considerably increased..."

The joint chiefs suggested a ban on exports to Switzerland, but the WJC said it has been unable to determine if that happened.

The dispute between Switzerland and Jewish groups began earlier this month when Delamuraz accused Jewish groups of trying to "blackmail" Switzerland into paying Holocaust victims $250 million.

Stepping down from Switzerland's rotating presidential post, Delamuraz said: "If we agreed now to a compensation fund, this would be taken as an admission of guilt. This is nothing less than extortion and blackmail."

Jewish officials said the remarks bordered on anti-Semitism and implored the Swiss to distance themselves from Delamuraz and apologize.

Before he issued his apology to Bronfman, Delamuraz, now the economics minister, said his remarks were misrepresented and added he was sorry if he offended families of Holocaust victims.

Jewish and Swiss officials began discussing the creation of a preliminary compensation fund late last year. But it was the Swiss side, WJC officials said, that proposed the $250 million figure.

The World Jewish Restitution Organization, which is coordinating worldwide restitution efforts, had urged economic sanctions if Swiss authorities did not denounce Delamuraz's statements and accelerate their investigation into missing Jewish assets.

Switzerland may be bowing to pressure to open a compensation fund. The Swiss Cabinet said it would support such a fund if it comes from dormant bank accounts, not government money.

Jewish officials have rejected the plan, saying the money is not Switzerland's to offer and should come from the government.

Against this backdrop, Swiss Jewish officials have expressed concern about new Swiss anti-Semitism.

Martin Rosenfeld, general secretary of the Swiss Jewish Federation, said this week that anti-Semitism has been surfacing in letters and phone calls to Jewish groups and in letters to newspapers.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 01:11 am
U.S. and Allied Efforts To Recover and Restore Gold and Other Assets Stolen or Hidden by Germany During World War II: Finding Aid to Records at the National Archives at College Park

prepared by:
Dr. Greg Bradsher
National Archives and Records Administration
College Park, Maryland

http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/appropriation12.htm
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 01:16 am
Thanks for giving this amouint of various sources and links.

And could you please now narrow it to what Sweden had to do with it?

Thanks.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 20 Feb, 2006 01:17 am
Thanks for giving this amount of various sources and links.

And could you please now narrow it to what Sweden had to do with it?

And how it is related to their plans becoming the world's first oil-free economy?

Thanks.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Sweden an oil free country by 2020?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/05/2024 at 01:33:56