sometime sun wrote:
I am of the mind and matter that existence really has to prove its self to me.
Before or after existence is proved am I proven me?
Being was never known until we knew not being, which we can never know
Something is only known because it is missing?
Something is only missing because it is known?
Being is only found by what is known not? Or is known?
'Is known not' only found by its being? Or is not found?
('Is not known' as much as 'Is known not')
Something is only not known because it is present?
Something is only present because it is not known?
Then; Is the known only found because it is not being?
Then; Is not being only found because it is the known?
Does being not know us then, or does it know only our being and not able to know its own, and us not knowing is the only way being can know?
Or not know?
What is being that is ours?
What is being that is not ours?
What is ours that is being?
What is ours that is not being?
What is not being that is ours?
What is not being that is not ours?
What is not ours that is being?
What is not ours that is not being?
Knowing 'can' then be the bliss as ignorance 'can' then be the horror?
You can't be proven. The other made you. You made the other.
The two can never be the same.
Reason knows: they must be one.
I know I know not.
I know not I know.
Thank you Arjuna, as always it is a Delirium.