So many claim to be scientific in their outlook who nevertheless say things that one learns is ANTI-Science in grad school.
This is true as can be about science :
" a series of observations which at one time were held to be important scientific facts, were a few years later completely discredited and committed to oblivion, without ever having been disproved or indeed newly tested, simply because the conceptual framework of science had meanwhile so altered that the facts no longer appeared credible." Michael Polanyi
and that is happening even this very month as Dr Leo Smolin argues for the Evolution of Scientific Laws, a view that C S Peirce ("the American Aristotle") had shown to be logically a consequence of strict Evolutionary thought.