1
   

There is a china teapot in its own orbit around the sun.

 
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 09:32 pm
HUMPH!

Well I want scientific proof then the teapot exists...

I assert that it most certainly must not because there's no scientific evidence to prove it! HA!
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 10:05 pm
Heph--

Have you never heard the bubble of boiling water?

Have you never felt the joy of the cup that cheers and doth not inebriate?

Have you never felt that there are events beyond human control?

Brew & Believe, Baby. Brew & Believe.
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 10:16 pm
Is this the bubble you live in?


Ummm only when that cup was filled with wine....


I control my world... no one else...


I'm brewing a theory here... that the teapot theory is a bunch of bologna based on the fact you can't prove it scientifically!


Whoooooooooo!
0 Replies
 
Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 10:45 pm
The whistle of the kettle beats the whooooooo of the non-believer anytime.

Scientific proof?

You might as well demand Intelligent Design!
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2006 11:51 pm
Re: There is a china teapot in its own orbit around the sun.
aktorist wrote:
Now imagine, however, that this teapot undergoes a sea change. Suppose it becomes an authority (out of its spout come forth important commands and promises). Suppose it becomes a source of comfort, as earthly teapots are, but more so. Suppose it becomes the focus of national identities: it is especially one of our teapots, not theirs. And so on: it answers prayers, adopts babies, consecrates marriages and closes grief. The teapot was cracked, but rose again and is now whole. It has achieved mythical, legendary, even religious status. It becomes crass to ask how bit it is, how its orbit is shaped, what china it is made of. These questions demean and belittle the teapot, and probably suggest sacrilegious intent on the part of those who insist upon them. Above all, it becomes a sin and shame to deny the existence of the teapot, whereas it is not usually a sin to deny the existence of anything.
I'd like to believe in pot luck
But at one time it was a crack pot
Once a pot is into crack
I doubt it can ever steep again
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2006 12:06 am
You know I've been thinking about this...

Since you are unwilling to offer me the scientific proof I request I will just have to deny the existence of the teapot...

Rather, I think you are mistaking the teapot for a train!


WHOOOO WHOOO!
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2006 05:57 am
time for a brew I think

just a thought

"Many orthodox people speak as though it were the business of sceptics to disprove received dogmas rather than of dogmatists to prove them. This is, of course, a mistake. If I were to suggest that between the Earth and Mars there is a china teapot revolving about the sun in an elliptical orbit, nobody would be able to disprove my assertion provided I were careful to add that the teapot is too small to be revealed even by our most powerful telescopes. But if I were to go on to say that, since my assertion cannot be disproved, it is intolerable presumption on the part of human reason to doubt it, I should rightly be thought to be talking nonsense. If, however, the existence of such a teapot were affirmed in ancient books, taught as the sacred truth every Sunday, and instilled into the minds of children at school, hesitation to believe in its existence would become a mark of eccentricity and entitle the doubter to the attentions of the psychiatrist in an enlightened age or of the Inquisitor in an earlier time.
-- Bertrand Russell, "Is There a God?"
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2006 12:43 pm
The dark side of the moon has a thick sultry coating of chocolate syrup and marshmallows, a warm gentle atmosphere, free beer, plus it's teeming with naked horny frolicking nymphs………… but only I can see it and lead you to the promised land.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jan, 2006 12:26 pm
well thats the orthodox view of course..
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jan, 2006 12:30 pm
Laughing
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jan, 2006 05:57 pm
hephzibah wrote:
You know I've been thinking about this...

Since you are unwilling to offer me the scientific proof I request I will just have to deny the existence of the teapot...

Rather, I think you are mistaking the teapot for a train!


WHOOOO WHOOO!

Can you disprove the existence of The Holy Teapot?
Of course not because It is real!
I have already proven Teapot with my ontological argument for Teapot, which noone has refuted!
But here, I will offer another.
This one is simple, and is Teleological in nature.

(1) Check out the world/universe/giraffe. Isn't it complex?
(2) Only The Teapot could have made them so complex.
(3) Therefore, The Teapot exists.

Or How about this one, a moral proof.

(1) Hitler didn't believe in the teapot.
(2) Hitler was a very bad person, and the Teapot is good by definition..
(2) Therefore, The Teapot exists.

Convinced yet?
Praise be to The Holy Teapot
0 Replies
 
Pauligirl
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jan, 2006 09:33 pm
Doktor S wrote:

Can you disprove the existence of The Holy Teapot?
Of course not because It is real!
I have already proven Teapot with my ontological argument for Teapot, which noone has refuted!
But here, I will offer another.
This one is simple, and is Teleological in nature.

(1) Check out the world/universe/giraffe. Isn't it complex?
(2) Only The Teapot could have made them so complex.
(3) Therefore, The Teapot exists.

Or How about this one, a moral proof.

(1) Hitler didn't believe in the teapot.
(2) Hitler was a very bad person, and the Teapot is good by definition..
(2) Therefore, The Teapot exists.

Convinced yet?
Praise be to The Holy Teapot


I have seen the teapot.
http://paulag.home.coastalnet.com/gifs/teapot.jpg

The world and its desires pass away, but the man who does the will of the Teapot lives forever.

So mote it be.

P
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jan, 2006 09:56 pm
trying to stiffle her laugh heph replies...

Hey starman! Get a clue!

Quote:
Can you disprove the existence of The Holy Teapot?
Of course not because It is real!
I have already proven Teapot with my ontological argument for Teapot, which noone has refuted!
But here, I will offer another.
This one is simple, and is Teleological in nature


Of course I can disprove the existence of the teapot! Simply because I don't believe in the teapot.

If the teapot were "all wise, and all knowing" as those who worship it say... then most certainly the "teapot" would be more than happy to prove itself to me! To show itself to me!

I have seen no proof. So therefore the teapot must NOT exist...

You simple minded people... willing to run after the silly rantings of those brainwashed teapot followers!

HUMPH! I snivel at such drivel...

Your ontological ramblings prove nothing except that you are brainwashed right along with the rest of those chocolate coated teacups!

Quote:
(1) Check out the world/universe/giraffe. Isn't it complex?
(2) Only The Teapot could have made them so complex.
(3) Therefore, The Teapot exists.

Or How about this one, a moral proof.

(1) Hitler didn't believe in the teapot.
(2) Hitler was a very bad person, and the Teapot is good by definition..
(2) Therefore, The Teapot exists.

Convinced yet?
Praise be to The Holy Teapot


Oh my, such a weak argument, coming from one who uses such "strong theory's"! I am disappointed to say the least. I think maybe you should just go hide behind your saucer, surround yourself with your little "teacup" friends, and pray to your most holy teapot. Maybe if you pray hard enough... you won't get burned when someone tips him over and pours him out! HA!
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jan, 2006 09:59 pm
But you haven't refuted any of my proofs.
Silly aTEAist
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jan, 2006 10:02 pm
GRRRRRRRR at Dok!!!! I'll get you for that!

Doktor S wrote:
But you haven't refuted any of my proofs.
Silly aTEAist


You call that proofs? Rolling Eyes To one such as I, who is very learneded in their aTEAism, there is nothing you could present as real proof of any such teapot existing...

So, you consider the world/universe/giraffe complex? And you say only The Teapot could have made them so complex? I don't think so!

Have you ever thought of the "Big Fart Theory" out there? Remember that one? The cosmo's farted and PLOP, we all came to be!

Maybe I lean more towards the idea of being farted into existence! It definately makes more sense than the "teapot" theory!

Hitler was a fart head...

Hitler stunk...

Therefore, Hitler was farted into existence....

It makes perfect sense to me!

181 posts... oooooooooh I'm getting closer every day! Whooooooo!
0 Replies
 
Doktor S
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jan, 2006 10:56 pm
Tetly 4:20 - "And the Teapot so loved the world that he have his only begotten teabag , so that whomever brews from him shall have eaternal cream and sugar."
The ultimate proof of Teapots love.
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Jan, 2006 11:59 pm
The book of Fartaramous 10:6 And the Cosmos so loved the worldeth that it farted it's only begotten farteth, so that whomever smelleth his stinketh shall have an eternal pot to poop on."

The ultimate proof of the Cosmos love.
0 Replies
 
Im the other one
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Jan, 2006 01:49 am
Man....you two silly, LOL.

Me like silly.
0 Replies
 
Treya
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Jan, 2006 03:05 am
BWAAAAAAAAAAA HAHAHA!
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Jan, 2006 08:45 am
Momma Angel wrote:
aktorist,

No offense, but is the best you can come up with? The word desperation comes to mind. :wink:

Name calling with no accompanying argument. He is clearly making a point by metaphor, challenging your position on God, which you are just as clearly afraid to respond to.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/07/2024 at 09:05:55