Hmmmm, I suppose I wouldn't mind a touch of anarchism now and then. I'm in if you'll have me.
Phoenix32890 wrote:dys- How can one be an anarchist and a liberal at the same time?
This is fantasy land, the happiest kingdom of them all.....
George wrote:Legalize anarchy!!!
We wouldn't want it if it were legal.
Good grief.
snorkle
We gotta get LittleK a tee shirt, bumper sticker and official badge.
i'm a.... i'm a..... what am i? liberal (human rights, freedom from state...) social democrat (collective rights and economy)? with a twist of realism (the moral realism, as defined by robert jackson) when it comes to international relations, but definitely a large dose of idealism and belief in international society ....
ah, i'm a tired one. i'll be whatever i'm told to be, as long as i can be in the campsite.
Well, in the words of Nixon, let me make this perfectly clear.
I really don't know what I am, but I do know this. Spelling and it's configuration is the least of my political and economic psyche.<smile>
I'll be right beside Dys in his anarchist, anti-christ, liberalism--in the way he defines it, although I don't think the human race is good enough to make it work.
But I won't follow him even though he has really sweet cheeks.
Diane, I agree. We are not good enough--collectively--to live up to the ideals, to actualize the potentialties, recommended and identified in Dys' propositions.
No comment regarding his cheeks.
This is where all the booze is at, right?
Well, i'm outta here . . . drunks are boring . . .
Well, I've never been called a drunk or boring. This is upsetting.
Is it really, really upsetting ?
not really, I don't really give a ****.
