0
   

defining one’s terms

 
 
Chumly
 
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 12:47 pm
I have noticed with a few posters, that there is a lack of defining one's terms, in combination with subtle criticism, an air of dismissiveness and an obstinacy to at the least entertain potentially merited precepts they do not already agree with. Kind'a spoils the fun a bit, but people are people I guess and there are others more energized.

Rant off boss Smile
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 728 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 01:03 pm
What do you mean by "lack of defining one's terms...?"
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 01:19 pm
In ANY argument, you must be extremely careful to define any notation and terminology that you use.

You must understand what it is that words denote, in order that by reference to this we may be in a position to test opinions, inquiries, or problems, so that our proofs may not run on untested ad infinitum, nor the terms we use be empty of meaning.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 02:04 pm
It's no good telling c.i. that Chumly.He,as his post suggests,doesn't know what defining terms means.
0 Replies
 
queen annie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 02:16 pm
I often cite dictionary definitions, from either dictionary.com or perhaps Webster's New World Dictionary, in my posts.

There are various applications and also effects from that which we call 'semantics.' Clearing the semantic slate with a common and 'accepted' definition from established dictionaries is beneficial to productive discussion, IMO.

Of course, there are always those stubborn few who insist on mis-defining according to personal semantics--possibly an obscure form of 'denial,' because, in doing such, there is an ability to forge on ahead wrapped in false ideologies which protect the complex matrix of comfort attachments on this inside of the mind.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 02:22 pm
spendi has an ego problem - attacking me on threads that has nothing to do with other issues in which we disagree.

As for "lack of defining one's terms," all one need to do is ask for clarification when needed. Is that so difficult? As queen annie stated, some people on these threads are stubborn enough to mis-define terms according to personal semantics.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 06:50 pm
Okay then c.i.

What does "stupid" mean when it is asserted about another person.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 06:59 pm
spendi, Look in the dictionary.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 07:16 pm
I'll look cop-out up instead.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 8 Jan, 2006 07:20 pm
Whatever pleases you.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jan, 2006 03:55 pm
Man, somtimes I think the best I have gotten from these thread is extra laughs, you people are funny!
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Jan, 2006 01:42 am
I should add also some seem to unearth emotional undercurrents that did not exist in with the original writer, that combined with a lack of defining one's terms makes for quite a roller coaster. Makes me wonder how many vauge interpretations take place in the written word, versus the face to face spoken.
0 Replies
 
Chumly
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Feb, 2006 01:47 am
queen annie wrote:
I often cite dictionary definitions, from either dictionary.com or perhaps Webster's New World Dictionary, in my posts.

There are various applications and also effects from that which we call 'semantics.' Clearing the semantic slate with a common and 'accepted' definition from established dictionaries is beneficial to productive discussion, IMO.

Of course, there are always those stubborn few who insist on mis-defining according to personal semantics--possibly an obscure form of 'denial,' because, in doing such, there is an ability to forge on ahead wrapped in false ideologies which protect the complex matrix of comfort attachments on this inside of the mind.
Well said queen annie, although it did take me a while to respond Smile
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » defining one’s terms
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 02:12:26