81
   

Things people posted that would make perfect sig lines

 
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jul, 2008 04:17 pm
gustavratzenhofer wrote:
The day shewolf tires of seeing naked bodies is the day the Pope develops a distaste for hosts. (or whatever those little white cookies are called)
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Jul, 2008 06:46 pm
While thrashing a demented rape advocating piece of garbage;
dlowan wrote:
I am sure they have victim support groups for men such as yourself.


This isn't one of them.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  2  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 05:31 am
Commenting on contributions to a thread about rape, Dagmaraka wrote:
boys would be speaking differently if a bulky body-builder was running after them with an anal massager. i would like to hear them say that he was right to pursue the 'negotiations' after the initial no.

Actually, Dasha is producing quite a lot of great sig lines lately.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 06:18 am
Actually, quite a lot of boys already are victims, and it feels no better for them than for girl victims.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 06:53 am
nimh wrote:
Actually, quite a lot of boys already are victims, and it feels no better for them than for girl victims.


yeah.

But nobody's currently posting all over the site that raping men is good.
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 06:58 am
that was actually the point. rape is rape, no matter who the victim is.

i was trying to get hawkeye to imagine himself in the victim's position, but i failed.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 07:11 am
dagmaraka wrote:
that was actually the point. rape is rape, no matter who the victim is.

i was trying to get hawkeye to imagine himself in the victim's position, but i failed.
If we should ever hear of his incarceration; I'll happily contribute 10 cartons of cigarettes...
0 Replies
 
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 07:12 am
dagmaraka wrote:
i was trying to get hawkeye to imagine himself in the victim's position, but i failed.

That's 'cause he's just a troll trying to get folks riled up.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 07:58 am
dlowan wrote:
yeah.

But nobody's currently posting all over the site that raping men is good.

dagmaraka wrote:
that was actually the point. rape is rape, no matter who the victim is.

i was trying to get hawkeye to imagine himself in the victim's position, but i failed.


Yeah, well, I appreciate your frustration, but then it's not a question of how boys would be speaking differently, is it? But of how these guys, specifically, would be speaking differently if they were in that position, isnt it?

I just dont like it if the thing's generalised in this "oh men would be speaking differently if it was them" way. It is already often enough them.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 08:01 am
unfortunately we HAVE to say that because, if you really pay attention to the rape laws, they really are geared to men and male aggression. Not women. Which also blows my mind. Women rape too. But the laws seem to only want to talk about rape that is possible by men as if men are the only danger to society.

It is almost sexist..
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 08:08 am
nimh wrote:
but then it's not a question of how boys would be speaking differently, is it?

I don't think the plural in Dagmaraka's quote was essential to what she was saying. She wasn't frustrated with all "boys" in the world, just with more than the one she was arguing with.

Perhaps the context to her quote is more important than I thought it was. If so, you may want toread the thread to get it.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 08:13 am
I read a couple of pages, but admittedly not the part where Dag's quote appeared in. I have no doubt that the positions Hawkeye and Agrote present are reprehensible and dangerous. Doesnt mean that people arguing against them cant still say things that in themselves grate. <shrugs>
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 04:59 pm
shewolfnm wrote:
unfortunately we HAVE to say that because, if you really pay attention to the rape laws, they really are geared to men and male aggression. Not women. Which also blows my mind. Women rape too. But the laws seem to only want to talk about rape that is possible by men as if men are the only danger to society.

It is almost sexist..



I can only surmise what you might possibly mean by this, or what laws where you are might look like to justify your saying this.

Here sexual assault is sexual assault no matter who does what to whom with what.

That male culture might cause males to be even more reluctant to come forward than women and kids are (presumably for fear of looking "weak" and un-masculine...which is a surmise supported by what the male sexual assault victims I have worked with have said....but males would know better than I on this point ) is not really an issue that sexual assault laws, as such, can address.

Given the number of sexual assualts that occur in prisons, the other big factor preventing men from reporting sexual assault is the prison culture of retribution via severe beatings, being especially targeted for sexual assault, or murder, for reporting anything to the authorities.

Anyhoo, most males get sexually assaulted by other males.



And I apologise for further de-railing this nice thread.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Jul, 2008 06:02 pm
dagmaraka wrote:

Quote:
which is why i'm not anybody's wife. salt your own darned beaver
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 8 Jul, 2008 03:45 pm
DrewDad wrote:
It is my desire that you experience a felicitous diurnal cycle on this, the anniversary of your expulsion from your mother's womb.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jul, 2008 06:06 pm
Intrepid wrote:
dagmaraka wrote:

Quote:
salt your own darned beaver

Ah bugger. Thats the one I came here to post. Foiled again..
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jul, 2008 06:26 pm
nimh wrote:
dlowan wrote:
yeah.

But nobody's currently posting all over the site that raping men is good.

dagmaraka wrote:
that was actually the point. rape is rape, no matter who the victim is.

i was trying to get hawkeye to imagine himself in the victim's position, but i failed.


Yeah, well, I appreciate your frustration, but then it's not a question of how boys would be speaking differently, is it? But of how these guys, specifically, would be speaking differently if they were in that position, isnt it?

I just dont like it if the thing's generalised in this "oh men would be speaking differently if it was them" way. It is already often enough them.


boys=agrote+hawkeye.... it's not like you, nimh, to comment without reading the context :wink:
0 Replies
 
caribou
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Jul, 2008 07:21 pm
boomerang wrote:
At the old house I used beer traps until I discovered how much my dog liked beer. The traps were always empty and my dog was always drunk.
0 Replies
 
mac11
 
  2  
Reply Thu 10 Jul, 2008 09:10 am
joefromchicago wrote:
His mind is open, to be sure, but only in the way that the American prairie was open: vast, unexplored, and empty.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Reply Thu 10 Jul, 2008 04:44 pm
Roberta wrote:
A person could plotz from such cuteness--and me without my antiplotz meds.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 06/15/2025 at 08:52:11