Phoenix wrote:
I once wrote that I believed that A2K was the world in microcosm. I do believe that I am seeing, in miniature, the same sorts of things that are pulling nations apart, and I don't like it at all.
I am sympathetic to what you are saying.. I apologize for my combative stance on religious threads which certainly adds to the dynamic you are talking about.
The key phrase in your post is "I believed A2K was the world in microcosm.". This is exactly correct. The division and bitterness you see on A2K religion posts are very similar to the real world.
In the real world we avoid open conflict, not by reaching any sort of agreement, but by separating ourselves into groups of people who think as we do, especially during worship.
I come from a very religious background and religious ideas are still important to me. Biblical references.. ideals of human value, compassion, morality are all things that I believe are part of a full intellectual life.
However I can't avoid the anger i feel toward a very public part of modern American religion. In these discussions I would like to be able to express this in an appropriate way.
To this end I feel that some of the discussions-- especially with Momma Angel-- have been very healthy even though they include quite strong disagreement. I respect that fact that Momma can ask for peoples opinion and take quite angry responses.
I ask you to read some of these threads looking past emotionally strong combative posts to what I believe is real discourse taking place underneath.
In short, I think there is valuable dialog happening in the religion forum. I feel that in addition to strong emotions, including anger, there is real dialog-- the sharing of naturally contentious ideas.
I understand what you are saying, Pheonix. I will try to keep this in mind, especially in the religion forum.
But conflict and emotions are part of what happens when people with very different ideas, backgrounds and beliefs come together to discuss something as personal as religion.
The solution in the world to have a "pleasant" religious discussion is to restrict yourself to one type of Church. Even in the real world if you bring a Quaker and a Southern Baptist together in a religious context for very long, sparks are going to fly. This is why we have separate churches for Quakers and Baptists.
I don't think having a "Mormon Spirituality" forum is very interesting. The fact that people get together to talk, even as sparks fly, is a good thing.
Don't miss the interesting, valuable dialog that happens underneath the conflict you see.