0
   

pardonable sin

 
 
LionTamerX
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:20 pm
I'm the other one wrote:
I was told that God will not condem one who is not in their right mind.

Puttin' my 2 cents worth in.

Wanda


I guess we are all off the hook then. :wink:
0 Replies
 
yitwail
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 10:31 pm
LTX, i wouldn't count on that until you see chapter & verse that says so.
0 Replies
 
Im the other one
 
  1  
Reply Wed 14 Dec, 2005 11:10 pm
Quote:
I guess we are all off the hook then


LOL!

Wanda
0 Replies
 
Im the other one
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Dec, 2005 08:57 pm
I suppose I should elaborate on my above statement.

I don't think God condems EVERYone who aren't in their right mind.

It depends on what the situation is. There's a difference on whether that person is insane by choice, which would make them not fully insane I guess...or the person who is deeply troubled per say, by demons and loses it.

Wanda
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Dec, 2005 02:32 am
Shocked No one is insane by choice.
0 Replies
 
mesquite
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Dec, 2005 04:59 pm
yitwail wrote:
LTX, i wouldn't count on that until you see chapter & verse that says so.

Don't forget to check the fine print.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Dec, 2005 05:19 pm
The most pardonable of so-called sins is Original Sin...mainly because of its non-existence and partly because it was performed by babies.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Dec, 2005 05:22 pm
Intrepid suggests that noone is insane by choice. There may be reason to believe that Nietzsche's "insanity" was chosen. Also the psychiatrist, R.D. Laing, suggested that the insane are not always lost; sometimes they are hiding.
0 Replies
 
Arella Mae
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Dec, 2005 05:24 pm
Babies? Adam and Eve were babies? Hmmmm.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Dec, 2005 07:01 pm
JLNobody wrote:
Intrepid suggests that noone is insane by choice. There may be reason to believe that Nietzsche's "insanity" was chosen. Also the psychiatrist, R.D. Laing, suggested that the insane are not always lost; sometimes they are hiding.


??? A person is either insane or they are not. If they are actually insane, it could not be by their choosing. If they did choose it, they are not insane. Simple, huh.
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Dec, 2005 07:02 pm
JLNobody wrote:
The most pardonable of so-called sins is Original Sin...mainly because of its non-existence and partly because it was performed by babies.


Could you explain this a little further, please?
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Dec, 2005 11:55 pm
I'm not at all qualified to defend the position.I only with to raise it. It may be that insanity is as simple as you suggest. Maybe not.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Dec, 2005 11:57 pm
I will suggest that Peter Gast, Nietzsche's close friend comment that during the ten years of Nietzsche's insanity it seemed that he was still himself, but a bit more so. And during Nietzsche's "sane" years he sometimes spoke highly of the positive possibilities of insanity. Maybe he just "tuned out."
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
  1. Forums
  2. » pardonable sin
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 01:47:30