1
   

Toynbee & McLuhan

 
 
coberst
 
Reply Sun 30 Oct, 2005 06:04 am
Toynbee & McLuhan

Arnold Toynbee wrote a "Study of History', which "is the longest written work ever composed in the English languageĀ…In it he traces the birth, growth and decay of some 21 to 23 major civilizations in the world."

"He argues that for civilizations to be born, the challenge must be a golden mean; that excessive challenge will crush the civilization, and too little challenge will cause it to stagnate. He argues that growth is driven by "Creative Minorities," who lead the uncreative masses by example (called "mimesis")."

"He argues that the breakdown of civilizations is not caused by loss of control over the environment, over the human environment, or attacks from outside, but from the deterioration of the "Creative Minority" (who leads the uncreative majority by example) into a "Dominant Minority" (who forces the majority to obey without meriting obedience). He argues that creative minorities deteriorate due to a worship of their "former self," by which they become prideful, and fail to adequately address the next challenge they face. He argues that a civilization has broken down is when it forms a "Universal State," which stifles political creativity."

"He argues that as civilizations decay, they form an "Internal Proletariat" and an "External Proletariat." The Internal proletariat is held in subjugation by the dominant minority inside the civilization, and grows bitter; the external proletariat exists outside the civilization in poverty and chaos, and grows envious. He argues that as civilizations decay, there is a "schism in the body social," whereby abandon and self-control replace creativity, and truancy and martyrdom replace discipleship by the creative minority."

In "Understanding Media" McLuhan notes Toynbee's "explanation of how the lame and the crippled respond to their handicaps in a society of active warriors. They become specialists like Vulcan, the smith and armorer. And how do whole communities act when conquered and enslaved? The same strategy serves them as it does the lame individual in a society of warriors. They specialize and become indispensable to their masters. It is probably the long human history of enslavement, and the collapse into specialism as a counter-irritant, that have put the stigma of servitude and pusillanimity on the figure of the specialist, even in modern times. The capitulation of Western man to his technology, with its crescendo of specialized demands has always appeared to many observers of our world as a kind of enslavement."

I argue that the ?'Creative Minority' consists of the university professors and the techno-graduates of our universities who have become specialists for Corporate America. These intellectuals have become ?'hired guns' for Corporate America.

These quotations regarding "The Study of History" are from:
http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/a/a/a_study_of_history.htm
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 733 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
Mills75
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Oct, 2005 12:24 pm
But university professors today are really nothing more than specialists themselves--to a large degree, they help legitimize the rule of a wealthy or power elite. I would argue that the "creative minority" has long since become the "dominant minority." In The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism Weber shows how a new class of wealthy arose in the early days of capitalism. Governed by the protestant ideology of that time which stressed thrift and wealth as signs of being among God's 'elect', the early capitalists amassed great fortunes. This process is exemplified in early America where there was far less conflict between the old feudal aristocracy and rising capitalist class. These early capitalists would rightly be considered the "creative minority" in America.

Their descendants have consolidated their power and resources, have largely ceased expanding economic opportunities from which the broader society may benefit, and in fact have arranged the economic system in such a way as to help continually redistribute wealth to the wealthy (i.e., themselves). In effect, the descendants of the early capitalists have become the "dominant minority."
0 Replies
 
Letty
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Oct, 2005 12:32 pm
McLuhan marking. and, coberst, welcome to A2K.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

How can we be sure? - Discussion by Raishu-tensho
Proof of nonexistence of free will - Discussion by litewave
Destroy My Belief System, Please! - Discussion by Thomas
Star Wars in Philosophy. - Discussion by Logicus
Existence of Everything. - Discussion by Logicus
Is it better to be feared or loved? - Discussion by Black King
Paradigm shifts - Question by Cyracuz
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Toynbee & McLuhan
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/20/2026 at 01:23:48