Quote:How could the situation get worse? Is there a special risk factor for you not wanting to get involved, or are is it just laziness?
It's not laziness, I just don't want to get my family involved, and I did not know who to report it to (it was night time, the person who owned the damaged property wasn't there at the time and I wasn't sure how long they were going to be there). Maybe this is some paranoia type thing, but I also did not want a revenge type feeling sparked over something non-harmful (in terms of people).
Quote:My perspective is this: if someone damaged your property would you want that person to run away without telling you anything, or would you prefer the person presents herself telling you what happened and taking the responsibility?
Yeah, you're right. Hopefully I'll do better next time.
Quote:The interesing aspect for me in this question is that it highlights the fact that "the self" is predominantly a social construction. Ray's dilemma is the result of "the self" having allegiance to different social networks..."society"..."the family"...etc each of which has different protocols, and also which "self" is the chairman of thinking committee. (Presumably a Marxist chairman would resolve Ray's dilemma with the ruling "property is theft "!)
Not quite, because to me morality is first among many things. It's just that in this case, I have more of a dillemma of whether to pursue something that could explode when there is no real harm involved, or letting it breeze by. Also, the family thing is whether I want to drag someone else into this or not before I know whether they want to be dragged in or not.