1
   

This one is for every riddle fan! Craven, Blaine, etc.

 
 
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2003 03:01 pm
What's next in the following sequence?

3, 5, 7, 9, ___

Scroll down for the answer



















































Yes, you already figured there is something tricky about it.
Actually, the sequence can be practically anything! Just as an example,
I will take the number 66 as being next in the ___. Yes, I know
you're going "Huh? I thought it is 11!" Well, it is, but it's also 66
and any other number you can think of! Here's why:

Let's say we have a function a(x), b(x), c(x), d(x), and e(x).

a(x) = (x-2)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)/((1-2)(1-3)(1-4)(1-5))
As you can see, a(1) = 1, a(2) = 0, a(3) = 0, a(4) = 0, a(5) = 0

We proceed like this with b(x)-e(x), but replace 1 with 2-5:

b(x) = (x-1)(x-3)(x-4)(x-5)/((2-1)(2-3)(2-4)(2-5))
c(x) = (x-1)(x-2)(x-4)(x-5)/((3-1)(3-2)(3-4)(3-5))
d(x) = (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-5)/((4-1)(4-2)(4-3)(4-5))
e(x) = (x-1)(x-2)(x-3)(x-4)/((5-1)(5-2)(5-3)(5-4))

Now the polynomial y(x) is going to go like this:

y(1) = 3, y(2) = 5, y(3) = 7, y(4) = 9, y(5) = 66

And here is how we do it:

y(x) = 3(a(x))+5(b(x))+7(c(x))+9(d(x))+66(e(x))

When this polynomial is simplified, we simply get:

y(x) = 55/24*x^4 - 275/12*x^3 + 1925/24*x^2 - 1351/12*x + 56

Try entering 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 as x into this polynomial and
gape at the unexpected results!
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 3,470 • Replies: 9
No top replies

 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2003 03:02 pm
This is why I'm concerned that sozobe's riddle does not present the unerlying logic correctly.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2003 03:04 pm
Oh but it does.
0 Replies
 
Craven de Kere
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2003 03:05 pm
Does it also exclude all other answers?
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2003 03:06 pm
Yep, there is one specific answer.
0 Replies
 
TechnoGuyRob
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2003 03:32 pm
sozobe, one answer is better than the other. There are infinitely many answers to your riddle, but I bet you have one that is better than the others, and that's what counts. We have thought of millions of ways to cure cancer, and all we possibilities, but some worked better than others. So far, we're still searching for better ones, because cancer is still a problem.
0 Replies
 
sozobe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 4 Apr, 2003 05:26 pm
Oh, just saw this.

No, there's one specific answer. I mean, by the logic shown here, it -could- be any number, I guess, but that's not what I have in mind with the riddle. One specific answer.
0 Replies
 
TechnoGuyRob
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Apr, 2003 08:45 pm
lol
0 Replies
 
laura nav nedu
 
  1  
Reply Sat 12 Apr, 2003 02:54 pm
Hi,

What is the puzzle you are talking about? Confused

Could you quote it for me?


Laura
0 Replies
 
TechnoGuyRob
 
  1  
Reply Sat 19 Apr, 2003 10:41 am
sozobe's number riddle (it's called "Number riddle I made up")
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Alternative Einstein's riddle answer - Discussion by cedor
Urgent !!! Puzzle / Riddle...Plz helpp - Question by zuzusheryl
Bottle - Question by Megha
"The World's Hardest Riddle" - Discussion by maxlovesmarie
Hard Riddle - Question by retsgned
Riddle Time - Question by Teddy Isaiah
riddle me this (easy) - Question by gree012
Riddle - Question by georgio7
Trick Question I think! - Question by sophocles
Answer my riddle - Question by DanDMan52
 
  1. Forums
  2. » This one is for every riddle fan! Craven, Blaine, etc.
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/18/2024 at 06:15:00