0
   

Former dissident fights for anti-discrimination law in Czech

 
 
nimh
 
Reply Tue 20 Sep, 2005 10:41 am
.. in the Czech Republic, I mean, of course.

Last year's article but it sounds good: good guy, good cause.

The anti-discrimination laws he described should have been up for a vote in the Czech House of Deputies today, keep an eye open on news if you see any.

Quote:
Keeping human rights in the spotlight
New commissioner battles skepticism on top priority: an anti-discrimination law


By Peter Kononczuk
Staff Writer, The Prague Post
Dec. 16, 2004

Svatopluk Karasek says he is under no illusions. His task as the government's new human rights commissioner is tough, and he is afraid of failure ?- not least because of the skepticism of certain members of the government.

Still, Karasek, 62, says his background is a good preparation for his job, which he took up in early December.

He is a former dissident, a parliamentary deputy, a Protestant minister and a musician equally at home playing in pubs and in churches.

Karasek says his top priority will be pushing an anti-discrimination law through Parliament.

His second will be to create a long-term plan to help Roma, or Gypsies, a community that is the subject of ongoing discrimination in this country, according to several critical reports by international watchdogs earlier this year.

"It could be that I won't be able to push through some of [my] ideas, something I have experienced in the past ... in the days when we had the feeling we were right, but there was no way to express it," says Karasek, who was a signatory of Charter 77, a 1977 manifesto criticizing the communist regime's human rights record.

http://www.praguepost.com/P03/2004/Art/1216/41216news9.jpg

Karasek got a taste of the difficulties at hand when he attended a Cabinet meeting Dec. 1 to discuss a new bill that aims to tackle discrimination against people because of their race, religion, gender, sexual orientation or age.

"When I went to the Cabinet office and saw all that skepticism, I asked myself whether this would not be just another ideal that would never make it to political reality," says Karasek, whom the communist authorities jailed for eight months in 1976.

In fact, the Cabinet approved the anti-discrimination bill, and it is likely to appear before the Chamber of Deputies in January.

"It will not be easy to push through," particularly because some government advisers are convinced that most of what is proposed in the bill is already scattered through existing laws, says Karasek.

The new legislation does not set specific financial penalties for companies and other institutions found guilty of discrimination: Any damages will be decided by a court, Karasek says.

Meanwhile, a proposal to set up an independent anti-discrimination office to help victims was rejected in favor of entrusting Ombudsman Otakar Motejl ?- whose job is to champion the legal rights of citizens ?- with the implementation of the new laws.

So will the new measures be without teeth? Karasek believes they will be effective.

He says that if enacted, the bill could prompt a change of attitudes and see more discrimination lawsuits being filed, even if he has no comparative figures for the number of past cases.

At the moment, "people in [this country] are not used to turning anywhere when discriminated against," especially in cases of gender discrimination. "The new law should change that."

However, time is pressing and the legislation is overdue, Karasek says.

"Way back in May, this law was a condition of the Czech Republic's entry into the EU ... and today the EU is already losing its patience and urges our country to finish this task." [..]

Dissident background

Karasek believes his background will stand him in good stead in his current job.

"Being a dissident was especially about human rights," he says.

Also in his favor is the fact that he is an MP and deputy chairman of the Freedom Union party, a junior partner in the coalition Cabinet.

"I can turn to [government] ministers and politicians. Some of them I know really well. With the interior minister [Frantisek Bublan], for example, we share memories of our work on Charter 77, so I can talk to him as an old friend."

One sacrifice Karasek will have to make as human rights commissioner is cutting back on his preaching at U Salvatora Church near Prague's Old Town Square, and on singing with his friends.

"Before ... we used to sing up to three times a week outside of Prague and used to return home late, at 3 a.m.," he says. "I do want to regulate this a little so that I can concentrate more on my work in Parliament and in my office."
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 547 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Sep, 2005 10:46 am
wot? czech republic has NO antidiscrimination legislature? or is it just out-dated? off to research...mui interesting.

...i know karasek. good guy. the old guard.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Sep, 2005 10:49 am
Almost forgot: I know a comprehensive antidiscrimination law was up for debate in Parliament today because Romservis reported the following, this morning:

Quote:
Anti-discrimination bill meets demands of current society

Prague, 19. 9. 2005, 10:00 (CTK)

A draft discrimination has a real chance of being passed by the Chamber of Deputies at its September session which opens on Tuesday, the daily Hospodarske noviny writes today. The bill precisely defines what is and what is not discrimination and it enjoys general support in the Chamber of Deputies, except of deputies from the senior opposition Civic Democrats (ODS).

Source (It has a link to "Full story", but it doesnt function)

CEC Government Relations in its "Early Warning System" on Czech policy, meanwhile, has two Anti-Discrimination Bills (866, 867) listed as pending in the Chamber of Deputies:

Quote:
Anti-Discrimination Bills (866, 867)

Purpose: The two bills introduce the EU anti-discrimination rules. Their goal is to prevent discrimination of employees in private companies that is based on their race, age, sex, religion, and sexual orientation. The bills introduce a strict ban on different wages paid for the same work in the same position. The Centre for Equal Treatment will be newly set up as an overseeing authority. The Ombudsman will also gain power to interfere in the employment policy of private companies in order to enforce the equality of wages.

Affected: All companies.

Timing: Approved by the government in December 2004. Passed the 1st reading in the Chamber of Deputies in February 2005. The parliamentary committee interrupted the discussion in May 2005.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 20 Sep, 2005 11:05 am
Hey Dag! Thought you would know him ... ;-)

This news item might be related - article wholly focuses on gay rights, but its the same law its talking about, I suppose, no?

(I'm hopeless with laws)

It would at least explain a possible absence of such a law so far - note how the law described here was tabled and narrowly rejected time and again throughout the past ten years..

Quote:
Gay partnership law likely

More than a decade after being proposed, equal rights could pass

By Andrew Steven Harris
Staff Writer, The Prague Post
September 14, 2005

For 30-year-old Markéta Krausová and her partner Petra, the question is simple: "I'm a human being, like you," Krausová said. "And if you can get married, then why is it that I can't?"

The Czech government may soon be answering that question. The Cabinet has approved a proposal to authorize registered partnerships ?- just short of marriage ?- for gay and lesbian couples, giving them virtually all the rights enjoyed by husbands and wives except for adoption.

The proposal now must go before Parliament, and if approved, to President Václav Klaus for his signature. Many Czech gays and lesbians would regard it as a quantum leap forward in their efforts to achieve equal rights.

"It's the first step in considering these kinds of rights in our society," said Petra, Krausová's 26-year-old partner. "It's really just the first step to say: We are here, and try to think about our community."

When the government planned to update its civil code on family law in 1995, the hopes of gays and lesbians soared: Political leaders supported a registered-partnership proposal based on the Danish model that excepting adoption would have given homosexual couples every right enjoyed by married people.

But by the end of the year, the registered-partnership bill was dead.

During the next 10 years, it resurfaced several times, coming within two votes of approval in 1997. In April 1999 it failed again. In February of this year, it fell short again, this time by only one vote.

Although Social Democrat Prime Minister Jiří Paroubek endorses the registered partnership plan, many political analysts suggest that the opposition right-wing Civic Democratic Party, which doesn't officially support the bill, will gain seats in the next parliamentary elections, putting the bill's future in jeopardy.

Renewing hopes for some, oddly enough, is the position of the Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia (KSČM). Though not historically a backer of individual rights, the party endorses the legislation.

"KSČM deputies will support the motion," said MP Václav Exner, the KSČM deputy chairman.

The bill would stop short of formally legalizing gay marriage, but registered partners could file joint tax returns, enjoy inheritance rights, get hospital visitation rights and access to medical records. Mutual alimony-style obligations are also included.

Christian Democrats (KDU-ČSL), without directly criticizing different sexual orientations, oppose the bill, arguing that state recognition of gay partnerships threatens traditional family values and child rearing.

"The vast majority of the party will vote against it," said Vilém Holáň, member of Parliament for the KDU-ČSL. "It is a question of principle: We want to protect the role of the family."

Read on...
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Oct, 2005 07:47 am
I set up a Google Alert to find out whether the law did actually get through; but instead, it now yields bad news from the neighbouring state, Slovakia:

Quote:
Slovakia bans positive discrimination

19.10.2005 - 09:53 CET | By Renata Goldirova EUOBSERVER / BRATISLAVA - Positive action providing advantages for people of an ethnic or racial minority group is to be banned in Slovakia, striking a blow against EU policy on the matter.

The country's constitutional court ruled on Monday (18 October) that such favourable provisions clashed with the Slovak constitution, as they "violated full equality before the law".

In practical terms, the ruling means that measures such as preferential access to education or the requirement to hire a designated quota of minority group members, such as Roma, would be illegal.

End of a long dispute

The court's decision put an end to a 15-month legal dispute between the Slovak government and the parliament, with the cabinet keen to dump Article 5 of the European Council Race Discrimination Directive.

The text allows the option of positive action and has been part of Slovak anti-discrimination law since July 2004.

The final verdict is seen as a victory for the governmental Christian Democratic Movement (KDH), which had at first opposed the entire anti-discrimination package.

Led by justice minister Daniel Lipsic, the Christian Democrats said that special assistance may be linked "only to social conditions, never to racial or ethnic origin".

"We need to get rid of building stereotypes based on race and ethnicity".

Roma angered

But Roma representatives called the legal ruling a "tragedy", saying it could slow-down existing anti-discrimination projects.

"Positive action is meant to be a temporary tool to improve Roma's start-up line", said the Slovak Government's envoy for Roma minority issues.

Up to 500,000 Roma are estimated to live in Slovakia, many of them still facing segregation and disadvantaged conditions in housing, education and employment.

End of story?

The sudden red light to positive discrimination in Slovakia is also a blow to Brussels' efforts to promote the idea of social inclusion.

Although not required to, member states are encouraged to take steps to ensure equal opportunities.

"It is definitely important to include minorities into society and prevent certain areas from becoming ghettos", the commission's spokesperson for social matters said.

The Czech Republic and the Netherlands are amongst those EU countries to have introduced measures of positive action, ranging from increasing the chances of Roma to find work to financial incentives offered to companies to hire immigrants.

No clue why they highlight Czech and Netherlands at the end; they seem hardly the best examples...
0 Replies
 
dagmaraka
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Oct, 2005 08:11 am
F**k. And I never curse. I really hoped this has a glimmer of a chance. They were pushing so hard. Man, I'm starting to despise KDH despite their efforts on Hungarian-Slovak cooperation and reconciliation... Grrrrr.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Oct, 2005 08:41 am
There's no chance left anymore, is there? I mean, once the Constitutional Court's decided, what can you do, can you still take it to the European Court?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Former dissident fights for anti-discrimination law in Czech
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 03/05/2026 at 05:29:59