1
   

The trickery of the human mind - Julius Fann, Jr ------Sep 23, 2012

 
 
jufa
 
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2026 05:24 pm
Because daylight cannot comprehend the reality of itself, as the human species cannot, what, then, in all individuals' inquiry of reasoning about Consciousness and the sanity or insanity of why it exists, incomprehensible to the human perceptive vision of answers? {*_*}

Because darkness cannot comprehend darkness, where then does mankind's knowledge to comprehend that which has no substance, find reasoning for the human perceptive to peer out from? {*_*}

Because the material world of human senses and intellectualism cannot conceive of their own logic or percepts because they have climbed the backs and rode the thought wave of other men, then advance those thoughts according to their human indoctrination, teachings, beliefs, and intellect. What questions can be asked, or preached, taught, or even politicize to other minds that are not lies? {*_*}

Each and every human question and perception depends on other perceptions to establish an immutable bridge of opinions, speculation, and beliefs of awareness within the wheelhouse of speculation to live. And because the human mind cannot comprehend all answers are before the question is, what, then, is the logic of human awareness that perpetually ask questions for answers when the foundation's axis never complete its rotation, in the dispensation of finite life when death halt that rotation that would lead one into answers? {*_*}

Because daylight and darkness must have an object of cause to express their purity, activity, and Spirit Inertia, how can the human perception, which has no subject vision of beginning or end give expressive answers on the object of its own Being? {*_*}

Each second which comes to life is the resurrection from the death of the preceding second of birth. Death, then, of the preceding second gives life's answers to the second which comes after, is a trickster upon the mind's understanding of what eternal life represents when the only second of Being is never a before or after the occurrence. Think about it! {*_*}

Never give power to anything a person believes is their source of strength = jufa
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 96 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
The Anointed
 
  -1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2026 05:35 pm
@jufa,
Quote:
Each second which comes to life is the resurrection from the death of the preceding second of birth. Death, then, of the preceding second gives life's answers to the second which comes after, is a trickster upon the mind's understanding of what eternal life represents when the only second of Being is never a before or after the occurrence. Think about it! {*_*}


Please rest assured in the fact that we will: "Never give power to anything that you believe is the source of your (SUPPOSED) strength."
knaivete
 
  1  
Reply Fri 13 Feb, 2026 10:33 pm
@jufa,
Instead of the illiterate spelling, grammar, diction and syntax, and prolix piffle, just state that,

consciousness doesn't explain existence.

Then be alerted that it doesn't have to,

and belief in ET supermen is not a logical concomitant, but instead an otiose, jejune delusion.



0 Replies
 
The Anointed
 
  0  
Reply Sat 14 Feb, 2026 05:14 am
@The Anointed,
Quote:
Each second which comes to life is the resurrection from the death of the preceding second of birth.


What makes you think that one second follow another? I was once told that a second encapsulates eternity, as in, it is not midnight at one second to midnight, it is not midnight at a half second to midnight, it is not midnight at a quarter of a second to midnight add infinity. where does one cease fractionalizing a second? When we reach Planck time?

Is eternity encapsulated in a second? In the deepest sense — yes. Not because a second contains eternity, but because eternity is not made of time at all. A second, a half‑second, a quarter‑second, a millionth of a second — these are all temporal divisions. Eternity is not a longer version of time. It is the absence of time.

Planck time, is where space loses meaning, time loses meaning, momentum loses meaning: Have we now reached the singularity of origin? We are describing the human attempt to reach a boundary that cannot be reached by dividing time, because the boundary is not temporal.

You can divide a second forever, and you will never arrive at “eternity,” because eternity is not the limit of time — it is the other side of time. So, “Where does one cease fractionalizing a second?” In physics, the answer is clear: You stop at Planck time, which is approximately: 10^{-43}\mathrm{\ seconds} It is the smallest meaningful unit of time in physical reality. Below that scale: Space loses meaning, time loses meaning, momentum loses meaning, causality loses meaning: Have we now reached the singularity of origin?

It is not that “time stops. It’s that time ceases to exist as a measurable dimension. So yes — Planck time is the final grain of sand in the hourglass of physics. You cannot cut time smaller than that without leaving the universe of measurable reality. But eternity is not Planck time, Planck time is the smallest physical moment. Eternity is the absence of moments.

Planck time is the last tick of the cosmic clock. Eternity is the silence after the clock stops. This is why the question is so profound: You can divide time down to the Planck scale but you will never reach eternity by division, because eternity is not the smallest time It is the absence of time, Eternity is not the limit of the sequence. It is the realm outside the sequence.


0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

What inspired you to write...discuss - Discussion by lostnsearching
It floated there..... - Discussion by Letty
Small Voices - Discussion by Endymion
Rockets Red Glare - Discussion by edgarblythe
Short Story: Wilkerson's Tank - Discussion by edgarblythe
The Virtual Storytellers Campfire - Discussion by cavfancier
1st Annual Able2Know Halloween Story Contest - Discussion by realjohnboy
Literary Agents (a resource for writers) - Discussion by Craven de Kere
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The trickery of the human mind - Julius Fann, Jr ------Sep 23, 2012
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 02/14/2026 at 08:18:12