Re: Fifth Amendment question
MrLucky77713 wrote:I'm doing some extensive research on the fifth amendment,a nd I was wondering what the author here (Julie Hilden from Findlaw.com) means by the following statement
I was also wondering what exactly, in this case, the federal rules of criminal procedure have to do with the fifth amendment.
Thanks!
Here is my take on this:
Let me define discovery by this general definition. Discovery is where both the Prosecution and the Defense basically lay their cards out on the table. Both sides show what all evidence and whatnot that they have in their bag. In your quote that states "I'll give defendants more discovery when they give me a deposition.": basically the prosecution is saying that they will hold some of those cards, and surpise the defendant in trial with that. You can say that the evidence is something that you just learned about or other shady methods of introducing "unforeseen" elements in a trial. They are doing this because of the lack of a good deposition, which a deposition is a pre-trial way of asking questioning a witness/defendant before the trial. This gives the person rope to hang themselves because you can then be impeached if your responses vary to the questions when given during trial. However your fifth amendment rights help you avoid answering questions in certain circumstances, which in this case leads the proscecution to withold certain elements when they lay all their cards out on the table during discovery.
I hope this helps. If you want to PM me feel free to do so.
Matthew