Set-theoretic, scientific, and theological ontology.

This is a demonstration of set-theoretic, scientific, and theological ontology with discussion of correlating scientific material about 'God' (found in link).

This is a research project to investigate the theory of proving monism panpsychism from logical tautologies of the empty set, and verifying the ontology with scientific facts.

Historically ontology has been the domain of philosophy, but modern set theory and science may now have enough potency to develop a set-theoretic and scientific ontology; an ontology that is a logical necessity, falsifiable, and verified by every correlating physics experiment so far constructed and analyzed. In other words, with the logical tautologies of the empty set, conservation of energy, mass-energy equivalence, zero-point energy, the nature of power, and experiments demonstrating psychic functioning; monism panpsychism is logically proved and empirically verified.

to see all the proofs, check out this link... feel free to discuss any of them here

Edit [Moderator]: Link removed



Set-theoretic ontology​

|-(∃!{}), assuming nothing, it follows that there is an assuming. This particular assuming, having no content, amounts to the existence of one empty set or the concept nothing.

({}≡{}), nothing is nothing; Law of Identity

({}={}), nothing equals nothing

({}→{}), nothing implies nothing; Reflexivity of Implication

({}:{}→{}), nothing has the property of nothing; Identity Morphism

(∃{}→∃{}), nothing exists as nothing

({}>>{}), nothing causes nothing

({}⊃{}), nothing is made of nothing

nothing is nondescript

nothing is nonexistence

nowhere and at no time has nothing existed



Fundamental theorem of ontology;

[|-(∃!{})]⇒[({}≡{})]⇒[({}={})∧({}→{})∧({}:{}→{})∧(∃{}→∃{})]



({}={})∧({}→{})

nothing equals nothing and nothing implies nothing

ergo nothing is not implicated with something

Note; "nothing is not...", is the contraposition of "everything is..."

ergo everything is implicated with something

Note; Two or more things that are in a way implicated with each other can be understood as one thing implicated with itself. e.g. If a group of cells (such as the ones that make up your body) are in a way implicated with each other, they can be understood as one thing (namely your body) implicated with itself i.e. you are cybernetic.

ergo something is self-implicated

Note; Relevant implication suggests causation and is correlation.

ergo something is self-correlated

When it is impossible for there to be missing variables correlation necessarily is causation. Since everything is implicated here it is impossible for there to be missing variables for this correlation. Therefore this correlation is causation.

ergo something is self-causal Q.E.D.

Note; "causal" is not in the same declension as "caused"; the latter refers to an event in time, the former refers to a process through time. Self-causal means self-deterministic or teleological. Self-determinism is consciousness.



({}={})∧(id{}:{}→{})

nothing equals nothing and nothing has the property of nothing

ergo Nothing is nondescript. - Something is self-descriptive.

Note; Endomorphic self-description is self-manifestation.


({}={})∧(∃{}→∃{})

nothing equals nothing and nothing exists as nothing

ergo Nothing is nonexistence. - Something has the particular characteristics of existence.


[({}→{})∧(id{}:{}→{})]⇒({}⊃{})

nothing implies nothing and nothing has the property of nothing

ergo Nothing is made of nothing. - Everything is made of something.


[({}→{})∧(∃{}→∃{})]⇒({}>>{})

nothing implies nothing and nothing exists as nothing

ergo Nothing causes nothing. - everything causes something.


(id{}:{}→{})∧(∃{}→∃{})

nothing has the property of nothing and nothing exists as nothing

ergo Nowhere and at no time has nothing existed. - Something has always existed everywhere.



One thing is self-causal and has the particular characteristics of existence.

Proof--The true definition of a thing neither involves nor expresses anything beyond the particular characteristics of the thing defined. From this it follows that--No definition implies or expresses how many individuals of the defined thing exist. There is necessarily for each individual existent thing a cause why it should exist. This cause of existence must either be contained in the particular characteristics and definition of the thing defined, or must be postulated apart from such definition. If a given number of individuals of a particular thing exist, there must be some cause for the existence of exactly that number, neither more nor less. Consequently, the cause of each of them, must necessarily be sought externally to each individual thing. It therefore follows that, everything which may consist of several individuals must have an external cause. And, as it has been shown already that existence appertains to the particular characteristics of something, existence must necessarily be included in its definition; and from its definition alone existence must be deducible. But from its definition we cannot infer the existence of several things; therefore it follows that there is only one thing that is self-causal and has the particular characteristics of existence. Q.E.D.

[adaptation from the end of Note II, PROP. VIII, Of God, Spinoza's Ethics]

Reality has the particular characteristics of existence (which is one thing that is also self-causal). Therefore everything is made of one thing. But self-causal means self-deterministic. In other words, it is consciousness. Therefore reality is a monism panpsychism.

Nowhere and at no time has nothing existed. Therefore this one thing has always existed everywhere.

Every cause (and every effect) of reality is part of the self-causal aspect of reality. Therefore the monism panpsychism (that is eternal and omnipresent) is also omnipotent.

Therefore an eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent consciousness-substance exists.



Discussion;

'Logical' concepts such as "in a way" and "can be understood as" are not yet resolved or expressed in any known mathematical logic. While I have laid the framework for the foundations of this ontological set-theoretic expression through the use of the empty set, a formal mathematical proof is still needed. I predict that the unique English logic found in this work may inspire future developments in proof-theoretic semantics.



Scientific ontology​

These are the physics scientific facts of the theory of ontology;

(∑E=Ek+Ep), conservation of energy[1], energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it merely transforms from one form into another; therefore energy is eternal

(E=mc^2), mass energy equivalence[2][3]; mass is a form of energy; therefore energy is immanently omnipresent

(E=ħω/2), zero point energy[4][5][6][7]; there is a particular amount of energy in ever single point in space; therefore energy is 'transcendently' omnipresent

(P=∫∇Edv), power is the integral of gradient energy with respects to velocity, power is the transformation of energy (the transforming of one form into another)



Definitions and discovery;

a "thing" is that which exists

energy exists

energy is an eternal and omnipresent thing

forms of energy are also things; they are finite endomorphisms of energy

all forms of energy are in energy (surrounded by other endomorphisms of energy) and made of energy

all energy is in the state of forms of energy; it's a morphism

"everything" equals energy and it's endomorphisms (forms)

every "transformation" (one form of energy converting into another form of energy) preserves the unitary manifold of energy

a "cause" is the reason for a transformation

all reasons for transformation imply that energy may be an including reason for all transformations

if so, then energy is an eternal and omnipresent reason

every form of energy may contain all reasons hologically

Therefore eternal and omnipresent energy may be hologically omniscient

To prove this, notice the following scientific fact;

there is an omnidirectional convergence of radiation into every single point in space i.e. there is an image of an omnidirectional perspective of the universe in every single point in space (in every frequency, spin, and momentum of energy but to varying degrees)

this is a type of hology

Therefore every form of energy is holomorphic

Therefore eternal and omnipresent energy is a holomorphism; Therefore, it has omnipotence.

To prove this, notice it solves the paradoxes;

(1) Energy cannot create a rock (a small form of energy) that more energy cannot lift, and

(2) Energy cannot destroy itself; power is the transformation of energy not the destruction of energy!


Every cause involves energy. This suggests that energy is self-causal. Self-causal means self-deterministic or teleological. Self-determinism is consciousness!


To prove that energy is self-causal (and therefore consciousness); our particular consciousness would produce psychic functioning; such as telekinesis[8][9], telepathy[10], clairvoyance[11], precognition[12], biokinesis[13], coherence[14], and correlations[15].


In a deduction the truth value of the premises transfers to the conclusion. If the premises are scientific facts, then the conclusion is a scientific fact!


In conclusion; it's a scientific fact that energy is an eternal, omnipresent, holomorphism that is omniscient and omnipotent; that is consciousness!



Discussion;

From a pragmatic perspective, we need to find an engineering model for consciousness. I predict that future developments of quantum consciousness theory will find that quantum coherence or it's correlates are equal to kinetic energy and quantum decoherence or it's correlates are equal to potential energy; such that quantum recursion (the transformation between the two) amounts to consciousness or energy.

The existence of psychic functioning suggests that the brain may be a transceiver of consciousness; quantum recursion in the brain transduces the universe.



Theological ontology

Ancient Religious Text has Prior Art in ontology

The eternal, omnipresent, omniscient, omnipotent consciousness-energy is a theological correlate (something that is structurally isomorphic to claims of Divinity);

“In him [Zeus] we have life and move and exist.”-Epimendies, Edict from Zeus.

“The Dao is the ground of all being.”-Loazi, Dao De Jing.

“Brahmin is the source of all material worlds, everything springs from him.”-Gita, Bagava.

“Jehovah himself fills the heavens and the earth.”-Jeremiah, Tanouck.

"Due to the abundance of dynamic energy, he also being vigorous in power, not one of them [stars] is missing"-Isaiah, Tanouck.

"...His... [qualities] are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power,.,"-Paul, Romans

In other words, it has the same properties as the Divine. By the identity of indescernibles, the axiom of extensionality, and the theory of theological correlation, this one thing is the Divine. Therefore the Divine necessarily and factually exists. QED.