0
   

We don’t have a science yet that deals with the present.

 
 
Jasper10
 
  -2  
Tue 18 Apr, 2023 03:19 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
No…….present philosophy;science and psychology doesn’t guess because it is aware of what is.

Modern day science is too preoccupied with the past and future and can’t see what is right in front of its nose.

Matter is exiting and entering many many holes at various timescales in the present and observations are confirming this.

This fact means that there wasn’t a single Big Bang and there won’t be a single Big Crunch either and the gravity theory which predicted it remains just a mathematical formula that has incorrectly predicted what is happening in the universe.

You cannot cancel out electromagnetic forces in nature.All you can do is vibratory balance them with the formula +/-=+/-

The electromagnetic fields which saturate the universe watch as matter appears and disappears at multiple points, so it would appear according to an alternative scientific prediction.



Jasper10
 
  -2  
Wed 19 Apr, 2023 12:51 am
@Jasper10,
An alternative science suggests that “PRESENCE” is influenced by electromagnetic fields.PRESENCE is not an electromagnetic field.

Electromagnetic fields create 2 forces that interact in the following combinations

-/-…-/+….+/-….+/+

Electromagnetic fields cannot be cancelled out.They can only be vibratory balanced adopting the formula +/-=+/-

Electromagnetic fields are associated with consciousness experiences.

PRESENCE can CONTROL which of the two consciousness states it resides within.It can engage or disengage from both the in and out of the moment consciousness states.

PRESENCE is not the 2 consciousness states.
Jasper10
 
  -2  
Wed 19 Apr, 2023 02:15 am
@Jasper10,
https://philosophy.stackexchange.com › questions › 43390 › is-philosophy-a-science
Is philosophy a science? - Philosophy Stack Exchange
No, philosophy is not a science. Science uses the scientific method to form hypotheses and then test them by gathering or generating empirical evidence. Most of the issues in philosophy are currently beyond the scope of those addressed by science - issues such as "what is knowable", "what is right and wrong", and "what is the nature of time". Share

The above statement is utter nonsense. Philosophy uses the scientific method as well but doesn't miss stuff out of equations like consciousness.

Whoever wrote this statement clearly knows nothing about PLAYER science but has been totally sold on SPECTATOR science.

How can you separate your self from science? We are totally embroiled within it.
Jasper10
 
  -2  
Wed 19 Apr, 2023 02:35 am
@Jasper10,
Modern day scientist will never understand consciousness until they transition from SPECTATOR science to PLAYER science and be AWARE that they are part of the game when it comes to consciousness.

You have to take part in the game to understand consciousness and the science behind it.
Jasper10
 
  -2  
Wed 19 Apr, 2023 04:20 am
@Jasper10,
And modern day spectator science ain’t gonna do that now is it because that would mean that it would have to accept that there is a 3rd controlling factor at play.

Uuuummm what a dilemma it has.
Jasper10
 
  -2  
Wed 19 Apr, 2023 04:48 am
@Jasper10,
Philosophy is the leading science, always was and always will be because it has AWARENESS and therefore understands consciousness and takes account of it in its scientific theories unlike modern day science which knows absolutely nothing at all about consciousness (AND FREELY ADMITS IT) and is totally UNAWARE and therefore doesn't account for consciousness in its scientific theories because it doesn't know how to account for it in its formulas.

Ask any modern day scientist and they will confirm this.

Consciousness is SPECTATOR's sciences "hard problem".
Jasper10
 
  -2  
Wed 19 Apr, 2023 05:19 am
@Jasper10,
Consciousness is not PLAYER science's "hard problem" that's for sure.
Jasper10
 
  -2  
Wed 19 Apr, 2023 09:28 am
@Jasper10,
"PLAYER" science disagrees with "SPECTATOR" science on one fundamental point.

AWARENESS is different to CONSCIOUSNESS.

"PLAYER" science takes AWARENESS seriously and sees it as separate from CONSCIOUSNESS.

What do I mean by this to prove my point?

Do you know what being in the present moment consciousness state is?

Do you know what not being in the present moment consciousness state is?

If you are not in the present moment consciousness state then where are you?

Can you bring yourself into the present moment consciousness state?

If you can then where have you been?

There are two distinct consciousness states.

I would suggest that you tune into them.

Be more aware of them!

PRESENCE IS AWARE OF THE TWO CONSCIOUSNESS STATES.
Jasper10
 
  -2  
Thu 20 Apr, 2023 01:14 am
@Jasper10,
The above maybe dismissed as irrelevant by "SPECTATOR" science. That's why it remains trapped in total unawareness.

"PLAYER" science takes note however and is able to transition from total unawareness to total awareness because it has the science to back it up.

"PLAYER" science understands how nature utilizes vibration in its construction and operation.




Jasper10
 
  -2  
Thu 20 Apr, 2023 09:18 am
@Jasper10,
The guess from modern day science is that good is bad and bad is good or 0=1 and 1=0.

This is not sound philosophy as this statement cannot be proved.

Good is Good and Bad is Bad could equally apply or 1=1 and 0=0.

As Good and Bad cannot be defined then sound philosophy suggests that all possibilities need to be considered.

If correct,then science/nature should confirm this principle with equal but opposite forces

It does, with the 4 off electromagnetic force interactions -/-…-/+…+/-…+/+.

In order to balance these forces the formula +/-=+/- needs to be adopted which provides a vibratory balance.These forces cannot be cancelled out.

Everything vibrates in the universe.

I would suggest that vibration is used for communication purposes in nature.



MontereyJack
 
  3  
Thu 20 Apr, 2023 01:37 pm
@Jasper10,
Gibberish
Jasper10
 
  -3  
Thu 20 Apr, 2023 01:52 pm
@MontereyJack,
No.Sound Philosophy;Science and Psychology for the present.
izzythepush
 
  3  
Thu 20 Apr, 2023 01:54 pm
@Jasper10,
Sez you and nobody else.

Zero people, because all you have is gibberish.
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  -2  
Thu 20 Apr, 2023 02:09 pm
@Jasper10,
Presently accepted past and future predicted scientific theories have failed.

The theory of gravity doesn’t work with multiple big bangs and big crunches at varying timescales which is what is observed.

Scientist know this already but are too embarrassed to admit it.





izzythepush
 
  3  
Thu 20 Apr, 2023 02:33 pm
@Jasper10,
Sez you and nobody else.
glitterbag
 
  2  
Thu 20 Apr, 2023 04:14 pm
@izzythepush,
Does this remind you of the Cheshire Cat?
izzythepush
 
  1  
Thu 20 Apr, 2023 04:15 pm
@glitterbag,
The Cheshire Cat had the decency to disappear.
0 Replies
 
Jasper10
 
  -2  
Thu 20 Apr, 2023 10:26 pm
@Jasper10,
Present science has PRESENCE separated from the vibratory balanced equal but opposite electromagnetic forces.

+/-=+/-

PRESENCE experiences these vibratory forces at the consciousness level in the form of in and out of the moment consciousness.

The consciousness experience can therefore be likened to a sinusoidal wave form.

Everything vibrates in the cosmos even consciousness.

So we have thoughts vibrating to the left and right and consciousness vibrating in between.

So we have dualistic reasoning to the left and right.

We also have the consciousness sinusoidal waveform in between

PRESENCE is not consciousness.PRESENCE is separate from consciousness.

PRESENCE needs to separate itself from consciousness

Jasper10
 
  -2  
Thu 20 Apr, 2023 11:13 pm
@Jasper10,
Presence is not a sinusoidal waveform.
Jasper10
 
  -1  
Fri 21 Apr, 2023 03:10 am
@Jasper10,
Modern day science's past and future predicted guess work theories assume that the electromagnetic forces between ALL spinning things in the cosmos cancel. These + and - forces don't cancel. They vibratory balance at both the macro and micro levels.

Having incorrectly cancelled out + and - forces on paper, modern day science has then proceeded to make up its own theories which observations are now clearly showing to be in error.

Tesla said the following on the theory of relativity in a 1935 New York Times interview: "The theory, wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors.

I believe he said it all.
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/22/2024 at 04:26:39