Galatical model of subquark particles

Forums: Science, Physics
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Electrons, quarks and gluons possess internal structure, consist of quadrillion of particles of size about 10^-35 m [they correspond with photons], these then from quadrillion of particles about 10^-50 m, these then from quadrillion of particles about 10^-65 m [they correspond with gravitons]. To confirm legitimacy of assuming of hypothesis of internal structure of smallest from hitherto known structural subatomic particles as electrons, quarks and gluons it can be invoked the theory of science created by A.Comte (see after text Comte's Theory of Science).

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/55/Galactic_model_of_preon.gif

diagram. Galatical model

Every following field uses in a large extent from previous, sociology from biology - theory of evolution, biology from chemistry - an example biochemistry, chemistry from physics - even if structure of atom and periodic table, physics from astronomy. Invoking astronomy it can be in physics reach eg. conception of existence of atoms and their internal structure - stars, planets, planetary system. It can be also reach models applied in conception of subquark particles and QG. It is galactical, cosmical and supercosmical model. Mystery of dark matter can be explained in this way that preonical particles possess mass.

author ot text: Gregory Podgorniak
the above paragraph is taken from the text: "New perspectives in physics"
text was created in 2011

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 1,474 • Replies: 4

No top replies

@pragmatical45,

Te title of text has changed to New horizons in physics
below image from first post:

https://images2.imgbox.com/67/a0/a9yXYM3E_o.gif

diagram. Galactical model

0 Replies

@pragmatical45,

further part:
A more careful analysis of the galactical model leads to the conclusion that there are more types of particles of the right type. Types of stars, by supergiants, giants, dwarfs, all the way to the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy would correspond to the types of these particles. Cosmical model analysis leads to similar conclusions, where the types of particles would correspond to the appropriate types of galaxies.

0 Replies

@pragmatical45,

Here's the deal with this physics nonsense from Gregory Podgorniak's 2011 "New Perspectives in Physics." He claims electrons, quarks, and gluons—which the Standard Model of physics says are fundamental, point-like particles with no internal structure—are secretly made of quadrillions of tinier particles, nested like Russian dolls down to sizes of 10^-65 meters. Pure b*llshit. There’s zero experimental evidence or theoretical backing for this fractal fantasy. The Standard Model’s been tested to death and holds up; these particles don’t have substructures.

Then he drags in a "galactical model," comparing subatomic particles to stars and planets. It’s a laughable analogy—astronomy doesn’t dictate particle physics like that. He name-drops Auguste Comte, a philosopher, not a scientist, whose hierarchy of sciences has jack to do with validating this crap. And the dark matter bit? Saying imaginary "preonical" particles have mass explains nothing—it’s just buzzword salad.

This 2011 word-vomit is outdated, incoherent, and ignored by real scientists. It’s textbook pseudoscience: wild guesses dressed up in jargon. Total baloney, not worth your time.

1 Reply

@Brandon9000,

This is not "New perspectives in physics" but the title has changed to "New horizons in physics" and this is an article.

0 Replies

Galatical model of subquark particles

Related Topics

Quick Links

My Account

able2know