Re: What is it LIKE to not believe in God...?
peace_is_good wrote:(Addressed to people who don't believe in God or Jesus)
I'm not asking this to be sarcastic or set people up so I can berate them for their answers -- I'm honestly just curious...
That's a good thing, because trying to "set people up" at this site could get you in deep trouble--you'd probably be way out of your league.
Quote:1. Is the BIBLE what turns you off of believing in God, or do you just not LIKE God, did you have a bad experience with a religous finatic, or is it the lack of scientific proof...?
This is more than one question. (1a) The bible (a word which simply derives from the Greek word for book, it merits neither capitalization, nor being shouted--which is what all caps means to people online) is derived from a variety of sources, many of which are older--most notably the Gilgamesh Epic. At many points in the old testament, the deity described is capricious, abitrary, violent, ill-tempered, self-indulgent, barbaric and puerile--certainly not an admirable figure. The new testament portrayal of the alleged Jesus has some serious warts, such as blasting a fig tree for having no figs (even though figs were not in season) and destroying the livelihood of an otherwise unoffending swineherd on a whim--two more examples of capricious and arbitrary willfulness. There is little attractive about the portrayal of the deity of that book, if one reads it carefully and does so without a pre-disposition to consider it a true account of a real being.
(1b) It is rather hard to say whether or not one likes god unless one knows what the putatitve god is like--and based on the bible, there is nothing very likable about that character. Furthermore, knowing that the book is the work of a primitive, bigoted people who were noting loathe to slaughter and enslave the innocent does not make their putative deity very attractive.
(1c) It seems hilarious to suggest that one would have a good experience with a religious fanatic, or a fanatic of any stripe. Fanatics rarely make good company, except for those who share their fanatical point of view.
(1d) The lack of any form of logical proof of the existence of a deity, let alone proof of a scientific character, gives me little reason to accept what appears to be nothing but the mumbo jumbo of frightened children.
For the first set of questions altogether, i simply note that there is no good reason i've ever known to believe in gods or goddesses, so i don't. As for the ultimate question, i simply don't care whether or not any god or goddess exists.
(2) What do you expect, that those who don't believe in a deity are people of truncated emotion, incapable of feeling joy, of appreciating their own or someone else's good fortune? This is perhaps the most idiotic and insulting of your questions.
(3) The same way all other humans deal with misfortune--by working to overcome any deficient circumstance and getting on with life.
(4a) This seems an awfully silly question. To what would someone pray were there no deities evident to him or her?
(4b) This assumes that prayer fulfills a common human need without which the person is incomplete. That also seems awfully silly. Certainly those who are without deities would have occasion to boost their own self-confidence, and it is once again insulting that you don't seem to understand that people who do not have your belief set are capable of positive thoughts and actions. The sort of arrogance which assumes that other people are incomplete or incapable of positive thought or action without sharing superstitious belief is one of many things deplorable about fanatical religionists.
(5) I treat other people well unless and until they give me reason to act otherwise. I am motivated by the understanding that none of us is capable of living well without the help of others and that participation in a civil society requires civility of me no less than of others.
(6) Once again you present an insulting picture of people incapable of dealing with the world without resort to superstitious behavior. The things which might frighten me over which i can exert no control would have to be described in detail before i could answer such an otherwise silly question. To what do you refer? Fear of death? Fear of assault and bodily harm? You need to make that nonsense clearer if you hope for a reasonable answer.
(7) No.
(8) Yes. (As a side note, anyone condemning me because i don't subscribe to their superstitious belief set would be ignored.)
(9) This is another fairly incoherent question. Someone who made such a decision wouldn't be the object of your questions, now would they?
(10) I would consider it an exercise in childish fantasy to believe something simply because it is an attractive idea--which is pretty much how i see theists in the first place.