6
   

Joe Rogan vs Neil Young: a speech / marketplace issue

 
 
Linkat
 
  0  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 08:43 am
@Linkat,
I see I got all these down votes I'd rather people voice what I said wrong or where they disagree.

I am not saying the overall medical field and scientists trying to resolve this aren't doing their best or misleading just this is all new an evolving.

The one thing this forum tends to miss is to be open minded and look at both sides. I don't agree with Rogan but he has every right to state what he feels as long as he dies not proclaim something he isn't. What kind of country are we if we shut up everyone we disagree with. Now spotify on the other hand can pull him as it is their freedom to have whoever they want involved in their business as well. And young and others can do want tgey what they are doing in protest. Its called being free.
Linkat
 
  0  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 08:52 am
@engineer,
Agreed exactly and I have not posted anything different. Just want too add people find this Rogan is saying things that could be harmful to others health and that is why he should be pullled. Agreed if he claims he is an expected has a certain licence etc that he does not have. We can all make our own decision if we are dumb enough to follow some guy with no expertise then shame on us. We are not being forced.

Yelling fire is different as anyone is capable of knowing if there is a fire ...

I do agree that he deserves pushback but not forced to stop saying what he wants. We all have the freedom to voice against him as well in that same vain. t is up to spotify for business reasons whether want to keep him or not.
0 Replies
 
neptuneblue
 
  -1  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 09:17 am
The problem with Joe Rogan…and white boys
Michael Harriot

January 21, 2022·13 min read

OPINION: A group of researchers, doctors and medical experts expressed concerns about the Spotify podcaster’s willingness to spread COVID misinformation. But no one cared when people raised those red flags about Rogan’s willingness to spread white supremacy.

If you’re reading this piece (and you are reading it, I can tell), you should understand what this piece will not be.

You are not about to read about how Joe Rogan is racist. You aren’t going to read how Rogan isn’t funny or even deserving of being considered the most influential podcaster of all time. However, I cannot, in good conscience, declare that I am unbiased when it comes to Spotify’s $100 million white man because of one fact:

I like Joe Rogan.

Perhaps “like” is too austere a word. I’ve paid to see him perform live. I have listened to hundreds of episodes of The Joe Rogan Experience and that number may well reach four digits if you include podcasters in the Rogan comedy universe such as Ari Shaffir, Tom Segura and Joey Diaz. I’ve heard Rogan speak about growing up in liberal San Francisco, living in Florida and spending his teenage years near Boston, which seems to have created a diverse set of interests, from mixed martial arts to Egyptology to dick jokes. My unvarnished opinion of Rogan is that he seems to be extremely interested in things and not just on a facile level. To be fair, I haven’t really listened to his podcast since he became exclusive to Spotify.

Still, there is no question that he created the most powerful platform in podcasting and may very well be the most powerful person in all of media. His estimated audience nearly triples Tucker Carlson’s, dwarfs all three networks’ late-night talk shows combined and, when Rogan’s YouTube views are included, his audience rivals The Oprah Winfrey Show at the height of its popularity. Plus, Rogan has cultivated a legion of young, mostly white, mostly male fans who have exalted him to a level that ranks somewhere between a guru and a renaissance man.

Rogan’s status as a counterculture icon of libertarian white boys who wear Ed Hardy shirts to jujitsu practice is why last week a “coalition of scientists, medical professionals, professors, and science communicators spanning a wide range of fields such as microbiology, immunology, epidemiology, and neuroscience” wrote an open letter to Spotify about Rogan’s “concerning history of broadcasting misinformation, particularly regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.” The letter didn’t ask Spotify to censor or ban Rogan. Instead, they wanted to express their concern over Spotify’s “failure to mitigate the damage it is causing.”

But even before he became the official COVID consultant to NFL quarterback Aaron Rodgers and other prominent celebrities who weren’t worried about the coronavirus until they tested positive for the coronavirus, Rogan wasn’t shy about sharing his belief that young, healthy people like himself didn’t have anything to worry about when it came to COVID. Even though most people aren’t as healthy as Rogan, according to the data, he was statistically correct. More than 80 percent of the people who died from COVID were over 65, and many more had comorbidities. Then again, only 10 to 20 percent of smokers get lung cancer and most people survive gunshot wounds to the chest. But there’s a reason Rogan is so fearless about saying what doctors around the world will never tell you:

Joe Rogan is not a doctor.

In fact, Rogan has the same medical expertise as a monkey or a man who makes a living describing face kicks. Because Rogan’s job is to say things and a doctor’s primary role is to make sure each one of their patients doesn’t die, very few physicians would advise their patients to puff Newports while taking a slug to the torso. That’s why we rarely hear actual doctors say: “In my medical opinion, you’ll prolly be aight.”

Then Rogan got the ‘rona.

After he apparently cured himself with ivermectin, monoclonal antibodies and advanced medical care not available to people who don’t have the resources to move halfway across the country when they want “a little bit more freedom,” the comedian and UFC commentator would never be the same. He ranted about how ivermectin was not horse paste, blasted CNN and responded to public criticism by inviting COVID quacks on his show, most notably with Dr. Robert Malone, a scientist who has been banned from Twitter for spreading debunked medical misinformation during a global pandemic. During the Dec. 31 episode of Rogan’s show, Malone attributed the public’s acceptance of the world medical community’s consensus opinion to the debunked theory of “mass formation hypnosis.” Two weeks later, Rogan’s audience watched him chuck his usual evidence-based open-mindedness into the wind when his argument that the vaccine was worse than COVID was upended by peer-reviewed research in real time. Even as he read the words written by people who know stuff, Rogan could not accept the objective facts, much to the lament of some of his actual fans who clearly saw the cognitive dissonance.

For almost any other podcaster in America, this pattern of white wackadoodle doo would be laughable, but COVID broke Rogan. Part of his thing was that he was always open-minded, unbiased and would often verify the most innocuous fact. I’ve heard him dismantle the argument that the moon landing was fake, that vegans are healthier and that monkeys eating psychedelic mushrooms are what made the human brain evolve (Luckily, another Rogan guest explained that mushrooms clearly came from aliens).

“By allowing the propagation of false and societally harmful assertions, Spotify is enabling its hosted media to damage public trust in scientific research and sow doubt in the credibility of data-driven guidance offered by medical professionals,” read the letter. “Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, Rogan has repeatedly spread misleading and false claims on his podcast, provoking distrust in science and medicine. He has discouraged vaccination in young people and children, incorrectly claimed that mRNA vaccines are “gene therapy,” promoted off-label use of ivermectin to treat COVID-19 (contrary to FDA warnings), and spread a number of unsubstantiated conspiracy theories.

“Mass-misinformation events of this scale have extraordinarily dangerous ramifications,” the letter continued. “This is not only a scientific or medical concern; it is a sociological issue of devastating proportions and Spotify is responsible for allowing this activity to thrive on its platform.”

When the physicians noted how they “bear the arduous weight of a pandemic that has stretched our medical systems to their limits,” in the letter, I knew exactly how they felt. When the researchers spelled out how they “face backlash and resistance,” a lot of Black people knew exactly how the experts felt because many of us have pointed out this problem for years.

I do not believe Joe Rogan is a white supremacist.

However, along with an interest in psychedelic drugs, recreational choking and chimpanzees, Rogan has always held a fascination with white supremacists. Long before a makeshift militia was indicted for attempting a coup on the American legislature, Rogan hosted a sit-down with Gavin McInnes, founder of a then-unknown group called the Proud Boys. He has welcomed people who dabble around the periphery of the alt-right, such as Peter Boghossian, who was one of the founders of the “grievance studies” hoax that evolved into the demonization of critical race theory. Right-wing troll Chuck C. Johnson has made it to the JRE along with Jordan Peterson who The Guardian notes, “attracts a heterogeneous audience that includes Christian conservatives, atheist libertarians, centrist pundits and neo-Nazis.” Rogan has also entertained the musings of far-right provocateurs like Milo Yiannopoulos and Stefan Molyneux, two of the handful of JRE guests who promote the long-debunked “race science” belief that people of African descent have lower IQs.

In all fairness, most episodes of The Joe Rogan Experience are not a three-hour discourse on the intellectual and social inferiority of people who don’t listen to Joe Rogan. Rogan sometimes openly disagrees with his guests and often pushes back against many of their ideologies. He believes that thoughts shouldn’t be censored, which is a valid point. But Rogan isn’t having a conversation with these guests in his living room over a joint and a cup of Bulletproof coffee; he’s asking them to speak into a microphone and talk, unfiltered, to tens of millions of people, many of whom are probably dumber than Rogan. And, while I don’t consider Rogan to be especially intelligent, he is probably more open-minded, more progressive and more informed than many of his listeners. Yet, his congenial, constantly curious personality sometimes makes it seem as if he agrees with what his guests are saying.

Moreover, in many cases, Rogan is just not intellectually equipped to challenge many of his guests’ ideas—especially ones that have formed debunked ideas based on faulty research, personal prejudice and anecdotal evidence. For instance, before he migrated to Spotify, Rogan was obsessed with the lawsuit accusing Harvard of discriminating against Asian Americans. He repeatedly asserted that, by denying students who tested higher on standardized tests, the Ivy League institution’s admissions policy was “racist,” which was a good point…

But Rogan never mentioned the fact that research shows “wealthy students enjoy significant advantages throughout the college application process, and that income greatly impacts a student’s performance on standardized tests.” Rogan probably didn’t know that Asian Americans have the highest income in America. He didn’t acknowledge that most Black students attend underfunded, high-poverty schools that don’t have the same academic resources and curriculums. He didn’t consider the fact that standardized tests don’t accurately measure college success. He never spoke about the right of private institutions to curate a diverse academic environment because it more accurately reflects the real world. He never even quantified what he meant by “best students.” Rogan never even mentioned that the people who overcome disparities might be better students than those who graduate from the best schools, have the best test preparation money can afford and have been guided by people who know how to get into Ivy League schools. More importantly, he never considered that these disparities prove that white supremacy exists. However, there is a good reason for this:

Joe Rogan didn’t know what he was talking about.

He was just saying things. Into a microphone. To millions of people. Because he can. Because that’s what white boys get to do. As with COVID, Rogan and his minion of bearded free-thinkers who used-to-be-libertarian will never be substantially affected by the deadly virus of white supremacy. It is disingenuous at best and outright stupid at worst for someone as famous as Rogan to pretend that he is allowing his listeners to explore ideas without acknowledging the actions these positions can inspire and the harm these racist concepts cause in real life. Although Rogan may feel like the prototypical everyman, his guests know that millions of people are listening. Even if 1 percent of Rogan’s listeners are radicalized by a JRE guest, it means hundreds of thousands of people have been converted to a baseless philosophy thanks to Rogan’s pulpit.

It might be interesting for him to sit down with author Abigail Shrier to discuss The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters because Rogan or his children probably won’t be murdered by a transphobic bigot. It’s probably interesting to debate if white people are genetically more intelligent than sub-Saharan Africans because he doesn’t have to wonder if his kid’s teacher or his cousin’s employer saw that Rogan clip and reached a different conclusion. Far too many times, white boys will say something idiotic or harmful and wipe away the prospect of being held accountable by saying: “I’m just asking questions!” It’s a neat trick, really. It’s as if the entire universe is an Etch A Sketch for white boys to shake and erase the consequences of their actions. What could possibly be wrong with asking questions?

White boys are free to poke, prod and play around with the poisonous snake of white supremacy because they are born with natural immunity to its venom. They can publicly ruminate about how disenfranchised people should combat voter suppression with “personal responsibility.” They can sit on a Supreme Court and decide what women should do with their vaginas because they will never be forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy to full term. They can explain why Black people should just comply with police officers instead of running away because they have never been paralyzed by the fear of living in a country where they are hunted by people armed with guns and the authority of a legal system.

Perhaps the greatest example of this is Rogan’s fascination with tossing around the n-word as if it were a lit firecracker and not a piece of dynamite. For Rogan, it is not a piece of dynamite. It does not conjure up the memories of his grandparents with nooses around their necks or the wealth stolen from everyone who will ever be in his family or the non-memories of cousins whose existences were snuffed out before they began. Watch him giggle while kicking the history of a people’s pain around as if it is a game of cornhole or a theoretical hackysack.

And no, Joe Rogan is not a white supremacist.

Rogan is just a man who built a soapbox on which he allows white supremacists to stand. Of course, some people will claim that holding Rogan accountable for the stage he built is “cancel culture.” But do not weep, my child; if there’s anyone who can’t be canceled, it’s Joe Rogan and white boys like him. If all else fails, he’ll be forced to earn millions of dollars performing comedy around the country while hosting his podcast on his own, where his pre–Spotify audience was even larger. White boys will never lose their freedom to speak, even if they claim they are just asking questions and exposing ideas to the public.

“Public opinion is a sort of atmosphere, fresh, keen and full of sunlight…and this sunlight kills many of those noxious germs,” wrote Supreme Court justice and free speech advocate Louis Brandeis. “Selfishness, injustice, cruelty, tricks and jobs of all sorts shun the light; to expose them is to defeat them.” Brandeis—a “militant crusader for social justice”—wrote volumes of fearless opinions on every social, political and economic issue—except for one. Whenever a case involved Black people, Brandeis would become curiously silent. In 23 years on the Supreme Court, he did not write a single opinion on the “race question.”

Louis Brandeis was not a white supremacist.

Just because he repeatedly voted in support of segregation, voted in favor of the Klan and helped elect a white supremacist president doesn’t mean Brandeis was wrong. Speech should be free, sunlight is the best disinfectant for toxic ideas and Joe Rogan is a bright and shining star.

But Joe Rogan is not the sun.

Of course, I could be biased.

Remember, I like Joe Rogan.

https://www.yahoo.com/video/problem-joe-rogan-white-boys-195152274.html

hightor
 
  1  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 09:28 am
More on a story that Mame posted on the last page:

Joe Rogan apologises for using N-word and racist Planet of the Apes story

Quote:
The podcast host Joe Rogan has offered “sincere and humble apologies” after footage emerged of him repeatedly using the N-word on his hit show.

The comedian, 54, who has a lucrative deal with the streaming giant Spotify, said it was the “most regretful and shameful thing” he has ever had to speak about, but stressed the clips were “taken out of context”.

Rogan has come under fire recently for sharing coronavirus misinformation on his hugely popular podcast The Joe Rogan Experience.

Prominent musicians including Neil Young and Joni Mitchell have withdrawn their music from the service over its decision to continue hosting the show, which was reportedly acquired for more than $100m (£77m) in 2020.

The musician India Arie has also announced she would leave the streaming service in protest, saying she objected to Rogan’s “language around race”.

She shared an edited compilation of clips of Rogan using the N-word more than 20 times on her Instagram account.

Addressing the montage in a video posted on his own Instagram account, Rogan said: “I’m making this video to talk about the most regretful and shameful thing that I’ve ever had to talk about publicly.

“There’s a video that’s out, that’s a compilation of me saying the N-word. It’s a video that’s made of clips taken out of context of me of … 12 years of conversations on my podcast, and it’s all smushed together, and it looks fuckin’ horrible, even to me.

“Now I know that to most people there’s no context where a white person is ever allowed to say that word, never mind publicly on a podcast, and I agree with that.”

“Now, I haven’t said it in years, but for a long time, when I would bring that word up, like if it would come up in conversation, instead of saying ‘the N-word’, I would just say the word.

“I thought as long as it was in context, people would understand what I was doing.”

Rogan said in some of the clips in the compilation he was quoting other people or referring to the title of a Richard Pryor comedy album, and in another instance he is discussing how it is “an unusual word”, adding: “It’s a word where only one group of people is allowed to use it, they can use in so many different ways. But it’s not my word to use, I’m well aware of that now.”

Rogan also addressed a clip that Arie shared of him telling an anecdote in which he appeared to compare being around black people with the film Planet of the Apes.

He said: “I was telling a story in the podcast about how me and my friend Tommy and his girlfriend, we got really high, we’re in Philadelphia, and we went to go see Planet of the Apes.

“We didn’t know where we were going, we just got dropped off by a cab, and we got dropped off in this all-black neighbourhood.

“And I was trying to make the story entertaining and I said: ‘We got out, and it was like we were in Africa, like we were in Planet of the Apes.’

“I did not, nor would I ever, say that black people are apes, but it sure fuckin’ sounded like that.

“And I immediately afterwards said: ‘That’s a racist thing to say.’”

Rogan said he had deleted the podcast and admitted it was “an idiotic thing to say”, adding: “I was just trying to be entertaining. I certainly wasn’t trying to be racist, and I certainly would never want to offend someone for entertainment with something as stupid as racism.”

He added:

“My sincere and humble apologies. I wish there was more that I could say.”

Rogan has previously attracted controversy for suggesting that the young and healthy should not get vaccinated.

guardian
Lash
 
  1  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 10:11 am
@neptuneblue,
That was a very insightful piece—took a turn toward the end, thinking this was a ‘white boy’ thing.

I listen to interesting black men podcasts, speaking their opinions. If they make it to Rogan status, maybe they’ll be questioned a little closer about their views.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 10:14 am
@hightor,
For a while, I used the actual word when discussing ‘the N word’ because I thought if I used the actual F word when discussing that word, it was silly not to do the same with the N word.

I’ve never once in my life used ‘the N word’ to refer to a person.

I definitely understand Rogan’s thought process on that issue. He, and I, thought better about it.
engineer
 
  2  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 10:32 am
@Linkat,
Linkat wrote:

I see I got all these down votes ...

There is someone running a bot farm to impact voting out there. I wouldn't sweat it.
izzythepush
 
  0  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 10:36 am
@engineer,
It has been going on for a very long time, it's nonono, who was banned a very long time ago.

He has no life so he spends his days doing this.

Some of us also get abusive pms.

He was banned for two years in 2018. When he came back he lasted two days, most of us had forgotten who he was, but he can't forget us.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 10:56 am
Related article: Young massing audience for Amazon.
https://www.wsj.com/amp/articles/neil-young-pushes-amazon-music-to-fans-after-pulling-music-from-spotify-amid-joe-rogan-controversy-11643641915
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 10:59 am
@Lash,
Rogan wrote:
“Now I know that to most people there’s no context where a white person is ever allowed to say that word, never mind publicly on a podcast, and I agree with that.”

“Now, I haven’t said it in years, but for a long time, when I would bring that word up, like if it would come up in conversation, instead of saying ‘the N-word’, I would just say the word.

“I thought as long as it was in context, people would understand what I was doing.”


Lash wrote:
For a while, I used the actual word when discussing ‘the N word’ because I thought if I used the actual F word when discussing that word, it was silly not to do the same with the N word.

I’ve never once in my life used ‘the N word’ to refer to a person.


I totally understand this usage. Especially when used in the context of exploitative working conditions and ill treatment of laborers. I think the idea that the word can not be uttered under any circumstances is absurd, as if it had some sort of occult power to do evil. In a similar vein, I think Goldberg has the right to her own interpretation of the Holocaust. But using the N term or stating a non-conforming belief about the Holocaust on a media platform is, as you suggested about Whoopi yesterday, S T U P I D.

Samuel Beckett wrote:
No use indicting words; they are no shoddier than the ideas they peddle.
Lash
 
  2  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 11:04 am
@hightor,
I would say that saying the Holocaust wasn’t about race is stupid—factually incorrect, and saying the N term is tone deaf and insensitive.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  2  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 12:01 pm
@engineer,
engineer wrote:

You are contending that free speech means the right to have your opinions amplified on any platform, so if for example you are a flat Earth proponent, ABC should carry your opinions at equal weight with those of scientists saying the Earth is round. Were ABC to do that, I would call them out on it. I contend that free speech is your right to say what you want and if I disagree I will say what I want, but free speech is not a get out of jail free card and there is certainly no right for you to push your way into any forum and broadcast as you wish. (Certainly on A2K, there are rules and if you run afoul of them, your posts are removed. Is that curtailing your free speech? Do you think A2K must publish any opinion regardless of content?) You are open to critique on your opinions and if you are spreading misinformation, you should face pushback. There has always been an axiom that free speech does not allow you to yell falsely yell fire in a crowded theater. Do you agree with that? Do believe that yelling false health information to millions doesn't deserve pushback?

I don't know what you mean by carrying his opinions at equal weight. Neil Young and the others seek to prevent him from speaking on Spotify at all. Nor is he "yelling fire in a crowded theater." He is stating an opinion that you don't agree with. The best remedy for bad ideas is better ideas, not censorship. You might want to protect his right to speak or else someday they might come for you to make you shut up. Speech that most people consider repugnant should be the most zealously protected speech, since dictatorship will often begin by silencing it before they move on to silencing all critics.
Lash
 
  0  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 12:04 pm
@Brandon9000,
I agree with the basic sentiment Brandon expresses here.
Mame
 
  1  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 12:17 pm
@Lash,
I do, too. How can someone make an informed decision without listening to or reading more than one perspective? This is what's going to be missing from some of your schools - critical thinking.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  2  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 12:36 pm
@Brandon9000,
Quote:
He is stating an opinion that you don't agree with.

Opinions are one thing – featuring guests who make factual misstatements and deliberate falsehoods while Spotify makes $$$ off the resulting controversy is something else. If media hosts want to expose the public to a wide range of beliefs, both right and wrong, on events in the news I think they owe it to their audience to distinguish which ones are based on accepted science and which ones are speculative.
Quote:
Speech that most people consider repugnant should be the most zealously protected speech, since dictatorship will often begin by silencing it before they move on to silencing all critics.

But in today's USA, dictatorship is a very unlikely scenario. A loss of social cohesion caused by the belief that we can choose our own "alternative facts" and live in a society where expertise and learning are devalued and the loudest voices dominate political discussion sets the stage for anomie.
Lash
 
  1  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 01:54 pm
@hightor,
I think where your opinion loses is ‘deliberate falsehoods.’ Fauci made several claims re Covid that we’re later proven false. Were his falsehoods deliberate? Why? How do you know when someone’s errors are deliberate?

I think a regular guy like Rogan deserves at least the same latitude science doctor information guru Dr. Fauci got.

🤔
hightor
 
  1  
Sat 5 Feb, 2022 02:41 pm
@Lash,
Quote:
Fauci made several claims re Covid that we’re later proven false.

Do you recall what those were? Did he ever prescribe hydroxychloroquine, tout injections of disinfectants, or claim that choosing not to get a vaccine and not being able to go to a movie theater is comparable to Jewish people being targeted and murdered?

Here's the difference; the scientific community has steadily revised earlier guidelines that were either based on a limited understanding of the disease or needed to be adapted to the conditions posed by new variants.
Quote:
Were his falsehoods deliberate?

If you can identify specific falsehoods I could give you an explanation as to why I think they were or were not deliberate. Basically, the CDC wants to be on the scientifically correct side of the issue, even if it means backing off earlier statements.
Quote:
How do you know when someone’s errors are deliberate?

Not being a medical biologist, I have to base my assessment on the preponderance of scientific opinion. I'll also look for political motivation as there are people who are ideologically opposed to government involvement in public health. And I just try to ask what is being gained by pushing alternative cures, who stands to make money, and what audience is being addressed.
Quote:
I think a regular guy like Rogan deserves at least the same latitude science doctor information guru Dr. Fauci got.

But I didn't think Rogan (who is hardly a "regular guy") was making the claims himself. He was providing a platform where misinformation was disseminated and not challenged. He actually has been given the same latitude as Fauci – he hasn't been muzzled and he's said that he will try to do better in the future. That's all any of us can do.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  1  
Sun 6 Feb, 2022 04:25 pm
Joe Rogan Admits He 'F--ed up' Spreading Conspiracy Theory About California, Oregon Wild Fires

Quote:
"They've arrested left-wing people for lighting these forest fires," Rogan said incorrectly on Thursday's podcast. "You know, air-quote, 'activists.' This is also something that's not widely being reported, you know, that people have actually been arrested for lighting fires up there." This narrative was promoted most notably by Fox News host Laura Ingraham, but it has now been reliably debunked by both local law enforcement and the FBI, according to a report by The Washington Post.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  -1  
Mon 7 Feb, 2022 05:05 am
"It's just a joke, bro."
Lash
 
  0  
Mon 7 Feb, 2022 08:28 am
@hightor,
Quite an intelligent article, hightor.
I’m sure we expect even-handed facts from a writer who begins by referring to Rogan as a “talking steroid syringe.”

I understood why Alex Jones was scrubbed from social media. Despite his imperfections and instances of poor judgment, I will not support driving Rogan’s voice from social media — unless he invites violence. It would set a dangerous precedent. We’re already sliding down that dangerous slope.
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/23/2024 at 03:49:50