@oralloy,
Quote:Again, that doesn't mean anything when there is no way to even detect the cheating.
Evidence of fraud
is evidence of cheating. Fraudulence is detectable because measures are put into place to assure that registration, voting, and ballot counting are conducted fairly.
Quote:The Democrats could have illegal immigrants vote over and over again, each time using the name of a different dead person.
They
could — but it would be extremely inefficient and subject to discovery. Using people who are already subject to arrest for immigration violations would be foolish. How would these people be paid? Even if paid in cash, funds would need to be converted to cash which could raise suspicion. Using foreign-born people to impersonate USAmericans would be stupid. Assuming that no suspicions would arise when some non-white person who speaks broken English tries to sign in as "Wilfred Heny Cavendish III" is dumb. Accessing registration lists and determining which names belong to people who have died would be time-consuming and subject to transcription errors or the possibility that a poll worker would recognize the name as belonging to a dead person — or recognize the impostor as someone seen fleeing ICE agents the day before.
No one denies that occasionally fraudulent ballots are cast or that people occasionally vote illegally. But to embark on a wide scale effort to employ an already-suspected demographic to engage in massive voter fraud would require an unprecedented level of organization, security, and secrecy.
Quote:Questioning the results is not cheating.
Attempting to change them after they've been fairly and properly counted, recounted, and verified most certainly
is cheating.
