Ive always used a term similar to "information"(pattern data) until I read Demskis BS papers on what you try to preach about
If you recall, I never got boisteroud till you and guys like layman began to discount evolutionary sciences and thus infer that all changes wre "DESIGNED"
with no evidence other than silly speculation that ignores most of biological, paleogeological, paleochemical , and adaptive change mechanisms (Like how you ignorantly tried to poo pooh the evolution of whals from Ambulocoetus and Pakicoetus, when there is an overwhelmiing amount of structural functionary data and anatomical data.So all you do is deny the science and begin name calling on me.
It really doesnt bother me because, Like here, I can give you guys a response in terms you will have to go far to dismiss.
You still insist the complexity of lif argument is valid to assert id.