@maxdancona,
Quote:Your response was attacking my rejection of BillRM's racism.
It really wasn't. I was questioning one element of your argument, which seemed like a rejection of the historical record.
Quote:If you don't want to be involved in the argument then why you're jumping into the middle of it.
I'm not "jumping into the middle of it", I'm trying to clarify one portion of it, based on what you said in the quoted statement.
Quote:It sure seems like you were supporting Bill's racist comments.
I wasn't. I joined the discussion subsequent to those exchanges and never made a statement supporting one side or the other. My interest was specifically in your apparent rejection of historical facts not your rejection of racism.
Personally, I wish the Europeans had never left their little enclave on the western end of the Asian land mass. I'm sorry that European invaders weren't immediately destroyed upon setting foot in the Western Hemisphere. Or anywhere else where they attempted to expropriate newly-discovered land, exploit newly- available resources, or exterminate newly-found peoples and cultures. **** the conquistador mentality. **** the missionary mentality. **** the "white man's burden" mentality.
If you want to discuss what you specifically consider to be "BillRW's racist comments" I'd consider that a different discussion, unrelated to the limited topic I'm discussing with you here. I'm thinking of historical events like the slaughter of the Armenians by the Ottomans and how present-day Turks feel
they are being attacked by the mention of this aspects of history. There seems to be a desire to whitewash events in the past rather than deal with them seriously and critically.