@vikorr,
vikorr wrote:if the topic doesn't hit one of his many filters (which warp things). Unfortunately the filters cover most topics in this forum,
vikorr wrote:It's just that the filters are warped / don't enable him to see what he doesn't want to see
In other words, I keep my focus on reality instead of disregarding it when progressives insist that reality be disregarded.
vikorr wrote:drive him to focus on detail that support his opinion to the exlcusion of all else etc.
Gosh! I focus on details that support my viewpoint?! Who would have ever thought of such a thing?
/sarcasm
Your complaint is essentially that it isn't fair that I am using intelligent debate techniques that you are not capable of using.
vikorr wrote:Most people call it deluded, and it is by the normal view of such.
No. Pointing out facts that support my position is not what "delusion" means.
vikorr wrote:Perhaps I see it differently because I've known a number of people with Aspergers etc, and I think of how they think (when their filters are activated) as miswiring. When that happens, they too often focus only on things that support their views, to the exclusion of context,
"Focus on the things that support your position" is something that all intelligent people do when they are debating.
I need to wait for you to finish editing before I reply. I think I'm quoting the final version of your post, but might have missed something.
vikorr wrote:and frequently think they are right and everyone else is wrong.
That is a trait of people who understand a topic and know that they are correct.
vikorr wrote:They too can confuse opinion with fact, because they want their opinion to be fact.
Note your inability to provide any examples of me confusing opinion for fact.
vikorr wrote:It' also why I say you can't convince him of anything he doesn't want to be convinced of.
All people need to have in order to convince me of something is a sound argument.
The fact that you don't have a good argument is your failure not mine.