Has Donald J. Trump overturned the Election result today?

Anyone can sound like you, you have a very limited vocabulary and a host of simplistic responses.

I honestly doubt it’s possible to be as stupid and uninformed as you appear to be which is why most people think you’re a sock puppet.

You’re going to respond with your usual drivel, something like,

“Wrong again I have an IQ of 170.”

You see how easy it is. It’s like that episode of Star Trek where Kirk gets sent to an alternative universe but manages to get back because, ‘it’s easier for a civilised man to act like a savage than a savage to act like a civilised man.’ In the same vein it’s easy for a reasonably intelligent person to sound like an idiot, but it’s next to impossible for an idiot to sound intelligent. Which is why nobody believes your bollocks about being smart.

Try writing something intelligent for once.

You're lying again. It's you and Max who sound stupid, not me.

I'm not the one who has to resort to childish namecalling because of an inability to say anything intelligent.

More of the usual moronic drivel.

Try reading a ******* book.

Do you know what a book is?

You can argue the toss as much as you want, but it’s Occam’s razor, you appear idiotic because you’re an idiot.

I am too smart to sound like him.

But... Godwin's Law! I win the debate.

I love when Oralloy and Izzy fight.

It is like watching an angry dog in an argument with a mirror.

That’s the best yet, it’s almost witty. Well done Max, you’re at the top of your game.

Oh dear, now you’re back to your usual form, cutting and pasting someone else.

You remind me of Joaquin Pheonix’s Joker, someone who desperately wants to be funny yet has no concept of what funny actually is.

Your characterization is as usual inaccurate. I don't suffer from an inability to say anything intelligent and have to resort to childish namecalling. You and Izzy the push do.

You are a good boy Izzy. [Max pats him behind the ears].

I read ten times as many books as you do, and most of them have more substance than anything that you are capable of reading.

You and Max are the only idiots here.

There’s that limited vocabulary again. Instead of constantly calling people childish try learning some new words. How about puerile? It derives from the Latin puer, meaning boy.

Did you know there were languages other than the 5% of English that you seem familiar with?

In your dreams.

Just be grateful I’m talking to you, it’s the best you can hope for.

I’m going to watch the animated, reconstructed DVD of Patrick Troughton’s Doctor Who adventure Fury from the Deep, so you’re going to have to talk to yourself for a while.

Of the three of us... I am the only one who knows he is an idiot.

I think that gives me an advantage.

It's just the opposite. You and izzythepush engage in childish namecalling because you are both incapable of making intelligent replies.

I on the other hand make intelligent replies.

Oralloy.... pay attention.

It was a joke. I was parroting what you wrote to say that I never sound like you.

Don't take everything to seriously. We are all idiots here, or we wouldn't be in this silly thread.

(Really... read the past two pages of this thread and tell me that the three of us aren't complete idiots.)

That's another lie. I used the appropriate words to describe you.

Well, this is all very illuminating. I could get on my high horse but given that I'm just repeating the same post over and over again, can't really claim the moral high ground.

That's two 'high' clichès in one post. Just 39 days 'til the fat lady sings.

First time I heard that song I was driving out the L. I.E. listening to Howard Stern. I was laughin my ass off and missed my turn

Two major problems would arise from eliminating "ignorant people" from voting.

One...who would devise the test for determining who is intelligent enough to vote?

Two...no matter who devises it, why would you want to eliminate all the people who vote Republican? We do need a loyal opposition!