@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:
Brandon you are being silly.
Jessy Jacabs' story was rejected in court because it was unsubstantiated. She failed to give any evidence that what she was saying was true; no names, no dates, no places no reporting ... nothing that could be confirmed.
This was heard in court and rejected as nonsense. That is why we have courts.
Brandon, step out of your little bubble and think about the arguments you are making. They don't make any sense to anyone on the outside.
A witness stating that she was told to back date ballots need not have tape recorded the conversation in order to testify. Usually, witnesses in a courtroom, stating what they saw, or heard, or were told cannot prove that their accounts are true. Witnesses are not restricted to providing only accounts that they recorded.
Since she has said that a supervisor told her to back date ballots, I'm sure that if asked, she could name the supervisor or at least state approximately when and where it occurred. Please provide a link in which someone asks her in court and she says that she doesn't know. It seems to me that if the court needed additional details beyond what the affidavit (which you haven't seen) stated, one might have asked the witness to provide them.