Reply
Mon 11 Jul, 2005 10:17 am
Philip attended the lectures and book seminars; however, his behavior during these program meetings was occasionally erratic.
--From my Faculty Evaluation of Student Achievement
"This was only the third time I'fe seen this happen at Evergreen," my academic advisor assures me as we leave together. I know not who was taken more aback by what has just happened, me or her. I have just walked away from every student's fear: A teacher who is out to get you. Despite this college's claim to be accepting and open minded, I have just borne witness to behavior straight out of Severus Snape's playbook. Trudging through the drizzle, I ask myself once again how things could go so badly awry despite good intentions.
I start my day off by waking up late. It is March 19th, 2003. History might remember this date as the start of the second Gulf War, but I will recall this as one of my gloomier days on record.
Appropriately to my mood (dreary) and my residence (Washington State), it is rainy and overcast. I can still make my appointment, but it is not the early bus to Olympia I wanted. It seems that my discipline has waned with the collegial quarter.
My bus trip taking me from my home in Shelton, formerly an old logging town located at the tip of one of Puget Sound's fish hooks, to Olympia, our nearby state capital, proceeds uneventfully. I can't drive, so public transport is my only option aside from relying on my siblings, who all have their own schedules. On the plus side (know there even was one?) I need not fret over gas money and insurance.
After almost one hour traveling and two different buses, I reach my misnamed destination: Evergreen State College. Named after the trees which dominate our region, the buildings are anything but. A coarse collection of concrete buildings, it is something of an eyesore. It also seems that the current number of eyesores is not enough, and they are putting up yet another to further add to the atmosphere without clashing with the current monstrosities. Oh goody.
To reach Evergreen's buildings, I must first traverse its spacious red square, be it consciously or unconsciously fashioned after the one history remembers. Knowing Evergreen, I am leaning towards the former.
I enter the cavernous, brooding foyer of Evergreen's main building, the library. I see there's a shrine up to the Greener (that's what people here are called) who got herself run over by an Israeli bulldozer protesting the destruction of Palestinian homes over the weekend. My family cannot help but grasp the humor.
Even so, she deserves respect for her courage, assuming, of course, that she knew the risks. I have my doubts about that, but even so
I walk over to the shrine, which comes complete with a candlelight vigil. I mumble a few words about how while I may have disagreed with what she stood for, I respect her nevertheless. I wonder if anyone present heard my words, but on the other hand, perhaps it is best none did. At any rate, I beat a hasty retreat from the scene.
I swing from the foyer into the actual library section of the library building, briefly greeting my work study supervisor, Jane. She somehow reminds me of my grandma, right down to her hearing disability. I like her, and I like working here in the library for the most part, but I also fear ghettoization, being forced to work forever with the disabled, being given jobs out of charity. I'm too smart to live out an Uncle Tom lifestyle?-or so I flatter myself.
I'm not working today, so I go over to the computer to print out my comments to my instructor with whom I'm scheduled to meet with sometime in the next hour. I've forgotten when, precisely.
You see, after every quarter, each and every student conferences for about twenty minutes with his class's instructor, getting critiqued on for his performance. The word "critique" is usually too strong for it, however. To criticize a student's "achievements" is by and large anathema to most instructors here. My quarter's class bears the politically correct title "Celluloid Women and Men," for which I am typing out my comments in advance, in anticipation of an unusually uncomfortable encounter.
I have much to regret this quarter, both personally, and how I behaved in class. I want to show my Instructor just how much remorse I genuinely feel:
My Dear Instructor,
I have not been the best of students in your class to put it mildly. I truly regret this, although I do think I improved as the quarter waned. As I came to better understand the expectations, I rose towards meeting them, but even so
I talked way too much, I never fit in, and I think it showed. At least for me, this show was about a learning curve. Please forgive me if I made you feel uncomfortable; it was not my intention.
There. It is a good speech, nice and contrite, before getting into the frictions betwixt us. I print it out, and decide to take no chances and be early. I leave the concrete Library Building monstrosity to take the few-minute-walk to the concrete Seminar Building monstrosity next door. As I do so, I pass under the mud swallows nesting against the library's mighty eaves and over the dropping-strewn ground. My instructor's office would have to be on the Seminar's top, third-story tier, too. Oh, well, good exercise. Even so, as you have no doubt noticed, I am having a hard time keeping a good attitude.
At almost 11 o'clock sharp, I walk up to my instructor's door, and ask her when specifically my appointment is. My instructor, a Japanese woman donning a typically gloomy-eyed expression on her face, is clearly annoyed, as she tells me our rendezvous is at 11:30. As I just now realize that her conference schedule is posted on her door, I now see that her irritancy is more than justified. I thank her for answering my needless question as she quickly shuts the door in my face.
I now decide to withdraw down the hall to a reading space where me and other schmos like me wait to be commented upon. As I wait, reading an interesting book written in an aggravating manner, I ponder where exactly it is that I went wrong this last quarter.
For starters, there was a clash in viewpoint. Evergreen is a bastion of radical liberalism, and as I hail from, in terms of the political spectrum, extreme conservatives
well, you know. Group "debate" after group "debate," it has been affirmation after affirmation in their socio-political thought and bias because the political demographics are, so you say, "skewed." For the most part, I've taken pains to keep my mouth shut, and stayed off the railroad.
But that was just why I did not enjoy the "debates" much. I more than look the part of a Greener, actually, which allows me to fit in seamlessly. As the proud owner of a brown-colored scalp (balding early and on top, unfortunately) and a gold-tinted beard, I more than fit in with the grungy, ungainly male facial hair which dominates the campus. Though I wear it part in honor of my father's own jet-black beard (and the other from shaving dislike), let's just say it does not fly too well at home. My unkempt beard has been a bone of contention amongst my immediate family the way long hair has been in others. My grandma, ironically from whom I inherited my beard's color, has been my beard's greatest critic. My family's most serious criticisms of all, however, stem from the stigma of facial hair. Considering my already-bizarre behavior, I cannot say that concern is totally unjustified.
That behavior I think is where I got in trouble with my instructor. One day after class, I was waiting to chat with her, and I think that my pacing unnerved her. If so, she is not the first. Wandering back and forth confusedly, complete with a disconcerting frown like a predator eyeing his prey, I daresay I cut the stereotypical image of a stalker. I once inadvertently scared a sweet 98-year-old lady into calling over her relatives, so I know my capabilities of unease. My mother and sister dislike my image too, but they, at least, have a built-up tolerance.
It is not just the look, however, given some of my comments. I once provoked a sweet, ninety-seven year-old lady into whacking me with her cane over an age-related joke. As for my sister and mother, they have hit me more times than I can count for observations deemed unsuitable. Of course, in their case, I am kind of inviting displeasure. Yes sir, I all too easily fit the Tim Allen profile, and I fear today will be one of those times I'll regret it.
I look up from my book and reexamine my watch. The half hour nears; I had best be up and doing. I put away the book that has my sister convinced the Apocalypse starts in 2006, and amble on down to the end of the hallway to await sentencing.
Five minutes or so later, out comes the girl ahead of me, and I prepare to enter. I have read and reread my crafted statement, and am poised for anything. "Anything" indeed does happen next, and still it floors me. Looking me with her Oriental face as taciturn as ever, she utters words to numb my bravery: "Stay out here. Your student advisor will get here soon." Again the door closes shut in my face, again leaving me alone with my thoughts. She fears me.
It was through my student advisor that I first found out my instructor thought I was a menace, but it wasn't like couldn't tell. Yes, I may have sub par people skills, but I have been around the block long enough to know when someone fears you. It may have (has, actually) taken some disastrous encounters of which I had rather not say, but awareness I have. It just figures that she would want a chaperon.
Even so, something else gets me. She knew that when I was coming in weeks in advance, and beyond that, had a half hour heads up that I would show, yet something was strange. She could have notified my advisor in advance, to say nothing of yet I could hear her on the phone, right then and there. Like a football coach trying to rattle an enemy place kicker by calling timeout, she was trying to unsettle me via an unnecessary wait. She's trying to freeze me.
I junk my paper, realizing the venue has changed. In it, I had confessed to my instructor my sins as her pupil, recognizing my shortcomings, but I had been anticipating one-on-one, not a trio. Carrying on, even enlarging upon, some of the points that I had made over the quarter as intended would probably be better received without the presence of a third party, so I prepare instead to paraphrase the parts still relevant.
I had prepared for a conference when it should have been for a trial. Perhaps I could plead innocent thanks to mitigating childhood hardships. What a story I could tell: I had a father who constantly failed his promises, an Old School mother who applied the rod, a brother who just never understood, a Grandma that never listened, and a sister that fed me dirt. Yes, I could probably win these faculty members over if I would spin my life as a victim, but alas, I was conditioned against doing so. Being well-raised has its downside after all.
My student advisor finally arrives at 11:38 to my relief. "She fears me," I confide to her before we enter. "I know," she confides back. The door finally opens to me, and by this time I am all too ready to get this over with.
What follows, however, gives more relevance to my last sentence than I realized. My instructor hands me my Faculty Evaluation. By the time I am finished reading, I see why she wanted a witness.
At first her assessment starts out fine, or at least "fine" by my amiable reckoning:
Philip attended most of the lectures and book seminars; however, his behavior during these program meetings was occasionally erratic.
Guilty as charged. In only my second quarter here, I had had yet to know what was expected of me. Even so, I have to say "erratic" describes me pretty fairly overall.
Then, this critique gets a little stickier:
These entries exhibited his emotional and intellectual engagement. However, some entries suggested that his comprehension of the texts was idiosyncratic.
Fair enough. At times, the stuff I had to comment on was either oblique or uninteresting, not allowing me enough to form an opinion. So what did I do? Split wood, naturally, trying to tie it to the relevant piece.
She goes on to criticize my not supporting my arguments. In the instance she gives, that was calculated. It was not supposed to be an argument, but rather a challenge. All quarter long, I had been subjected to feminist dogma, so I had responded with a counter challenge. Getting it reprinted on my official transcript, though, shows where she is going with this. She's out to embarrass me.
Finally, we come to the clincher, the topic of the quarter's end video presentation. It was my finest moment all quarter, but it also was The Straw That Broke the Camel's Back. I had actually gotten some validation when I showed my class it. They enjoyed my humor and biting commentary, amply laughing and applauding. My instructor, though, was anything but amused:
For the video production segment of the program, Philip decided to comment on 9-minute clips of Sailor Moon rather than creating a video work because he "didn't know" that he had to produce his own video work.
Now wait just a minute. I expressly asked mid-quarter if this was allowable, and as usual, we miscommunicated. Running a series of cartoon clips a total of nine minutes long while stopping and starting the VCR to provide commentary was not my first choice?-hey, not even my third, and I myself wondered if I was allowed to be so low-tech. For garnish, I made a minute- plus music video, but decided to cut it for adding nothing to the presentation.
His major goal seemed to show how "anti-feminist" this animation series was.
Ya got that right, sister.
His analysis ran the gamut of belittling the main character for letting her brother belittle her to berating her tendency to depend on her Prince Charming when she was in danger.
Again: guilty as charged.
He took the obviously comic absurdity of animation seriously.
Now it is my instructor who is being absurd. By her measure, should the portrayal of Stepin Fetchit be written off because he was absurd? For crying out loud, one Sailor Moon clip had her in a panic bawling her head off while clinging to her boyfriend who is hanging for both their lives to the side of an elevator shaft. You have to hand it to Evergreen to make me feel sane.
As soon as I had finished presenting in class and the clapping died away, my instructor started denigrating me in front of the class, insinuating against my motives and telling them my work was improperly formatted. So--she was mad at me for belittling a fictional character that she herself had called "absurd." Now she was belittling me, a real boy, for, in essence, being "absurd." Ever accusing me of having "never got it," I fear in this case she never caught the irony.
She made a telling remark claiming that this type of anime was made for boys, yet Sailor Moon is universally recognized as shojo, a girls' anime. I simply should have known there was trouble brewing the day after class where I learned she knew less about the anime aspect of Japanese culture than I did. An anime fan, I found she knew next to nil when she disbelieved after I told her that Sailor Moon was geared primarily to gals, not guys, written primarily by women for women.
Why, though, would my message be so surprising?-or upsetting? Britney Spears danced like a schoolgirl whore, yet her most devoted fans were taken-in girls. In part, my presentation was purposed to demonstrate, not state, that females could actually be more sexist on themselves than guys. All I wanted to do was to expose some irony, yet what I found was a teacher who could not grasp the concept.
Judging from the applause my audience apparently got it, but if my instructor did, she hated it. Considering all the strikes she had against me, I can see where such a message from such a messenger would be poorly received. Even so, you would expect more from a professional. The half-dozen or so classmates I talked to all liked my showing, and a couple expressly agreed that the instructor was unfair.
Even so, I liked her, in part because she came across in general more conservative than the class, which she liked little more than me. I truly wish I were a better student for her, but what's done is done. For crying out loud, I should be sorry for her. Why, you ask? Clearly, she has more problems than I do.
Back in the present, I confess to my instructor and student advisor my missteps and regrets. I also tell her that while she no doubt thinks I am one giant sexist pig, I was reared by some pretty diminutive sows, from whom I inherited the faith to hold my least popular beliefs. (Hey, if he lives in a matriarchy, he can't be all bad, can he?) Also, I have the good pleasure to announce I won't be returning to her quarter in the spring. At last she cracks a smile.
Leaving at last, I confer with my student advisor. After reading everything in the evaluation, she's still in my corner...as far can tell. At any rate, she should, because that's in her job description, and that's supposed to be what the state pays her for. She tells me that in nearly a decade working here, this is only the third time she's seen a student shafted by his faculty, but that's cold comfort. This Trial by Suspense is over, and all that's left is my evaluation of the class and instructor.
I slave for the next few hours over my evals. I take care not to fall into the trap of bad mouthing, like my instructor, but even so, her class ought to have been better managed. On the whole the class-teacher dynamic was adversarial, and that was largely her fault. Still, the class itself was fascinating. I try my best to balance this all out in my analysis, and then go back to turn it in. I should have turned it in during the conference, but I fouled that up like most everything this quarter, giving my instructor one last reason to hate me.
It's decision time: I could turn in my evals to my instructor directly, or else I could put it in her mail box, but my courage fails me. Vince Lombardi said fatigue makes cowards of us all, and so it is with me. I mercifully deposit my assessments one floor below her office without meeting her again.
And there you have my predicament with me in one lousy day with me spent at one very lousy college. I have Aspergers Syndrome, a subset of Autism, affecting all my social interactions which has only compounded the difficulty..
I am many things, but mostly many extremes and contradictions. The contradictions, most of all, are what I am proud of. They prove to me that I unlike other autistics, unlike other ideologues and Christians, I can handle ambiguity, that I can handle the clutter of real living?-or so I tell myself.
My presentation was just the latest manifestation of my effort to prove it. Here was sexism unnoticed, overlooked because it came in the form of cartoon humor. I had the grand opportunity to catch it in the act, show it for what it was, and I did.
I am in no way, shape or form a feminist, but the sexism was so outrageously blatant. In my mind's eye, this was proof of my fair-minded nature. I had finally come up with something that I and these crazy, whacked-out liberals could reach common ground.
You would have thought that this den of extreme feminists would have applauded my concise, counter-intuitive analysis, maybe even give me a medal, but instead I find mistrust and misunderstanding again.
I guess that I should not be surprised, really. My brash, arrogant, and liberal-minded history mentor saw proof of her fair-mindedness in her hatred of Oliver Stone, for instance. Truly thoughtful people oft seek points of commonality with the opposition, but the reaction shows there is little to be found. In the end, such convergences are generally only a proof fairness to the self alone, and not the group.
I never told my instructor at the start of the quarter about my "disability" because I thought I needed from no extra time, or anything like that. Just what could she give me that I would especially need? My thinking was wrong. What I actually needed was her understanding.
With business for the late quarter finished, I traipse across Red Square for the umpteenth time today, to buy the books I need next quarter. I ask the girl at the counter what the music playing in the background is from. It is from the musical Rent, she replies. I ask if she is from New York, and she gives me a look that asks me if it's a come-on. (It's not.)
It is still raining as I trudge over the Square called Red for the final time today to make my 5:15 bus. The war I have awaited for so long for is about to commence, and I feel too emotionally dreary to care, really. I feel tempted to cry, but resist.
Oh, well, I have writers group tonight, never miss that. Besides, I have another respite from the Madhouse College Evergray for about a week, and had best enjoy it while it endures. As always, I must count my blessings.
I, on the other hand was hooked immediately because I am familiar (by reputation) with Evergreen. Several people I went to college with transferred there, as it was a kind of west coast reciprocal school to mine, which was on the east coast. I also went to a school that was pretty much a haven for liberals - although I fitted in pretty well, as I was pretty much of a hippy - although I do understand the narrator's discomfort with the brand of liberalism that runs rampant at such schools - it's really more of an indoctrination than a viewpoint expressed. To me liberal means open-minded and willing to share and consider the viewpoints of others in a generous spirit - this is not often the attitude truly taken at schools such as these.
So anyway - that 's what hooked me. But I also liked the flow of the narrative, and the narrator is an interesting character. I was especially struck by his consternation and confusion upon understanding that the young woman in the office was afraid of him. It became clearer later when he states that he has Aspergers, why this might be so, as cruel and uninformed as such a reaction remains. Some people are afraid of any difference -and as Autism is a spectrum disorder and people identified with Asperger's are at the high functioning end of that spectrum, and this narrator seems to be even at the high end of the Asperger's spectrum - I would attribute the problem to the young woman and not to the narrator. Would that be accurate? His realization of this fact is a very poignant moment in the narrative for me.
This narrator is a funny and insightful story-teller. He provides interesting viewpoints and perceptions, especially around his presentation and the teacher's reaction to it - as well as his views on feminism and how it can be represented in its worst possible and most stridently unattractive form by some women.
I liked having a narrator with a difference (Asperger's). It is so rare that you read a story in the voice of someone who is living a different reality than most folks. The fact that he gets confused, but is mindful of his tendency to do just that is another really endearing aspect to his character. I'd like to read more sometime about his situation and his life as it progresses. Hope you keep writing and posting here. Thanks - Aidan