Reply
Tue 1 Sep, 2020 07:41 pm
Was it necessary for us to be in a black hole for the physics to be right? For decoherence and wave collapse to be functional? For gravity to be the right strength? For dark matter and energy to be what it is?
Doesn't the Schwarzschild Radius and the Holographic Principle hint we are in one? Could our parent black hole be different than the ones with us? Could physics be encoded in the holographic projection? Haven't we questioned how physics magically has the correct settings to allow life?
Is the acceleration of the universe from our parent black hole feeding which causes more quantum information/energy into the whole system? Would this mean our parent Universe only has one Black Hole that is constantly feeding? If physics is different there, could it be a diet of never-ending quantum waves?
Is the Big Bang and Cosmic Inflation from the initial formation of our parent black hole?
Are there layers to spacetime? Matter flows on time, space, and gravity. Is the matter layer made of quantum information? Does time dilation occur with information density? Is dark matter, information that imprinted before annihilation?
Is the formation of a Black Hole from Dark Matter forming from annihilation that occurs in a collapsing star? Is gamma-ray bursts from this annihilation? Could gamma-rays be information escaping a Black Hole?
Entanglement and the Database Structure of Reality
The program running with the Holographic Principle uses a database. It isn't a coincidence that quantum computers are amazing at database work. I discovered the structure when analyzing twin prime columns:
6n-1 | 6n | 6n+1
The root of the database ends up being { - | 0 | + }
I figured out the the left columns behaves differently than the right when it comes to the numbers that are not primes in their columns. Pseudoprimes. The left column pseudoprimes always use multiples from both columns. The right column pseudoprimes always use multiples from the same column. Two unlike signs is negative, two like signs is positive. You get pseudoprimes from active multiplication. Subatomic Energy Levels can't use numbers that are actively multiplying.
The rows of the columns are quantum information containers, it ends up being a tree.
Everything in a tree is entangled. When two atoms become entangled, you are getting two sets of prime columns inside a container. This is showing how entangled particles end up with opposite spins after decoherence.
{ [ - 0 + ] }
{ [- 0 +] 0 [- 0 +] }
It also explains why it is faster than light, both particles are in the same quantum information container.
Does the Bose–Einstein condensate explain the quantum/classical boundary?
Does uncertainty and/or entropy get internalized for matter to become physical?
Quantum information manifests as matter with wave collapse, but it needs excited internal information to remain local by itself?
Is the laser cooling in a Bose–Einstein condensate lowering entropy? Does matter have to retain heat information to remain physical/local? A Bose–Einstein condensate says yes. Is entropy excited quantum information?
Is the quantum/classical boundary determined by the object's ability to contain internal entropy?
Does decoherence summon and/or compile quantum information?
@pittsburghjoe,
This is deep I know but....Has presence always been in the black hole?...but why do we call it a black hole if presence is within it? What is presence? ...is it metaphorical light???...if presence is metaphorical light then presence completely fills the black?? hole doesn’t it. If one tries to come out of the black hole ...what does one observe??? One observes a BUBBLE...Why a bubble? Well a bubble is the only thing that is neutral with darkness and light both within it at the same time.Does space therefore consist of bubbles and is it possible to get between the bubbles?
How can it be if black holes are non existing?
@Palandre,
Define space...what is it? If you go a bit smaller.... is space itself full of bubbles?
@Jasper10,
isn't space something without properties?
@Palandre,
Well...it is an interesting question isn’t it....Still toying with that one...Presence is the issue though ...don’t forget presence or the observer....He just won’t go away....
@Jasper10,
anyway, black holes are non existing, so what is the whole point?
@Palandre,
Black holes are non existing.........?? Umm mmm
It’s the ultimate question isn’t it ...if everything collapses into a singularity and the black hole dissipates what then?
I think present understanding is that it is only what we would call matter that falls into the singularity but not space itself....Space remains.
Can space be classed as matter??
@Jasper10,
there are no blackholes and no, space is no matter.
@Palandre,
Maybe but then maybe not.....but space is in all matter if one goes small enough.I can’t agree or disagree with what you say....yet....Interesting questions though...man can’t explain consciousness either.My personal view is that presence...awareness and consciousness are different things but then that is for another time..Interesting....
@Jasper10,
conciousness is most important
@Palandre,
Consciousnesss?............ok..............If everything falls into a black hole ...just let it...you don't have to go with it.