Lash wrote:Psychotic!!!
She sent them the memo just for the hell of it. It was just a wild coincidence that they gave him the assignment the next day. She also adjourned a meeting for the purpose of handing Liar Joe off to the CIA.
What was that about?
Kuv, you're coming off like a graduate from the Tom Cruise School of Psychos. How do you know when I read Roberts' statement?
You're not in a position to judge who is stupid, unless experience is a qualifier.
sadly, yes, i am qualified to judge who is stupid here, i see it in every post you submit. you wear it on your breast like a padge of honor. serious-minded people would be ashamed to post the drivel you post after being presented the facts repeatedly, but not you.
but facts are those terrible little things that get in the way of your insane world of make-believe.
did you read what the roberts addendum/additional view of the SSCI listed as support for their allegation; plame's hand written memo?
did you read what the CIA stated about this?
i will hold your little hand one more time, gash
http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/13jul20041400/www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/creports/pdf/s108-301/roberts.pdf
page 442
Quote:On February 12, 2002, the former ambassador'swife sent a memorandum to a Deputy Chief of a division in the CIA'SDirectorate of Operations which said,"[mJyhusband has good relations with both the PM [prime minister] and the former Minister of Mines (not to mention lots of French contacts), both of whom could possibly shed light on this sort of activity.''
[/b]
that is the totality of the evidence roberts, et al. cite. there is nothing else cited from Plame by Roberts.
Contrast this with the fact that the SSCI staffer who interviewed the CIA did not actually speak to the people who made the decision to send Wilson to Niger. this is documented by several sources in differnt places.
http://foi.missouri.edu/voicesdissent/columnistnames.html
reported that:
Quote:"A senior intelligence officer confirmed that Plame was a Directorate of Operations undercover officer who worked 'alongside' the operations officers who asked her husband to travel to Niger. But he said she did not recommend her husband to undertake the Niger assignment. 'They [the officers who did ask Wilson to check the uranium story] were aware of who she was married to, which is not surprising,' he said. 'There are people elsewhere in government who are trying to make her look like she was the one who was cooking this up, for some reason,' he said. 'I can't figure out what it could be.' 'We paid his [Wilson's] airfare. But to go to Niger is not exactly a benefit. Most people you'd have to pay big bucks to go there,' the senior intelligence official said. Wilson said he was reimbursed only for expenses."
It is unfortunate that the report failed to include the CIA's position on this matter. If the staff had done so it would undoubtedly have been given the same evidence.
In fact, on July 13 of 2004, David Ensor, the CNN correspondent, did call the CIA for a statement of its position and reported that a senior CIA official confirmed the account that Plame did not propose Wilson for the trip:
Quote:"'She did not propose me,' he [Wilson] said -- others at the CIA did so. A senior CIA official said that is his understanding too."
The CIA states unequivocally that a memo written by a State Dept official who said Plame had suggested that Wilson travel to Niger contains not just incorrect but fraudulent information.
and that it is a matter of public record that they felt so:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?
pagename=article&contentId=A30842-2003Dec25¬Found=true
Quote:"But sources said the CIA believes that people in the administration continue to release classified information to damage the figures at the center of the controversy, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV and his wife, Valerie Plame, who was exposed as a CIA officer by unidentified senior administration officials for a July 14 column by Robert D. Novak.
Wilson, a prominent critic of the administration over Iraq, has said that was done to retaliate against him for continuing to publicize his conclusion, after a 2002 mission for the CIA, that there was little evidence Iraq had sought uranium in Africa to develop nuclear weapons.
Sources said the CIA is angry about the circulation of a still-classified document to conservative news outlets suggesting Plame had a role in arranging her husband's trip to Africa for the CIA. The document, written by a State Department official who works for its Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), describes a meeting at the CIA where the Niger trip by Wilson was discussed, said a senior administration official who has seen it.
CIA officials have challenged the accuracy of the INR document, the official said, because the agency officer identified as talking about Plame's alleged role in arranging Wilson's trip could not have attended the meeting.
So in the manner of the dielectic, show where in the remark of Plame's she talks in any way about sending Wilson to Niger. State in her remark the verb of action towards sending Wilson to Niger.
Do you find any such verb?
State where the CIA officials
who actually made the decision to send wilson to Niger agree with the allegations made by roberts et. al.
Show the facts, not roberts partisan smear attempt nor your own hysterical assumptions that lead you to state unequivocally to your thesis that Plame said to her superiors, "Send Wilson to Niger."
Through thesis, to antithesis, to sythesis, show how you are right and I am wrong.
and if you can't, why don't you just shut up about this and leave the adults alone?