1
   

Judges back soldier who disobeyed over Iraq

 
 
Reply Wed 22 Jun, 2005 02:28 pm
Quote:
Judges back soldier who disobeyed over Iraq

22 June 2005

LEIPZIG - A German army officer who disobeyed orders in 2003 out of opposition to the U.S. invasion of Iraq won full backing and reinstatement from a federal tribunal on Wednesday.

The major, who worked in programming at defence headquarters in Bonn, had been demoted to captain after he refused to write military logistics software, saying he feared it would be used to assist the U.S. military buildup.

Judges of the Federal Administrative Tribunal in Leipzig said that under the constitution, the man's freedom of conscience took precedent over orders. The Army should have accepted this and moved the major to other duties.

According to the court, the soldier maintained that the U.S. invasion was a breach of international law and that all German assistance for it was illegal, including allowing overflights and putting German personnel in Kuwait or on AWACS monitoring planes.

His superior could not rule out that U.S. logistics operations would benefit from the computer software, so he viewed the work on a new version in April 2003 as indirect participation in the Iraq War.

DPA
Source
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 484 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 22 Jun, 2005 02:43 pm
And DW-World (Deutsche Welle) reports:

Quote:
Court Backs Soldier's Anti-Iraq War Stance

A German court ruled Wednesday that a soldier, who refused to follow orders because he did not want to support the US-led war in Iraq, had every right to do so.

Judges at Germany's Federal Administrative Court said that members of the military could not be forced to comply with orders that go against their conscience.

The court added that the constitutionally guaranteed freedom of conscience also applied to soldiers in active service.

"The court found that the fundamental right to freedom of conscience ... cannot be superseded by an order," it said in a statement summarizing the ruling. "This order was thus invalid for the soldier. The soldier gave a credible account of the seriousness of his moral decision."

The case in question began in April 2003, when the 48-year-old soldier, who was not named, refused to continue working on the development of a software program after his superiors were unable to guarantee that it would not be used to support the US-led war in Iraq.

The soldier argued that he could not finish the work as he considered the war to be unconstitutional and a violation of international law. He also said that by working on updates for existing military software he would be aiding the German participation in the war effort.

This included the fact that German troops were stationed in Kuwait as part of the US-led "war on terror," guarded US bases in Germany to free up US troops for Iraq, participated in NATO reconnaissance flights over Turkey and allowed US military planes operating in Iraq to have German fly-over rights.


German law protects objectors

As a result, a military court demoted the man from the rank of major to captain in February 2004. The soldier appealed the decision, as did the lawyer for the military, where officials wanted the man's complete removal from the service.

But the appellate court judges now said members of the military have to adhere to German laws and cannot set aside basic rights guaranteed to everyone. They reinstated his rank of major, noting that his right to reject an order applied even if he had not filed a formal conscientious objector application.

German law offers strong protections for soldiers who refuse to follow orders on ethical grounds, rooted in the abuses of the Nazi past.

The German government strongly opposed the Iraq war and has steadfastly refused to send troops to the country.

DW staff / AFP (win)
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Judges back soldier who disobeyed over Iraq
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 10/03/2024 at 11:24:49