0
   

Gothic 𐍃𐌰 “sa”, 𐌸𐌰𐌿 “þau”

Forums: Gothic
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
NickTheodorov
 
Reply Fri 4 Oct, 2019 06:13 am
Did Gothic 𐌸𐌰𐌿 "þau" go to "if ... then" clause from a nominative singular masculine form of a Gothic demonstrative pronoun?
Was Gothic 𐌸𐌰𐌿 "þau" replaced by 𐍃𐌰 "sa"?
Is Gothic 𐌸𐌰𐌿 "þau" of "if ... then" clause an early nominative singular masculine form of a Gothic demonstrative pronoun, that survived only in that clause?

https://i.stack.imgur.com/zIJ1V.png
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 458 • Replies: 0
No top replies

 
 

Related Topics

Gothic vs Russian - Question by NickTheodorov
Is current Gothic normalised transliteration correct or not? - Question by NickTheodorov
Are Gothic digraph "ai" and Old High German "e" cognate only before /h/, /hʷ/, /r/? - Question by NickTheodorov
Are Gothic "lþ", "lf" ("rþ", "rf") exceptions from the Verner's law? - Question by NickTheodorov
Is Gothic us- / ur- sound change a Rhotacism? - Question by NickTheodorov
Are Gothic 𐌹𐌶𐌴 (izē) and Proto-Slavic *jixъ cognate? - Question by NickTheodorov
Is Gothic "im" equal to Proto-Slavic "ę" only before consonants? - Question by NickTheodorov
Why are Gothic þliuhan and English flee cognate? - Question by NickTheodorov
Gothic "taihun" ten "tigus" -ty - Question by NickTheodorov
Why Gothic verb fraisan "to tempt" don't have "t" in a stem - Question by NickTheodorov
Why Gothic nouns waldufni “authority” and wundufni "wound" have “f” in a stem - Question by NickTheodorov
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Gothic 𐍃𐌰 “sa”, 𐌸𐌰𐌿 “þau”
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 06/12/2025 at 08:59:39
▲ ▼