You really are poorly educated/indoctrinated. You are far right like The Nazis and the KKK. And you have no concept of what Socialism is.
Nazis and KKK believe in the use of aggressive violence to push people into subjugation despite their better judgment. They don't just believe in using such force in times of emergency but for the sake of achieving regular order in everyday life. When you value liberty and democracy, you don't order/coerce people around just because it is convenient. You prioritize communication and try to implore people, reason with them, etc. not manipulate and bully them into compliance and conformity.
Socialism gave us the NHS which means that poor children are given the treatment they need instead of letting them die from neglect like you do in America.
Parents are responsible for their children. They are not the collective responsibility of the state. There are many problems in the US, but a lack of socialism is not one of them. Socialism becomes necessary when you finally give up on liberty, but the mere fact that you resort to socialism in lieu of achieving a liberty/democracy-based society is failure in itself.
How does allowing children to die unnecessarily honour liberty and democracy? At the same time you can explain what is so democratic about allowing big business to add 250+ carcinogenic food additives to your children's diet, not to mention bleach.
Liberty is the principle that people can be responsible enough to self-govern. When parents fail to properly care for children, or when people knowingly poison food; they have failed to steward their freedom responsibly. Even if stronger central control (socialism) is implemented in some ways (which it also in in the US), it is not an ideal form of government but rather a temporary stop-gap measure that should transition to people governing themselves by their own liberty as soon as they can be trusted again to do so.
If you keep people in a permanent nanny-state, their capacity for independent judgment/action and responsible self-governance will continue to atrophy as all their development will be oriented toward successfully interacting with governing authorities.
Socialism lifts people out of poverty and squallor, it gives them dignity, decent housing, healthcare and a good education. That's why Jesus, and all true Christians, are Socialist.
Anything that can be achieved with socialism (social control) can be achieved by individuals acting independently under guidance of their own personal liberty. The challenge is to figure out who is exploiting freedom and getting them to stop.
Just as freedom can be abused, so can social control. In fact, the abuses that happen within a free society are generally due to people taking advantage of freedom as an opportunity to exercise power/control in an abusive way. That is why governmental control is a power/control response to others abusing power. In short, people can provoke government into exercising greater control/power by shirking the responsibility to self-govern properly, but that is an escalation of dysfunction, not an improvement.
Why can't you see that individuals taking responsibility to use their freedom responsibly at the most fundamental level is a more effective/efficient form of government than trying to control people externally?