3
   

Outrage over Japan's plan to slaughter humpback whales

 
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Dec, 2007 06:25 pm
A bit of research which doesn't involve killing the subjects of the study.:

Gathering true whale numbers
Jo Chandler
December 15, 2007
The AGE


AS JAPANESE whalers begin their annual Antarctic hunt, Australian scientists are on their way to the southern ice to launch a pioneering project to count minke whales from the air.

The project will enable the first authoritative insight into the number of whales surviving in the pack ice and will be central to continuing international debate about whaling and management of the Southern Ocean fisheries.

"Team Minke" - from the new Australian Centre for Applied Marine Mammal Science - will spend the next few weeks in low-flying aircraft crisscrossing 150,000 square kilometres of pack ice off east Antarctica.

The observations collected by 10 expert surveyors will be backed up with photographs, video footage and infra-red imagery to provide the first comprehensive picture of the whale population living in the ice.

The data will then be crunched through mathematical models being developed with the CSIRO to provide an estimate of the minke whale population living near the coast.

The team will be the first scientific expedition to fly to Casey research station aboard the Australian Antarctic Division's new Airbus A319, and are expected to land on the new Wilkins runway next week.

In the past, whale counts in the Antarctic have been constrained to observations from ships, limiting estimates to those populations in more open water. "Ships can't survey through the ice . . . on a big icebreaker, it's a bit like trying to count birds in the jungle by driving a bulldozer through - they scatter," said the expedition leader, the Australian Antarctic Division's Dr Nick Gales.

"We know whales like minkes do go into the ice, but we don't know if that is a tiny per cent of the population, or a lot."

Within the International Whaling Commission scientific committee, where Dr Gales is a delegate, "this has been a huge question for some time".


Now, using small aircraft introduced to Antarctica in recent summers to shuttle between Australia's research stations, "we can gain estimates of the density and numbers of whales within the pack ice, and within the different types of pack ice".

"Run in collaboration with other work we do - using genetics, and acoustics work, retrieving recorders put under the pack ice collecting whale sounds for a year at a time - we start to get a really good idea of the status, ecology and biology of those populations."

The data will also reveal the kind of pack ice - dense or sparse - the whales prefer.

"Under various climate change scenarios, one of the big changes that might be happening in Antarctica is in the nature and extent of pack ice, and what we are not able to say at the moment is how those changes might affect really important predators like whales and seals," Dr Gales said.

The last official numbers on Antarctic minkes are almost 20 years old, and put the population at 860,000 - but with a margin of error in the hundreds of thousands.

Scientists are now updating that figure and, while there is no agreement on the number, Dr Gales said it was likely to decline - perhaps by as much as half.
...<cont>

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/gathering-true-whale-numbers/2007/12/14/1197568263356.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
0 Replies
 
Stradee
 
  1  
Reply Fri 14 Dec, 2007 07:43 pm
mzolga, excellent articles!

Business as usual. Curry??? Can't wait reading the medicinal purposes of that concoction. Evil or Very Mad

I'm betting though, the Japanese people who don't eat whale meat, won't be starting any time soon - especially since their government continues to be untruthful about the reasons for the hunts. Stockpiling tons of whale meat isn't faring well either with nationalists.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Dec, 2007 02:47 am
PM maintains whaling stance
Posted 3 hours 32 minutes ago
ABC news online


The Federal Government is continuing to insist it is prepared to send Australian ships or planes to monitor Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean.

Federal Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson says the plans might unnecessarily raise diplomatic tensions with Japan.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd says the Government is getting more information about how it could monitor the Japanese whalers.

Mr Rudd says nobody believes the whaling is for scientific purposes, but he will not reveal if he would use the Navy and Air Force or civilians to do the checks.

"We haven't ruled out the use of Australian assets for the purposes of collecting photographic evidence in support of a possible future international legal case against the Japanese on whaling," he said.

Mr Rudd says the Opposition failed to deal with the problem when it was in office.

"I think I have a clear idea as to what the previous Australian Government did which was nothing when it came to the proper action to protect whales," he said.

"I understand the full complexity and difficulty of this challenge.

"I'm fully aware of the depth and strength of our bilateral diplomatic relationship with Japan.

"I'm equally aware of the fact that no one seriously believes this is whaling for scientific purposes."


http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/12/17/2120950.htm
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 17 Dec, 2007 07:52 pm
Gunship to shadow Japanese whalers
December 18, 2007 - 9:48AM/the AGE

A customs vessel armed with machine guns may be deployed to the Southern Ocean as part of a beefed-up plan by the Federal Government monitoring of the Japanese whale hunt.

Customs says the Oceanic Viking is not a cruise ship, as reported today, but a "full-time contracted vessel".

"The 105-metre Oceanic Viking is fitted with two deck-mounted 0.50 calibre machine guns, has a fully-equipped medical centre staffed by an Australian Antarctic Division doctor, and carries a full civilian crew and steaming party," the customs website says.

Oceanic Viking is also used to patrol Australia's northern waters.


High-level talks have centred around leasing the Oceanic Viking, a commercial vessel with a hull reinforced for ice, a crew trained for polar conditions and surveillance equipment, the Sydney Morning Herald reports today, citing anonymous sources.

Greenpeace has welcomed the reported plan to use the ship to monitor the hunt.

"We're certainly supporting the Australian Government's action that they're taking in sending a ship down," Greenpeace's Karli Thomas told the Nine Network.

"The more scrutiny that we can have on the Japanese whaling operation the better."

Ms Thomas said Greenpeace's main aim was to disprove Japanese assertions that the hunt is part of scientific research. "It's commercial hunting," she said.

While welcoming the reported plan, Ms Thomas said it was not enough.

"This year in particular the Japanese Government is starting to feel the heat," she said.

"There's been a very high level of international condemnation of the hunt and they're only just reaching the Southern Ocean now."


AAP

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/gunship-to-track-whalers/2007/12/18/1197740220130.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 02:00 am
From Crikey.com:

At the Bali climate change summit the Rudd government demonstrated that it is streets ahead of the previous government on the global environmental challenge of our time. This week presents another opportunity for leadership in environmental diplomacy, this time on the vexed issue of Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean near Antarctica.

The government is moving swiftly to begin surveillance of the Japanese whaling fleet, which has been dispatched to kill an unprecedented number of whales this summer. Projected catches for Japan's "scientific" whaling program are 850 minke whales and, for the first time, 50 fin whales (which are an endangered species) and 50 humpback whales (which are vulnerable).

This is a dramatic escalation of the Japanese whaling program, which is now reaching an intensity not seen since the days of full blown commercial whaling. Although justified by the Japanese as scientific research under a loophole provision of the Whaling Convention, in reality it is commercial whaling conducted against the express advice of the Scientific Committee of the International Whaling Commission. Consider here not only the scale of the program (Japan will kill in one summer more whales for research than it did between 1954 and 1986) but also the lethal "research" methods (despite the existence of proven non-lethal alternatives).

The government's surveillance efforts will collate evidence that could be used in a international case against Japan. Apparently we will soon learn what Australia's litigation strategy will be. In this respect it is very welcome news that Prime Minister Rudd and Environment Minister Garrett have dusted off the report of the Sydney Panel of Independent International Legal Experts, which had been hidden in a bottom draw by the former government.

The Sydney Panel Report outlines a suite of legal options for successfully challenging Japan's whaling program. These include taking a case to the International Court of Justice in The Hague for breaching the Whaling Convention, which allows genuine scientific research but prohibits plainly commercial whaling. Both Australia and Japan have accepted the jurisdiction of the World Court, so there is no impediment to bringing a case immediately.

Japan could also be hauled before the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea in Hamburg for breaches of the Law of the Sea Convention. One of the advantages of this option is that the Tribunal can issue immediate provisional measures requiring Japan to cease is unlawful whaling activities. Other equally strong options include initiating compliance procedures under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species which could lead to a collective trade embargo.

There are many good legal options available to the Rudd government to move things forward on this issue. Although international litigation ought to be a last resort, Japan has simply not responded in good faith to any diplomatic overtures made over many years. On fisheries and whaling matters it continues to make ambit claims for ever increasing catches, against scientific advice and the wishes of the international community. Although international litigation is unlikely to bring a quick fix, and does carry risks, it can lead to positive change as was seen most clearly in the case of French nuclear testing in the South Pacific.

author: Dr Tim Stephens was Rapporteur for the Sydney Panel of Independent International Legal Experts and co-author of the Sydney
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 02:37 am


I sense real movement in Oz! Surprised

Not perfect, by any means, but something very close to unity on goals, if not 100% agreement on the means!

Anyway, a huge improvement on last summer!


Opposition cautiously backs anti-whaling measures
Posted 24 minutes ago/ABC news online

http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200712/r212824_819874.jpg
Customs ship Oceanic Viking will shadow the Japanese fleet. (Getty Images: Australian Customs Service)

The Federal Opposition says the Government's new anti-whaling measures are responsible.

Australia will send a customs boat, Oceanic Viking, to the Southern Ocean to monitor the Japanese whaling fleet and put in place a range of diplomatic measures to step up pressure on Japan.

Federal Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson says he hopes Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has discussed the issue with his Japanese counterpart.

"Japan has been a key ally of Australia and a democracy since the end of World War II," he said.

"It is a very important relationship we have with Japan.

"Notwithstanding the fact that all of us in this country are quite appalled by continuing whaling activity that has been led by Japan."

The new measures have received a mixed reaction from environmentalists.

The Greens say the Federal Government's efforts fall short and are likely to fail.

Steve Shallhorn from Greenpeace has welcomed the Government's commitments but says they will still be confronting the Japanese fleet.

"Greenpeace will go down to the Southern Ocean and we will protect individual whales," he said.

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett says Japan can no longer claim that the killing of minke, humpback and fin whales is for scientific research.


"There are non-lethal ways of continuing and developing your research into whales," he said.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/12/19/2123346.htm
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 07:32 pm
Things are happening very fast, it seems.
Interesting that a bit of pressure on this issue from the US means the Japanese finally start paying attention! Ah, "diplomacy! :wink:
Whale articles are all over our newspapers & media today!
See other related stories which can be accessed from the ABC link below.:


Japan denies agreement on humpback whale kill
By North Asia correspondent Shane McLeod

Posted 3 hours 16 minutes ago
Updated 2 hours 28 minutes ago/ABC news online


A spokesman for Japan's Foreign Ministry says there is no formal agreement yet on abandoning his country's plans to kill up to 50 humpback whales in the Southern Ocean this summer.

Last night, the US Ambassador to Tokyo revealed that Japan may agree to abandon the humpback kill because of international concerns.

The ABC has been told that an agreement could be finalised later this week.

Tomohiko Taniguchi from Japan's Foreign Ministry says he is not aware of an agreement at this stage.

"I don't think there has been any written sort of agreement with regard to Japan's whaling activities, let alone about Japan's hunting of humpback whales," he said.

Mr Taniguchi says Australia's plan to monitor Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean will not be a problem, as long as there is no interference with Japanese ships.


End whaling

However, federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett says it is not good enough for Japan to cancel its plans to kill 50 humpback whales.

Mr Garrett and Foreign Affairs Minister Stephen Smith have announced a range of measures to pressure Japan to stop whaling, including sending a Customs ship to the Southern Ocean to monitor the cull.


Mr Garrett has told Channel Nine he hopes Japan has abandoned plans to kill humpbacks, but he wants an end to all whaling.

"It'd be a welcome development but it's not enough," he said.

"We've got fin whales that are endangered - some 50 of them that are being targeted, 900 minkes, we've got a whole lot of whales that will be slaughtered this season.

"But if that's what's happening then it's a sign I think that sort of pressure we're seeing here in Australia - the fantastic campaigns that have been underway - are perhaps being heard."

Meanwhile, Queensland's whale watching industry welcomed indications Japan might back down on its plans to kill humpback whales.

Hervey Bay tour operator Brian Perry says he hopes the Australian Government's decision to send a Customs boat to monitor any cull will prompt an end to all whaling.

"Finally the Australian Government has taken notice of the opinion of the Australian people," he said.

"We're getting that much support from protest and petitions so the Government's had to take notice and the more they do, the better.

"Hopefully they will bring an end to the whaling."

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/12/20/2123605.htm
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 07:49 pm
YOWZUH, NEWS IS ENCOURAGING .
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 07:59 pm
Yes, isn't it, farmer?! Very Happy

Apparently (just heard on the radio news) a delegation of representatives from 30 nations will meet with representatives of the Japanese government about whaling tomorrow.

The problem (as I see it, anyway) is that I suspect that the Japanese will use the humpbacks as a sort of "ambit" claim. They may say that they'll refrain from killing humpbacks in exchange for killing other whales (like minkes & others) in the Southern Ocean. I doubt this will go down at all well in Oz, anyway .....
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 08:18 pm
Front page of my morning paper today.:

Japan put on notice over whale hunt
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2007/12/19/rgn_whaling_wideweb__470x346,0.jpg
Japanese crews were confronted by protesters last year as they hunted whales.
Photo: Reuters


Brendan Nicholson and Andrew Darby
December 20, 2007


THE Rudd Government is set to dramatically escalate Australia's efforts to stop Japanese whalers, sending a ship and an aircraft to gather evidence against them in the Southern Ocean, and organising a coalition of nations to campaign against the practice.Mr Smith announced the unprecedented intervention after the Japanese fleet had already reached Antarctic waters for its "scientific" kill, with a quota of 935 minke whales and, more controversially, 50 humpbacks and 50 fin whales, regarded respectively as threatened and endangered species.

Hours after Australia's move, there were suggestions in Tokyo that the Japanese may not go ahead with the humpback kill. The US ambassador to Japan, Thomas Schieffer, said he believed agreement had been reached with Tokyo to spare the humpbacks, which are popular with whale watchers for their distinctive shape and acrobatics. There was no word from Japan on Mr Schieffer's suggestion.

Last night, in its first official response, the Japanese Government called for calm and expressed hope Australia would come to understand its whaling.

"Japan's research whaling is done in accordance with the rules set by the International Whaling Commission," said Japan's Chief Cabinet Secretary, Nobutaka Machimura. "We will continue to explain to Australia through diplomatic channels the necessity of research whaling.

"We must approach this issue calmly with the spirit of maintaining friendly ties between Japan and Australia."

Australia's plan was revealed as it emerged that the non-government protesters were battling serious mechanical failures.

The Sea Shepherd Conservation Society's ship, the Steve Irwin, halted its search after blowing a piston. Captain Paul Watson said he hoped to reach Hobart for repairs by Sunday and sail again within 48 hours.


The departure from Auckland of Greenpeace's Esperanza was delayed as it waited for helicopter parts. Expedition leader Sara Holden said it eventually had to sail without the aircraft.

Mr Smith urged the crews of the protest boats, as well as the whalers, to show restraint. "If there is an adverse incident on those seas, the capacity for rescue is very low and the capacity for adverse injury or fatalities is very high," Mr Smith said.

Mr Garrett said the claim by the Japanese of "scientific whaling" was a sham. "Slaughtering whales is not scientific. It's cruel, it's barbaric, and it's unnecessary," he said. "There are non-lethal ways of continuing and developing your research into whales. Fifteen minutes of agonising death at the hands of a harpoon, is no way to treat these beautiful and regal creatures."

A spokesman for Japan's Cetacean Research Institute denied the hunt was cruel, saying the methods used were the most efficient available. "Japan, Norway and Iceland are all continuing to improve it," he said.

Despite a ban on commercial whaling, Japan conducts its hunt using a loophole in International Whaling Commission rules that allow lethal "research". Japanese scientists claim reviving fin and humpback stocks may be adversely affecting minke stocks. But to find out more, they doubled the minke quota from 440.

Mr Smith said the Government would issue a diplomatic protest note over the next few days. Australian would also gather a group of nations for a formal protest and would appoint an envoy to seek to persuade the Japanese Government to abandon whaling.

In addition, the Government was considering pursuing international legal action, and Attorney-General Robert McClelland had commissioned advice on how this could be done. Mr Smith said all legal options were "on the table", including action before the International Court of Justice, or the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.

He was not expecting a diplomatic backlash because, first, the Japanese Government was aware of the strength of feeling in Australia and, second, the relationship between the countries was "strong enough and big enough for us to agree to disagree about this matter".

The Government was backed by New Zealand and by Opposition Leader Brendan Nelson, who said deploying a ship and aircraft was "sensible".

Greenpeace also backed the Government's move, but Sea Shepherd's Captain Watson said the Government should do more, including sending armed ships, as it did to intercept illegal fishing by Uruguayan ships.

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2007/12/19/1197740380464.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 08:20 pm
I heard on the radio this am reports that Japan is planning to halt the killing of humpbacks this year.


Crossed fingers.



Go Kevin!!!!
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 08:23 pm
dlowan wrote:
I heard on the radio this am reports that Japan is planning to halt the killing of humpbacks this year.


Crossed fingers.



Go Kevin!!!!


Ah, the reports seem to change all the time, Deb.

I suspect they'll use the humpbacks as a bargaining tool ... like, we won't kill them if you'll allow as to kill the rest. Not good enough!
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 08:33 pm
Taking the fight right to Tokyo
Andrew Darby
December 20, 2007/THE AGE


ANALYSIS

THE RUDD Government's decision to take the fight to Japan is the most significant advance by Australia against whaling since the Fraser government outlawed it nearly 30 years ago.

Australia and other anti-whaling nations have long tried to protect the great mammals. First, they won a moratorium on commercial whaling at the International Whaling Commission. Then they secured big whale sanctuaries, including around the Southern Ocean.

But Japan's relentless pursuit of a return to full-scale commercial whaling meant that, at best, anti-whaling nations were only able to stem the tide as the Asian power used IWC loopholes to advance.

The previous government's failure to stop Japan was even admitted by former prime minister John Howard who, relying on diplomacy, agreed earlier this year that it hadn't worked.

In fact, its abject failure was clear for all to see in the Japanese whalers' decision to expand their Antarctic kill, adding to it humpbacks that migrate along our own coast. Almost three years of loud protests by Australians against this particular kill yielded no change from Japan.

Now the new Government has laid out its own path towards ending what Environment Minister Peter Garrett calls the "senseless and brutal practice" of whaling.

In the immediate future, the whalers will get an unwelcome official international spotlight on their work. Medium term, the strength of international courts could be tested for the first time on the whales' behalf. In the longer term, Australia is taking the argument into the only place where it can be finally won: Japan itself.

Precedents for sending a ship to monitor the Japanese fleet are strong.

An Australian Antarctic resupply helicopter took the first aerial shots of the Nisshin Maru's factory deck, awash with whale blood, off Davis Station in 1992. An RNZAF Orion searched for, and found, the whalers in the Ross Sea last January. The New Zealand Government made public its anger.

The use of Oceanic Viking and a crew trained in interdicting foreign vessels offers a chance that the whalers will be embarrassed on a daily basis.Surveillance by the Australian Antarctic Division's long-range aircraft adds to the likelihood this will work.

The diplomatic route through Tokyo is where long-term hopes lie. Another joint protest against whaling is just that. There have been many without any sign of success. Last year, one was led by a Brazilian ambassador who said later: "We were met with a sneer."

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/taking-the-fight-right-to-tokyo/2007/12/19/1197740380540.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 19 Dec, 2007 09:27 pm
... & about bloody time, too!

Please, please delegation members, do not do any deals involving "acceptable levels" of "scientific" culls with the Japanese.

Australia has responsibility for the whales in the Southern Ocean. Let's take that responsibility seriously, for a change!
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 05:34 am
Yes they will ... no they won't .... yes they will ..... Rolling Eyes
Sigh:


Humpbacks still in Japan's sights
December 20, 2007 - 2:49PM/the AGE


Japan's government today said it would press ahead with plans to kill humpback whales.

It denied comments from the US ambassador, who said the two countries had agreed on a temporary deal not to harvest humpbacks.

"There is no (new) written, diplomatic agreement between Japan and the United States over the current specific whaling mission ... and whaling in general," said Tomohiko Taniguchi, spokesman for the Japanese foreign ministry.

He was responding to comments by US ambassador Thomas Schieffer, who reportedly told journalists yesterday that Japan and the United States agreed on no harvesting of humpback whales for the time being.

Taniguchi said the ambassador might have meant to refer to various discussions between Japan and the US and suggested whaling had been one of many topics covered.

He added, however, that he was not aware of the context in which Schieffer made the remarks.

"I cannot disclose exactly what diplomatic discussions we are having. But there is no concrete, diplomatic agreement on whaling between Japan and the United States," Taniguchi said. ... <cont>

http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/humpbacks-still-in-japans-sights/2007/12/20/1197740445419.html
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 08:32 am
Whale may be tastier than I thought.


http://www6.comcast.net/news/articles/science/2007/12/19/Whale.Ancestor/?cvqh=science_whales
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 05:31 pm
Interesting article cjhsa. Thanks for posting it.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 05:36 pm
Update on the planned protest to the Japanese government:

Australian ambassador to lodge formal whaling protest
Posted 2 hours 32 minutes ago/ABC NEWS online

Australia's ambassador to Japan will today lodge a formal diplomatic protest with Japan's Foreign Ministry over the country's ongoing whaling programs.

Australia's ambassador to Japan will be among a group of representatives from anti-whaling nations expected to take their high level protest to Japan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

It will be Australia's third formal approach to Japan's diplomats in the past month, and will focus on concern that Japan is going to press ahead with plans to hunt up to 50 humpback whales, along with more than 900 other whales this season. .... <cont>

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/12/21/2124671.htm
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 05:47 pm
Sparing humpbacks won't stop whale campaign
http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2007/12/21/PMN_shpeherd_wideweb__470x292,0.jpg
The Sea Shepherd vessel Steve Irwin patrolling in the Southern Ocean.
Photo: Image Supplied


Brendan Nicholson and Andrew Darby
December 21, 2007/the AGE


AUSTRALIA will continue its tough new campaign to stop Japanese whaling in the Southern Ocean even if Japan abandons its plan to kill 50 humpback whales, Foreign Minister Stephen Smith says.

Mr Smith announced on Wednesday that the Government would dramatically increase Australia's efforts to stop Japanese whalers, sending a ship and an aircraft to gather evidence against them in the Southern Ocean, and organising a coalition of nations to campaign against the practice.

There was confusion yesterday about Japanese intentions after the US ambassador to Tokyo, Thomas Schieffer, said on Wednesday that he believed Washington had reached an agreement with Tokyo to spare the humpbacks while continuing with its plan to slaughter 50 endangered fin whales, and up to 935 minke whales. The humpbacks migrate along the Australian coast in winter.

The US has been lobbying Japan on Australia's behalf.

Yesterday, Japanese Foreign Ministry spokesman Tomohiko Taniguchi rejected the ambassador's claim.

"There is no (new) written, diplomatic agreement between Japan and the United States over the current specific whaling mission … and whaling in general," Mr Taniguchi said.

Mr Smith said last night he would welcome a Japanese decision to spare the humpbacks but that would not change anything.

The inclusion of humpbacks in the cull was one of the concerns he raised with the Japanese delegation at recent security talks in Canberra.

He said he would be very happy if the Americans had persuaded Japan to desist. "But no one must think that if they come to a decision that they are not going to take 50 humpbacks that that in any way changes the fundamental position."

Mr Smith said he was confident Australia's relationship with Japan would survive the whaling row despite strong views on both sides.

Greenpeace Australia's chief executive Steve Shallhorn said his organisation did not accept that there had been a change of heart in Japan and the first humpbacks might have been harpooned already.

"The whaling fleet would normally be well into its operations by now," he said.


And while it welcomed Australian Government plans to monitor the fleet, the International Fund for Animal Welfare said Australia could seek an order immediately to halt the whaling.

IFAW campaigner Darren Kindleysides said experts on international law had advised them that Australia could seek a preliminary ruling halting the whaling at the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea with only 14 days' notice.

"I can understand the need to gather evidence, but the option to go earlier is there."


The (Japanese) fleet has sailed south with a new chaser ship, Yushin Maru No. 3, as evidence of its commitment. Greenpeace says there are also plans for a 16,000-tonne factory ship, about twice the size of the existing Nisshin Maru, and with much greater freezer capacity.

The ageing Nisshin Maru suffered its second serious fire last season, and has had two crew fatalities in the past 12 months. It transfers much of its catch to a resupply vessel, the Oriental Bluebird, about halfway through the season.

Greenpeace produced evidence that the Japanese Government's Overseas Fisheries Co-operative Foundation would finance "research on marine mammals", and could assist with the cost, estimated at upwards of $120 million.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/sparing-humpbacks-wont-stop-whale-campaign/2007/12/20/1197740469158.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 20 Dec, 2007 05:59 pm
Interesting read from the AGE this morning:

It's about more than just whales
By Erich Fitzgerald, a palaeobiologist at Monash University and Museum Victoria.
December 21, 2007/the AGE

http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2007/12/21/rg_dyson_narrowweb__300x344,0.jpg
Illustration: Dyson

WHALES and dolphins stir the imagination and evoke our emotions to an extent almost unique among non-human critters. As fellow mammals, whales share a deep evolutionary heritage with us, just as rats, cats, dogs, bats and aardvarks do. Whales are long sundered from us by the vastness of over 60 million years, yet they are our true distant cousins in the sea. Perhaps it is this primeval shared ancestry that contributes to humankind's long-held fascination with cetaceans. They are like us in numerous ways: generally highly social, with complex behaviour; have sophisticated communication; possess what may best be described as culture; and, after humans and next to chimpanzees, include the most intelligent known organisms.

Ever since humans put to sea, we have relentlessly hunted whales and dolphins. With industrialisation and quantum leaps in technology, the oceans have seemingly shrunk and no depth is too great for our trawls, lines, nets and hooks. And so the "great days" of unchecked, unsustainable, whaling of the 20th century decimated populations of the great whales, with population after population, in species after species, inexorably and predictably crashing. When we had whaled-out the larger (or easier to kill) and more economically desirable species such as the sperm, right, blues and humpbacks, we moved on to progressively smaller species.

The International Moratorium on Whaling halted all commercial harvesting of cetaceans once it was clear that at least the great whales were in serious trouble, some facing imminent extinction. We had saved the whales, or so it seemed. Now, in the first decade of the 21st century, the "save the whales" campaign is regrouping. Focusing on the Japanese Government-sponsored harvesting of baleen whales for scientific research has led to a resurgence of the campaign.

In response, the Rudd Government has arguably increased tensions over Japanese whaling by deploying a civilian customs ship to monitor the Japanese whaling fleet. Japanese whaling is undertaken with the justification that it is scientific research, yet most whale biologists (outside Japan) question its scientific merits, let alone ethics. Japan claims that data on population and reproductive biology that they seek can be acquired only through lethal means. This is patently incorrect: non-lethal blood, blubber and faecal sample collection, supplemented with photographic documentation can provide this information. Such methods are standard practice among marine mammal scientists worldwide.

Despite assurances from Japanese government and whaling officials, there is simply no practical, rapid or humane way to kill a whale, especially in the open Southern Ocean. Although it is difficult to measure scientifically, there can be little doubt that the whales are in substantial amounts of pain and shock as they are being slaughtered in a process that can take several minutes.

Rather than reacting emotionally to this, we should make science our guide. A humpback or minke whale is no more special than a tuna, orange roughy, lobster or Barrier Reef coral. Every single species is equally important, each being the result of thousands to millions of years of evolution, and each playing a part in its ecosystem.

Japan claims that whaling is part of its history and cultural heritage. However, there is little, if any, evidence of Japan sending whaling fleets to the Southern Ocean before the 20th century.

On numbers alone, the planned Japanese minke whale hunt would not have a drastic impact on the Southern Ocean minke whale population, which may be more than 300,000. The main questions that surround the Southern Ocean minke whales are not only how many are actually there, but also how many species and subspecies exist? So, which and how many of each species are being killed?

For management, it is critical that we first understand whether one, two or even three species of minke whale are in. As for the humpbacks and fin whales, the estimated humpback population remains at half its pre-whaling size, while there is not even a vaguely accurate estimate of the fin whale population size. The lack of population estimates is clearly reason enough to argue strongly against Japan's intent to take humpback and fin whales this season. This can be done on scientific grounds without emotion or the notion that the humpbacks are "ours" as at least some Southern Ocean humpbacks migrate to Australian waters.

While we target Japanese whaling with attention and political as well as emotional investment, we are being distracted from the plight of other whales and dolphins in far more dire straits than minke, or even humpback and fin whales. It was only this year that the baiji, or Yangtze River dolphin, was pronounced extinct. Like the baiji, the North Pacific right whale is the living dead, it being a matter of time before the species is extinguished. The little vaquita porpoise of the Gulf of California numbers perhaps 100 to 300, and without immediate and decisive efforts by the Mexican Government to halt incidental by-catch in gillnets it may be headed for extinction in the coming decades. Then there is the mighty blue whale, the largest animal that has ever lived. Before industrial whaling, its Antarctic population was between 200,000 and 300,000; today, there are perhaps no more than 3000 of these superlative mammals in the Antarctic region.

Our exploitation of the ocean's resources and pollution of its depths now pose a clear threat to the survival of not only whales but other marine organisms that are less charismatic, but no less important. Ultimately, Japanese whaling is a sideshow to the global and far more urgent problem of destruction and simplification of marine environments worldwide. We claim to acknowledge the long-term damage wreaked by 20th century whaling, but history and current events show we aren't learning from our mistakes.

http://www.theage.com.au/news/opinion/its-about-more-than-just-whales/2007/12/20/1197740464569.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap1
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 3.32 seconds on 11/26/2024 at 04:17:06