Reply
Thu 12 May, 2005 10:19 pm
My first is made by city men--how very reprehensible,
Self-interest is the only plea that renders it defensible;
'Tis sometimes in the meadows seen--phenomenon botanical,
Not caused by feet of little folk, but growth that's cryptogamical.
My second is remarkable--his character's so various,
He may be good, or bad, or weak, or timid, temerarious;
The crowning glory of a tree--mechanical or musical,
Or literary, legal, but undoubtedly political.
My Whole, supposed to be the first--pre-eminence detestable,
More often in the background lurks, that fact is incontestable;
In insurrections, mutinies, and mischief--he's conspicuous,
Yet oftentimes, we know, contrives to make himself ridiculous.
Adrian - have you subscribed to 'The Magazine of Short Stories'?
Hehe, it went out of publication in 1893 so... no.
So nobody has any ideas huh?
No, not really. :-(
Could the second be something like: a fool, jester or puppet?
Hingehead writes, "Adrian - have you subscribed to 'The Magazine of Short Stories'?"
Vol 130 for the answer. :wink: